Cover not available
Article published In:
Current Visions of TAML2: Tense, Aspect and Modality in Second Languages
Edited by Paz González and Tim Diaubalick
[Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 8:1] 2019
► pp. 24–40

Task and L1 effects

Dutch students acquiring the Spanish past tenses

| Leiden University
| University of Wuppertal

Research on tense-aspect phenomena has shown that the type of experimental task can affect the performance of L2 learners. This pilot study on the understudied language combination Dutch-Spanish investigates this issue by focusing on the interaction between known affecting variables (inherent aspect; L1 effects) and different tasks (multiple-choice, fill-in-the-blanks, free production). First findings show that, indeed, both task type and L1 have an influence on the outcome. Generally, Dutch learners seem to prefer the Imperfect over the Preterit. This stands in contrast to previous research but can be explained by the imperfective features of the Dutch Simple Past with which the learners associate the L2 forms. Whereas this L1 effect is not visible in the multiple-choice task where the choice is forced, it manifests itself in tasks where students can choose freely between forms they know. Especially in the free production task, the L1 effect interacts with a high individual variability.

Keywords: Spanish L2, tense-aspect, Spanish past tenses, Dutch L1
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction & background
  • 2.Aspectual contrasts in Spanish and Dutch
    • 2.1Spanish tense-aspect system
    • 2.2Dutch tense-aspect system
  • 3.State of the art
  • 4.Research question and specific hypotheses
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Experimental materials
    • 5.3Data collection
  • 6.Analysis and results
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 11 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.19017.dia
References
Andersen, R. W.
(1986) El desarrollo de la morfología verbal en el español como segundo idioma. In J. Meisel (Ed.), Adquisición del lenguaje – aquisicao da linguagem (pp. 115–138). Frankfurt am Main: Klaus-Dieter Vervuert Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andersen, R. W., & Y. Shirai
(1996) The primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin-creole connection. In B. Lauter, & W. Ritchie (Eds.), Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 527–570). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Borik, O., González, P., & Verkuyl, H.
(2004) Comparing tense systems: The primacy of the present-past opposition. In A. Dahl, K. Bentzen, & P. Svenonius (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, vol. 13.1 (pp. 13–29). Tromsø: Tromssø University Working Papers on Language & Linguistics.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, H., Corver, N., & Vos, R.
(2015) Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and verb phrases, Vol. 1. Comprehensive grammar resources. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camps, J.
(2005) The emergence of the imperfect in Spanish as a foreign language: The association between imperfective morphology and state verbs. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 431, 163–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comajoan, L.
(2014) Tense and aspect in second language Spanish. In K. L. Geeslin (Ed.). The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 7235–7252). Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
Comrie, B.
(1976) Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diaubalick, T.
(2019) La adquisición del sistema verbal español por aprendices alemanes y el papel del aspecto gramatical. Una comparación entre los tiempos del pasado y los tiempos del futuro. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Diaubalick, T., & Guijarro-Fuentes, P.
(2017) L1 effects as manifestation of individual differences in the L2 acquisition of the Spanish tense-aspect system. In K. Bellamy, M. Child, P. González, A. Muntendam, & M. C. Parafita Couto (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to bilingualism in the Hispanic and Lusophone World (pp. 9–40). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diaubalick, T. & Guijarro-Fuentes, P.
(2019) The strength of L1 effects on tense and aspect: How German learners of L2 Spanish deal with acquisitional problems. Language Acquisition, 26(3), 282–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Domínguez, L., Tracy-Ventura, N., Arche, M. J., Michell, R., & Myles, F.
(2013) The role of dynamic contrasts in the L2 acquisition of Spanish past tense morphology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
Domínguez, L., Arche, M. J., & Myles, F.
(2017) Spanish imperfect revisited: Exploring L1 influence in the reassembly of imperfective features onto new L2 forms. Second Language Research, 33(4). 431–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(02), 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, P.
(2003) Aspects on aspect: Theory and applications of grammatical aspect in Spanish. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
(2013) Research design: A two-way predicational system is better than a four-way approach. In M. R. Salaberry, L. Comajoan (Eds.). Research design and methodology in studies on L2 tense and aspect (pp. 159–186). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, P., & Diaubalick, T.
in press). Subtle differences, but rigorous implications: German and Dutch representation of tense-aspect features. Evidence from SLA. In G. De Vogelaer, D. Koster, & T. Leuschner Eds. German and Dutch in contrast: Synchronic, diachronic and psycholinguistic perspectives Berlin De Gruyter DOI logo
González, P., & Verkuyl, H.
(2017) A binary approach to Spanish tense and aspect: On the tense battle about the past. Borealis-An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 6(1). 97–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, P., & Quintana Hernandez, L.
(2018) Inherent aspect and L1 transfer in the L2 acquisition of Spanish grammatical aspect. The Modern Language Journal, 102(3), 611–625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, P., Jara Yupanqui, M., & Kleinherenbrink, C.
(2019) The microvariation of the Spanish perfect in three varieties. Isogloss. A journal on variation of Romance and Iberian languages, 4(1), 115–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haßler, G.
(2016) Temporalität, Aspektualität und Modalität in romanischen Sprachen. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McManus, K.
(2015) L1-L2 differences in the acquisition of form-meaning pairings: A comparison of English and German learners of French. Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 71(2), 51–77.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., & Salaberry, R.
(2003) The development of tense/aspect morphology in Spanish as a second language. In B. A. Lafford, & R. Salaberry (Eds.), Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 47–73). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Rojo, G., & Veiga, A.
(1999) El tiempo verbal. Los tiempos simples. In I. Bosque, & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. 21 (pp. 2902–2903). Madrid: Real Academia Española/Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M. R.
(2003) Tense aspect in verbal morphology. Hispania, 86(3), 559–573. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Marking past tense in second language acquisition: A theoretical model. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Salaberry, M. R., & Ayoun, D.
(2005) The development of L2 tense-aspect in the Romance languages. In M. R. Salaberry, & D. Ayoun (Eds.), Tense and aspect in Romance Languages: Theoretical and applied perspectives (pp. 1–33). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, S. A., & Torres Cacoullos, R.
(2008) Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The ‘perfect’ road to perfective. Language Variation and Change, 201, 1–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shirai, Y., & Andersen, R. W.
(1995) The acquisition of tense-aspect morphology: A prototype account. Language, 71(4), 743–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R.
(2001) Telicity in second language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Hout, A.
(2005) Past tense interpretations in Dutch. In H. Broekhuis, N. Corver, R. Huijbregts, U. Kleinhenz, & J. Koster (Eds.). Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z.
(1957) Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verkuyl, H. J.
(1993) A theory of aspectuality: The interaction between temporal and atemporal structure. Cambridge studies in linguistics: Vol. 641. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K.
(2007) Some effects of aspect on tense construal. Lingua, 117(2), 464–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Diaubalick, Tim & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2022. Consequences of the comparative fallacy for the acquisition of grammatical aspect in Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 0:0 DOI logo
González, Paz & Carmen Kleinherenbrink
2021. Target Variation as a Contributing Factor in TAML2 Production. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 87 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.