Article published in:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 9:1/2 (2020) ► pp. 182206
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S.
(2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.
(1999) Vertical and horizontal discourse: An essay. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 157–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonset, H., & Hoogeveen, M.
(2010) Taalbeschouwing. Een inventarisatie van empirisch onderzoek in basis- en voortgezet onderwijs. [Language contemplation. An inventory of empirical research in primary and secondary education] Enschede: SLO.Google Scholar
Coppen, P. A.
(2010) De taal is een rommeltje. [Language is a messy problem] In H. Hulshof, & T. Hendrix, Taalkunde in het voortgezet onderwijs. Special Levende Talen Magazine. Amsterdam: Levende Talen, 26–29.Google Scholar
Den Hertog, C. H.
(1892) Nederlandsche spraakkunst. Handleiding ten dienste van aanstaande (taal)onderwijzers. [Dutch grammar. Manual for the benefit of prospective (language) teachers] Amsterdam: 1e druk. De leer van den enkelvoudigen zin.Google Scholar
Derewianka, B.
(2018) Changing approaches to the conceptualization and teaching of grammar. International Handbook of English Language Teaching, 843–858. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ennis, R. H.
(1989) Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed research. Educational Researcher, 18(3), 4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Featherston, S.
(2008) Thermometer judgements as linguistic evidence. In C. M. Riehl, & A. Rothe (Eds.), Was ist linguististische Evidenz? (pp. 69–90). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.Google Scholar
Fontich, X., & Camps, A.
(2013) Towards a rationale for research into grammar teaching in schools. Research Papers in Education, 29(5), 598–625. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gartland, L. B., & Smolkin, L. B.
(2015) The histories and mysteries of grammar instruction. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 391–399. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, R., & Walmsley, J.
(2005) The English Patient: English grammar and teaching in the twentieth century. Journal of Linguistics, 41(3), 593–622. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Locke, T.
(2010) Beyond the grammar wars: A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom. London, England: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy Young, K., & Leinhardt, G.
(1998) Wildflowers, sheep and democracy: The role of analogy in the teaching and learning of history. In J. F. Voss, & M. Carretero, Learning and reasoning in history. International review of history education (vol. 21, pp. 154–156). London: Woburn.Google Scholar
McPeck, J. E.
(1990) Critical thinking and subject specificity: A reply to Ennis. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 10–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, T.
(2004) The critical thinking debate: How general are general thinking skills? Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1), 3–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moseley, D., Baumfield, V., Elliot, J., Gregson, M., Higgins, S., Miller, J., & Newton, D.
(2005) Frameworks for thinking: A handbook for teaching and learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myhill, D.
(2018) Grammar as a meaning-making resource for language development. Contribution to a special issue Working on Grammar at School in L1 Education: Empirical Research Across Linguistic Regions. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 181, 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Renaud, R. D., & Murray, H. G.
(2008) A comparison of a subject-specific and a general measure of critical thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 85–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Boxtel, C., & Van Drie, J.
(2018) Historical reasoning. The Wiley International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning (pp. 149–176). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C.
(2007) Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for Analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Gelderen, A.
(2010) Does explicit teaching of grammar help students to become better writers? Insights from empirical research. In T. Locke (Ed.), Beyond the grammar wars. A resource for teachers and students on developing language knowledge in the English/literacy classroom (pp. 109–128). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Rijt, J. & Coppen, P. A.
(2017) Bridging the gap between linguistic theory and L1 grammar education – experts’ views on essential linguistic concepts. Language Awareness, 26(4), 360–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Rijt, J., De Swart, P. & Coppen, P. A.
(2018) Linguistic concepts in L1 grammar education: A systematic literature review. Research Papers in Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Van Rijt, J., Wijnands, A. & Coppen, P. A.
(2019) Dutch teachers’ beliefs on linguistic concepts and reflective judgement in grammar teaching. L-1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 191, 1–28.Google Scholar
Van Rijt, J., De Swart, P., Wijnands, A. & Coppen, P. A.
(2019) When students tackle grammatical problems: Exploring linguistic reasoning with linguistic metaconcepts in L1 grammar education. Linguistics and Education, 521, 78–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wineburg, S. S.
(1998) Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cognitive Science, 221, 319–346. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, J. W.
(2010) Levende talen. In H. Hulshof, & T. Hendrix, Taalkunde en het schoolvak Nederlands [Linguistics and the school subject Dutch] (pp. 51–54). Amsterdam: Levende Talen Magazine.Google Scholar
Defining linguistic reasoning