Chapter published in:
From Pragmatics to Dialogue
Edited by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes
[Dialogue Studies 31] 2018
► pp. 171188
References

References

Bateson, Gregory
1967A Theory of Play and Fantasy: A Report on Theoretical Aspects of the Project for Study of the Role of the Paradoxes of Abstraction in Communication. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
1972Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Bateson, Mary Catherine, Ray Birdwhistell, John Brockman, David Lipset, Rollo May, Margaret Mead, and Edwin Schlossberg
1977About Bateson. New York: John Brockman Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J.
2013 “Defining Pragmatics.” In Introduction to Pragmatics, 1–35. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof
1996The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Catt, Isaac E.
2014 “The Two Sciences of Communication in Philosophical Context.” Review of Communication 14(3–4): 201–228. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeVito, Joseph A.
1978Communicology: An Introduction to the Study of Communication. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fisher, Aubrey B.
1982 “Communication Pragmatism: Another Legacy of Gregory Bateson.” Journal of Applied Research on Children 10(1): 38–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lanigan, Richard
1975 “The Speech Act Theory of Interpersonal Communication: Stimulus for Research.” Journal of Applied Communications Research 3(2): 98–101.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles S.
1998The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Porcar, Codruta and Cristian Hainic
2011 “The Interactive Dimension of Communication: The Pragmatics of the Palo Alto Group”. Journal of Communication and Culture 1(1): 4–19.Google Scholar
Ray, Wendel A. and Karin Schlanger
2012 “John H. Weakland: An Interview in Retrospect.” Journal of Systemic Therapies 31(1): 55–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rich, Marc Howard and Robert T. Craig
2012 “Habermas and Bateson in a World Gone M.A.D.: Metacommunication, Paradox, and the Inverted Speech Situation.” Communication Theory 22: 383–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Christopher
2014 “The Dolphin Who Loved Me: The NASA-funded Project That Went Wrong.” The Guardian. Retrieved from http://​www​.theguardian​.com​/environment​/2014​/jun​/08​/the​-dolphin​-who​-loved​-meGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Geoffrey
1995The Dark Side of Paradise: Political Violence in Bali. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ruesch, Jurgen
1972Semiotic Approaches to Human Relations. Belgium: Mouton & Co. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruesch, Jurgen, and Gregory Bateson
1951Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Stagoll, Brian
2005 “Gregory Bateson (1904–1980): A Reappraisal.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 39: 1036–1045.Google Scholar
2006 “Gregory Bateson at 100.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 27(3): 121–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles
1989Sources of the Self. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain
2013 “Pragmatics Re-established on Its Feet: Weigand’s Mixed Game Model 2010.” Language and Dialogue 3(3): 457–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Helmick Beavin, and Don D. Jackson
1967Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2015 “Dialogue in the stream of life.” Language and Dialogue 5(2): 197–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winkin, Yves
1981La nouvelle communication. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar