Cover not available
Article published In:
The Role of ISO/TC 37 Standards for Translators, Interpreters, Terminologists and Beyond
Edited by Hendrik J. Kockaert
[Digital Translation 10:2] 2023
► pp. 180–199

The impact of ISO/TC 37 standards on technical communication

ORCID logo | Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Rather than just profiting from digitalization efforts such as the implementation and improvement of automated content delivery processes, technical communication itself currently has the opportunity of becoming a major driver in digitalization. The essence of technical communicators’ work is to create representations of products under the aspect of product use. In order to convey how a product functions and how it shall be used, they build concepts that reflect its structure and the structure of the domain to which it belongs. These concepts and their interrelations represent the underlying architecture of information that is rendered into ‘technical documentation’ in the course of the information development process which parallels the product development process. To harmonize concepts for information on products to be launched and in its proper domain, as well as to ensure interoperability between digital resources, technical communication relies on a range of standards created within and published by ISO Technical Committee 37, Language and Terminology (ISO/TC 37).
Keywords: technical communication, terminology standardization, knowledge representation, concept model, digitalization, Internet of Things
Article outline
  • 1.Knowledge work in technical communication
    • 1.1What is technical communication concerned with?
    • 1.2What happens in the information development process?
      • 1.2.1Environment analysis (including market monitoring results)
      • 1.2.2Planning and concept development
      • 1.2.3Content creation, media production, publication and distribution
  • 2.Conceptual information in technical communication
    • 2.1From documents to information
    • 2.2From mental models to concept systems
  • 3.Technical communication and its terminology
    • 3.1ISO 24183, Technical communication – Vocabulary
    • 3.2Concept model in ISO 24183
  • 4.Digitalization, concept repositories and terminology
    • 4.1Concept repositories
    • 4.2Characterization of properties
    • 4.3Technical communication and submodel templates
  • 5.ISO TR 24633 series: TBX in new looks
  • 6.SMART: Standards that speak for themselves
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 15 December 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dt.00007.mah
References (35)
References
Abterno, Hippie. 2006. Folio Bound VIEWS – the Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Commens. Digital Companion to C. S. Peirce: Diagram, Dictionary, Commens. 2023. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/2226: Laying down Rules for the Application of Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards Electronic Instructions for Use of Medical Devices. 2021. Official Journal of the European Union 2021: L 448/32 – L 448/38, EU Publications Office.Google Scholar
“Common Data Dictionary.” 2023. International Electrotechnical Commission. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
“Defining Technical Communication: Developing Information Products.” 2023. tekom Europe e.V. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
“Details of the Asset Administration Shell – Part 1: Specification.” 2022. Plattform Industrie 4.0. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Digital Data Chain Consortium. 2023. “Digital Data Chain.” Accessed April 2023. [URL].
Drewer, Petra, and Donatella Pulitano, eds. 2019. Terminologie: Epochen – Schwerpunkte – Umsetzungen. Zum 25-jährigen Bestehen des Rats für Deutschsprachige Terminologie. Kommunikation und Medienmanagement. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
“ECLASS e.V. Search the ECLASS Content.” 2023. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Gruber, Tom. 2021. “Definition of Ontology. What Is an Ontology.” In Encyclopedia of Database Systems, edited by M. Ling Liu and Tamer Özsu, 1–3. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Heidel, Roland. 2019. Industrie 4.0: The Reference Architecture Model RAMI 4.0 and the Industrie 4.0 Component. Berlin: Beuth.Google Scholar
“IDTA – Working Together to Promote the Digital Twin.” 2023. IDTA. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
IEC 2023 (FDIS). Asset Administration Shell for Industrial Applications – Part 1: Asset Administration Shell Structure. IEC 63278-1:2023. Geneva: IEC.
IEC/IEEE. 2019. Preparation of Information for Use (Instructions for Use) Of Products – Part 1: Principles and General Requirements. IEC/IEEE 82079-1:2019. Geneva: IEC.Google Scholar
“IEC/ISO SMART. Unleashing the digital power of international standards.” 2022. ISO. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
IEC PAS 63485. 2023. Intelligent Information Request and Deliver – A process model for the exchange of information for use. IEC PAS 63485:2023. Geneva: IEC.Google Scholar
ISO. 2023. Technical Communication – Vocabulary. ISO (FDIS) 24183:2023. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
. 2019. Terminology Work and Terminology Science – Vocabulary. ISO1087:2019. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
. 2022. Management of Terminology Resources – Data Categories – Part 1: Specifications. ISO12620-1:2022. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
. 2014. Graphic notations for concept modelling in terminology work and its relationship with UML – Part 1: Guidelines for using UML notation in terminology work. ISO 24156-1:2014. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
. 2019. Management of Terminology Resources – TermBase EXchange (TBX). ISO 30042:2019. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.Google Scholar
ISO SMART Standardization Proposal. 2022. Unpublished. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, ISO/TC 37.Google Scholar
“InterOpera.” 2023. Steinbeis Innovation gGmbH. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
“Introduction to TermBase EXchange (TBX): TBX Dialects.” 2021. LTAC. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. 2010. “Mental Models and Human Reasoning.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), Vol. 1, no. 43, 18243–18250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muthig, Jürgen. 2014. Standardisierungsmethoden für die Technische Dokumentation (tekom Hochschulschriften 16).Google Scholar
Ogden, Charles Kay, and Ivor Armstrong Richards. 1923. The Meaning of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism. London: K. Paul Trench Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
“RDF – Semantic Web Standards.” 2023. W3C. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Schmitz, Klaus-Dirk. 2020. Terminology Work – Best Practices 2.0. Cologne: Deutscher Terminologie-Tag e.V.Google Scholar
“SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System – Home Page.” 2012. W3C. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Sowa, John F. 2000. “Ontology, Metadata, and Semiotics.” In Conceptual Structures: Logical, Linguistic, and Computational Issues, 8th International Conference on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2000 Darmstadt, Germany, August 14–18, 2000 Proceedings¸ edited by Bernhard Ganter and Guy W. Mineau, 55–81. Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stjernfelt, Frederik. 2007. Diagrammatology: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Phenomenology, Ontology, and Semiotics (Synthese Library 336). Dordrecht: Springer Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Straub, Daniela. 2022. Trendreport 2022. Zahlen und Fakten der Technischen Kommunikation in Deutschland. Stuttgart: tekom.Google Scholar
tekom Deutschland e.V. About – Tekom iiRDS. 2023. Accessed June 2023. [URL]
Wüster, Eugen. 1979. Einführung in die allgemeine Terminologielehre und terminologische Lexikographie. Vol. 8, in Schriftenreihe der Technischen Universität Wien. Vienna: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar