Article published in:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 9:1/2 (2020) ► pp. 215235
References
Altinkamis, F., & Agirdag, O.
(2014) Determinants of language use and attitudes among Turkish speakers in Flanders: A focus on generational difference. Bilig, 70(3), 59–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babel, M., & Russell, J.
(2015) Expectations and speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(5), 2823–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S.
(2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4 . Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baudonck, N. L. H., Buekers, R., Gillebert, S., & Van Lierde, K. M.
(2009) Speech intelligibility of Flemish children as judged by their parents. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 611, 288–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bent, T. & Bradlow, A. R.
(2003) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1141, 1600–1610. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Best, C. T.
(1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 171–204. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Boerma, T., & Blom, E.
(2017) Assessment of bilingual children: What if testing both languages is not possible?. Journal of Communication Disorders, 661, 65–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
(2018) Praat: Doing Phonetics by computer [computer programme], Version 6.0.36.Google Scholar
Buekers, R., Dekelver, J., & Zoons, M.
(2005) Beoordeling en meting Percentage Spraakverstaanbaarheid bij kinderen [Assessment and measurement Percentage Speech Intelligibility]. Logopedie, 171, 23–32.Google Scholar
Core, C., & Hoff, E.
(2012) Relationship of real and nonword production ability to vocabulary size in Spanish and English speaking toddlers. Paper presented at International Child Phonology Conference, June 4–6 2012. Minneapolis, MN.
Core, C., & Scarpelli, C.
(2015) Phonological development in young bilinguals: Clinical implications. Seminars in Speech and Language, 36(2), 100–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A.
(2018) Input, context and early child bilingualism: implications for clinical practice. In A. Bar-On, & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives (pp. 599–616). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
De Jong, J., Cavus, N., & Baker, A. E.
(2010) Language impairment in Turkish-Dutch bilingual children. In M. Topbas, & M. Yavas (Eds.), Communication disorders in Turkish (pp. 290–302). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smedt, H., Roeyers, H., & Schelpe, L.
(2017) Suggesties voor een handelingsgerichte diagnostiek van de taalontwikkeling bij meertalige kinderen [Suggestions for an action-oriented diagnosis of language development in multilingual children]. Signaal, 261, 4–20.Google Scholar
Fox, J., & Weisberg, S.
(2019) An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). SAGE: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar
Dodd, B., Holm, A., Hua, Z., & Crosbie, S.
(2003) Phonological development: A normative study of British English-speaking children. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 17(8), 617–643. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hayes-Harb, R., Smith, B. L., Bent, T., & Bradlow, A. R.
(2008) The interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit for native speakers of Mandarin: Production and perception of English word-final voicing contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 36(4), 664–679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoff, E.
(2006) How social contexts support and shape language development. Developmental Review, 261, 55–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.
(2000) The phonology of English as an international language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kang, O., Thomson, R. I., & Moran, M.
(2018) Empirical approaches to measuring the intelligibility of different varieties of English in predicting listener comprehension. Language Learning, 68(1), 115–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kent, D. R., & Miolo, G.
(1994) The intelligibility of children’s speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31, 81–95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M., & Derwing, T.
(1995) Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prezas, R. F., Hodson, W. B., & Schommer-Aikins, M.
(2014) Phonological assessment and analysis of bilingual preschoolers’ Spanish and English word productions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 231, 176–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rajadurai, J.
(2007) Intelligibility studies: a consideration of empirical and ideological issues. World Englishes, 26(1), 87–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://​www​.R​-project​.org/
Scarpelli, C., & Core, C.
(2014) Predictors of bilingual speech production in English-Spanish speaking preschoolers at 48 months. Poster presented at Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; November 20–22 2014. Orlando, FL.
Thordardottir, E., Rothenberg, A., Rivard, M.-E., & Naves, R.
(2006) Bilingual assessment: Can overall proficiency be estimated from separate measurement of two languages? Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders, 4(1), 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasandani, V., Babel, M., & Munson, B.
(2018) Investigating the influence of listener attitudes and expectations on the intelligibility of Hindi English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1431, p. 1924. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dutch speech intelligibility in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children in Flanders