Cover not available
Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 7:1 (2018) ► pp.2–25

Adolescents’ social background and non-standard writing in online communication

| University of Antwerp
| University of Antwerp
| University of Antwerp

In a large corpus (2.9 million tokens) of chat conversations, we studied the impact of Flemish adolescents’ social background on non-standard writing. We found significant correlations between different aspects of social class (level of education, home language and profession of the parents) and all examined deviations from formal written standard Dutch. Clustering several social variables might not only lead to a better operationalization of the complex phenomenon of social class, it certainly allows for discriminating social groups with distinct linguistic practices: lower class teenagers used each of the non-standard features much more often and in some cases in a different way than their upper class peers. Possible explanations concern discrepancies in terms of both linguistic proficiency and linguistic attitudes. Our findings emphasize the importance of including social background as an independent variable in variationist studies on youngsters’ computer-mediated communication.

Keywords: chatspeak, computer-mediated communication, social class, computational sociolinguistics, adolescents
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Operationalization of social background
  • 3.Operationalization of non-standardness
  • 4.Experimental setup
    • 4.1Corpus and participants
    • 4.2Methodology
  • 5.Results and discussion
    • 5.1Level of education
    • 5.2Home language
    • 5.3Profession of the parents
    • 5.4Social background (clustered)
      • 5.4.1Quantitative analysis
      • 5.4.2Group-bound preferences
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17018.hil
References
Aitchison, J.
(2013) Language change: Progress or decay? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Androutsopoulos, J.
(2011) Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In T. Kristiansen & N. Coupland (Eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe (pp. 145–161). Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Braham, P.
(2013) Key concepts in sociology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coates, J.
(1993) Quantitative studies. In J. Coates, Women, men and language. A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language (pp. 61–86). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Crompton, R.
(2010) The rise, fall and rise of social class. In A. Giddens & P. W. Sutton, Sociology: Introductory readings (3rd ed., pp. 154–160). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
De Decker, B., & Vandekerckhove, R.
(2012) De mythe van dialectrevival. In S. Kindt, P. Dendale, & A. Vanderheyden (Eds.), La langue mise en contexte: Essais en l’honneur d’Alex Vanneste (pp. 27–46). Maastricht: Shaker.Google Scholar
(2017) Global features of online communication in local Flemish: Social and medium-related determinants. Folia Linguistica, 51(1), 253–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jager, H., Mok, A. L., & Sipkema, G.
(2009) Grondbeginselen der sociologie. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Eckert, P.
(2000) Linguistic variation as social practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H., & Portocarero, L.
(1979) Intergenerational class mobility in three Western European societies: England, France and Sweden. The British Journal of Sociology, 30(4), 415–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erikson, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H.
(1992) The constant flux: A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
[FMET] Flemish Ministry of Education and Training/Vlaams ministerie van onderwijs en vorming
(2017) Structuur en organisatie van het onderwijssysteem. In Flemish Ministry of Education and Training, Statistisch jaarboek van het Vlaams onderwijs. Schooljaar 2015–2016 (pp. 8–18).Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H., & Breen, R.
(2007) Explaining educational differentials. Towards a formal rational action theory. In J. H. Goldthorpe, On Sociology, Vol. Two: Illustration and retrospect (2nd ed., pp. 45–72). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hilte, L., Vandekerckhove, R., & Daelemans, W.
(2016) Expressiveness in Flemish online teenage talk: A corpus-based analysis of social and medium-related linguistic variation. In D. Fišer & M. Beißwenger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th conference on CMC and social media corpora for the humanities, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 27–28 September 2016 (pp. 30–33), Ljubljana: Znanstvena zalozba Filozofske fakultete.Google Scholar
Holmes, J.
(1992) An introduction to sociolinguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kucukyilmaz, T., Cambazogly, B. B., Aykanat, C., & Can, F.
(2006) Chat mining for gender prediction. In T. Yakhno, & E. J. Neuhold (Eds.), Advances in information systems. ADVIS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 274–283). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Macionis, J. J.
(2011) Society. The basics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Marsh, I.
(Ed.) (2000) Sociology. Making sense of society. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Nguyen, D., Doğruöz, A. S., Rosé, C. P., & De Jong, F.
(2016) Computational sociolinguistics: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 42(3), 537–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkins, R.
(2012) Gender and emotional expressiveness: An analysis of prosodic features in emotional expression. Griffith Working Papers in Pragmatics and Intercultural Communication, 5(1), 46–54.Google Scholar
Peersman, C., Daelemans, W., Vandekerckhove, R., Vandekerckhove, B., & Van Vaerenbergh, L.
(2016) The effects of age, gender and region on non-standard linguistic variation in online social networks. Arxiv, 26 January 2016. Retrieved from [URL] (20 September 2016).
Trudgill, P.
(1983a) Social identity and linguistic sex differentiation. Explanations and pseudo-explanations for differences between women’s and men’s speech. In P. Trudgill, On dialect. Social and geographical perspectives (pp. 161–168). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1983b) Sex and covert prestige. Linguistic change in the urban dialect of Norwich. In P. Trudgill, On dialect. Social and geographical perspectives (pp. 169–185). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vandekerckhove, R., Cuvelier, P., & De Decker, B.
(2015) The integration of English in Flemish versus African online peer group language: A comparative approach. Language Matters, 46(3), 344–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vranken, J., Van Hootegem, G., Henderickx, E., & Vanmarcke, L.
(2017) Het speelveld, de spelregels en de spelers? Handboek sociologie. Den Haag: Acco.Google Scholar
Wolf, A.
(2000) Emotional expression online: Gender differences in emoticon use. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 3(5), 827–833. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Hilte, Lisa, Walter Daelemans & Reinhild Vandekerckhove
2024. Communicating across educational boundaries: accommodation patterns in adolescents’ online interactions. Applied Linguistics Review 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hilte, Lisa, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Walter Daelemans
2022. Linguistic Accommodation in Teenagers’ Social Media Writing: Convergence Patterns in Mixed-gender Conversations. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Serebryakov, Fanil Fagimovich
2022. “Correlation is the Truth of all Existence,” or Interdisciplinarity as a Methodological Principle of Adequate Social Cognition. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 9 ► pp. 2368 ff. DOI logo
Surkyn, Hanne, Reinhild Vandekerckhove & Dominiek Sandra
2021. The impact of analogical effects and social factors on the spelling of partially homophonous verb forms in informal social media writing. Written Language & Literacy 24:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2020. Soziolinguistische Bibliographie europäischer Länder für 2018Sociolinguistic Bibliography of European Countries for 2018Bibliographie sociolinguistique des pays européens pour 2018. Sociolinguistica 34:1 ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.