Cover not available
Part of
From Pragmatics to Dialogue
Edited by Edda Weigand and István Kecskés
[Dialogue Studies 31] 2018
► pp. 171–188

Dialogic pragmatics and complex objects

Engaging the life and work of Gregory Bateson

This essay frames the insights of pragmatics within the stream of everyday life as a normatively dialogical communicative activity. Pragmatics understood as existentially dialogical moves from abstraction to concrete engagement of events and persons. Dialogic pragmatics eschews the assumption that one can single-handedly construct the world, embodying a humble and simultaneously creative social task of infinite semiosis. In order to illustrate this perspective, I turn to a brief outline of pragmatics and then illuminate this perspective with emphasis on the holistic and relational insights of Gregory Bateson’s work and life. I end with discussion of Bateson’s life as a complex object that reveals dialogic pragmatics in unceasing framing of action and reaction, an act of infinite semiosis.
Keywords: Gregory Bateson, dialogue, complex objects, communicology, pragmatism
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Pragmatics and complex objects
  • 3.From paradox to metacommunication: Complex objects
  • 4.Communicology and complex objects
  • 5.Bateson’s biography as a complex object
  • 6.Dialogic pragmatics: Understanding complex objects
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 5 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.09arn
References (25)
References
Bateson, Gregory. 1967. A Theory of Play and Fantasy: A Report on Theoretical Aspects of the Project for Study of the Role of the Paradoxes of Abstraction in Communication. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
. 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Bateson, Mary Catherine, Ray Birdwhistell, John Brockman, David Lipset, Rollo May, Margaret Mead, and Edwin Schlossberg. 1977. About Bateson. New York: John Brockman Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 2013. “Defining Pragmatics.” In Introduction to Pragmatics, 1–35. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Brockman, John. 2004. Gregory Bateson: The Centennial. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Capra, Fritjof. 1996. The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Catt, Isaac E. 2014. “The Two Sciences of Communication in Philosophical Context.” Review of Communication 14(3–4): 201–228. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeVito, Joseph A. 1978. Communicology: An Introduction to the Study of Communication. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Fisher, Aubrey B. 1982. “Communication Pragmatism: Another Legacy of Gregory Bateson.” Journal of Applied Research on Children 10(1): 38–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanigan, Richard. 1975. “The Speech Act Theory of Interpersonal Communication: Stimulus for Research.” Journal of Applied Communications Research 3(2): 98–101.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles S. 1998. The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Porcar, Codruta and Cristian Hainic. 2011. “The Interactive Dimension of Communication: The Pragmatics of the Palo Alto Group”. Journal of Communication and Culture 1(1): 4–19.Google Scholar
Ray, Wendel A. and Karin Schlanger. 2012. “John H. Weakland: An Interview in Retrospect.” Journal of Systemic Therapies 31(1): 55–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rich, Marc Howard and Robert T. Craig. 2012. “Habermas and Bateson in a World Gone M.A.D.: Metacommunication, Paradox, and the Inverted Speech Situation.” Communication Theory 22: 383–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Riley, Christopher. 2014. “The Dolphin Who Loved Me: The NASA-funded Project That Went Wrong.” The Guardian. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar
Robinson, Geoffrey. 1995. The Dark Side of Paradise: Political Violence in Bali. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ruesch, Jurgen. 1972. Semiotic Approaches to Human Relations. Belgium: Mouton & Co. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruesch, Jurgen, and Gregory Bateson. 1951. Communication: The Social Matrix of Psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Stagoll, Brian. 2005. “Gregory Bateson (1904–1980): A Reappraisal.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 39: 1036–1045.Google Scholar
. 2006. “Gregory Bateson at 100.” Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 27(3): 121–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain. 2013. “Pragmatics Re-established on Its Feet: Weigand’s Mixed Game Model 2010.” Language and Dialogue 3(3): 457–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watzlawick, Paul, Janet Helmick Beavin, and Don D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2015. “Dialogue in the stream of life.” Language and Dialogue 5(2): 197–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkin, Yves. 1981. La nouvelle communication. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar