Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 5:2 (2016) ► pp.101125
References (42)
Aissen, J
(2003) Differential object marking. Iconicity versus economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 211, 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Artoni, D., & Magnani, M
(2013) LFG contributions in second language acquisition research: The development of case in L2 Russian. In M. Butt & T. Holloway King (Eds.), Proceedings of the LFG13 conference (pp. 69–89). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Baten, K
Baten, K., & Håkansson, G
(2015) The development of subordinate clauses in German and Swedish as L2s: A theoretical and methodological comparison. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 371, 517–547. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baten, K., & Verbeke, S
(2015) The acquisition of the ergative case in Hindi as a foreign language. In K. Baten, A. Buyl, K. Lochtman, & M. Van Herreweghe (Eds.), Theoretical and methodological developments in Processability Theory (pp. 71–104). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Montrul, S., & Polinsky, M
(2013) Heritage languages and their speakers: Opportunities and challenges for linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 391, 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bossong, G
(1985) Empirische Universalienforschung: Differentielle Objektmarkierung in Neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Butt, M
(1993) Object specificity and agreement in Hindi/Urdu. 29th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 11, 80–103.Google Scholar
Collentine, J
(2004) The effects of learning contexts on morphosyntactic and lexical development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 261, 227–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Hoop, H., & Narasimhan, B
(2005) Differential case marking in Hindi. In M. Amberber & H. de Hoop (Eds.), Competition and variation in natural languages: The case for case (pp. 321–346). Amsterdam: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R
(1991) Foreign language development during a semester abroad. In B. Freed (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp. 104–119). Lexington, MA: DC Heath & Co.Google Scholar
(2010) Monitoring processes in Spanish as a second language during a study abroad program. Foreign Language Annals, 431, 80–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M
(2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 101, 7–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Swart, P
(2006) Case markedness. In L. Kulikov, A. Malchukov, & P. de Swart (Eds.), Case, valency and transitivity (pp. 249–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Swart, P., & De Hoop, H
(2007) Semantic aspects of differential object marking. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 111, 568–581.Google Scholar
DiBiase, B., Bettoni, C., & Medojevic, L
(2015) The development of case in a bilingual context: Serbian in Australia. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monographs Series 3) (pp. 195–212). Amsterdam: The European Second Language Association.Google Scholar
Di Biase, B., & Hinger, B
(2015) Exploring the acquisition of differential object marking (DOM) in Spanish as a second language. In C. Bettoni & B. Di Biase (Eds.), Grammatical development in second languages: Exploring the boundaries of Processability Theory (Eurosla Monographs Series 3) (pp. 213–242). Amsterdam: European Second Language Association.Google Scholar
Guntermann, G
(1995) The Peace Corps experience: Language learning in training and in the field. In B. Freed (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 149–170). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howard, M
(2005) On the role of context in the development of learner language: Insights from study abroad research. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1481, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iggesen, O
(2005) Case-asymmetry. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Isabelli, C., & Nishida, C
(2005) Development of the Spanish subjunctive in a nine month study abroad setting. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 6th Conference on the acquisition of Spanish as first and second languages (pp. 78–91). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
Isabelli-Garcia, Christina
(2010) Acquisition of Spanish gender agreement in two learning contexts: Study abroad and at home. Foreign Language Annals, 43(2), 289–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Y
(2006) Hindi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, U., & de Swart, P
(2011) Case and referential properties. Lingua, 1211, 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazard, G
(2001) Le marquage différentiel de l’objet. In M. Haspelmath (Ed.), Language typology and language universals (pp. 873–885). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lenzing, A
(2015) Exploring regularities and dynamic systems in L2 development. Language Learning, 651, 89–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M
(2015) Variability and variation in Second Language Acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. Language Learning, 651, 63–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martoccio, A.M
(2012) The acquisition of differential object marking in L2 Spanish learners. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
McManus, K., & Mitchell, R
(2015) Subjunctive use and development in L2 French: A longitudinal study. Language, Interaction, and Acquisition, 61, 42–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, T
(1994) Argument Structure in Hindi. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Bhatia, A
(2012) Erosion of case and agreement in Hindi heritage speakers. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 21, 141–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., & Gürel, A
(2015) The acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish by Turkish speakers. In T. Judy & S. Perpiñán (Eds.), The acquisition of Spanish in understudied language pairings (pp. 281–308). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S., Bhatt, R., & Girju, R
(2015) Differential object marking in Spanish, Hindi and Romanian as heritage languages. Language, 911, 564–610. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S
(2016) The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, G
(2007) An operational definition of the emergence criterion. Applied Linguistics, 281, 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pienemann, M
(2005) Cross-linguistic aspects of Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Processability and teachability. In C.A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2015) An outline of processability theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. Language Learning, 651, 123–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, M
(2008) The acquisition of differential object marking in Spanish. Probus, 201, 111–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ticio, E
(2015) Differential object marking in Spanish-English early bilinguals. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 51, 62–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R
(1992) An overview of ergative phenomena and their implications for language acquisition. In D. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 31 (pp. 15–37). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by 7 other publications

Ponnet, Aaricia & Ludovic De Cuypere
2024. The acquisition of Hindi split-ergativity and differential object marking by Dutch L1 speakers: systematicity and variation. Language Acquisition 31:2  pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Baten, Kristof & Aaricia Ponnet
2023. Chapter 4. Extending PT to split ergative marking and differential object marking. In Processability and Language Acquisition in the Asia-Pacific Region [Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition Research & Teaching, 9],  pp. 91 ff. DOI logo
Bhatia, Archna & Silvina Montrul
2020. Chapter 10. Comprehension of Differential Object Marking by Hindi heritage speakers. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26],  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Bhatia, Archna & Silvina Montrul
2020. Chapter 10. Comprehension of Differential Object Marking by Hindi heritage speakers. In The Acquisition of Differential Object Marking [Trends in Language Acquisition Research, 26],  pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso
Rodríguez-Ordóñez, Itxaso
Montrul, Silvina, Archna Bhatia, Rakesh Bhatt & Vandana Puri
2019. Case Marking in Hindi as the Weaker Language. Frontiers in Psychology 10 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.