Article published in:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 6:1 (2017) ► pp. 6576

Full-text

The Dutch translation of the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) 2007 dictionary
References

References

Balsters, M.
(2013) Expression and perception of emotions. Tilburg: Tilburg University.Google Scholar
Bjekić, J., Lazarević, L. B., Živanović, M., & Knežević, G.
(2014) Psychometric evaluation of the Serbian dictionary for automatic text analysis LIWCser. Psihologija, 47(1), 5–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boot, P.
(2011) Predicting long-term activity in online writing communities: A quantitative analysis of amateur writing. Paper presented at the Supporting Digital Humanities 2011. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from http://​crdo​.up​.univ​-aix​.fr​/SLDRdata​/doc​/show​/copenhagen​/SDH​-2011​/submissions​/sdh2011​_submission​_1​.pdf
(2013) The desirability of a corpus of online book responses. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature. Retrieved 2015-12-27 from http://​www​.aclweb​.org​/anthology​-new​/W​/W13​/W13​-1405​.pdf
(2016) LIWCtools. Tools for working with LIWC dictionaries (Version 0.0.1). Retrieved 2016-09-02 from https://​github​.com​/pboot​/LIWCtools
Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W.
(2007) The psychological function of function words. In K. Fiedeler (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 343–359). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.
(1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Coussement, K., & Van den Poel, D.
(2009) Improving customer attrition prediction by integrating emotions from client/company interaction emails and evaluating multiple classifiers. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 6127–6134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., Lee, L., Pang, B., & Kleinberg, J.
(2012) Echoes of power: Language effects and power differences in social interaction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. Crossref
Gonzales, A. L., Hancock, J. T., & Pennebaker, J. W.
(2010) Language style matching as a predictor of social dynamics in small groups. Communication Research, 37(1), 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, M. E., Slatcher, R. B., Eastwick, P. W., Scissors, L. E., Finkel, E. J., & Pennebaker, J. W.
(2011) Language style matching predicts relationship initiation and stability. Psychological Science, 22(1), 39–44.[ p. 75 ] CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lord, S. P., Sheng, E., Imel, Z. E., Baer, J., & Atkins, D. C.
(2015) More than reflections: Empathy in motivational interviewing includes language style synchrony between therapist and client. Behavior therapy, 46(3), 296–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meder, T., Nguyen, D., & Gravel, R.
(2015) The apocalypse on Twitter. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, First published online: 31 January 2015. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meganck, R., Vanheule, S., Inslegers, R., & Desmet, M.
(2009) Alexithymia and interpersonal problems: A study of natural language use. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 990–995. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nederlandse Taalunie
(2014) e-Lex 1.1.1 Available from http://​tst​-centrale​.org​/nl​/producten​/lexica​/e​-lex​/7​-25 (21 November 2015).
Nguyen, D., Gravel, R., Trieschnigg, D., & Meder, T.
(2013) “How old do you think I am?”; A study of language and age in Twitter. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Retrieved 2015-12-31 from http://​www​.dongnguyen​.nl​/publications​/nguyen​-icwsm2013​.pdf
Oostdijk, N., Reynaert, M., Hoste, V., & Schuurman, I.
(2013) The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W.
(2011) The secret life of pronouns. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., & Blackburn, K.
(2015) The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015. Retrieved from http://​www​.liwc​.net (27 November 2015).
Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M. E., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J.
Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J.
(2001) Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, J. W., & Graybeal, A.
(2001) Patterns of natural language use: Disclosure, personality, and social integration. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(3), 90–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez-Esparza, N., Pennebaker, J. W., García, F. A., & Suriá, R.
(2007) La psicología del uso de las palabras: Un programa de computadora que analiza textos en español. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 24(1), 85–99.Google Scholar
Receptiviti
(2016) Enabling AI platforms with emotional intelligence. Retrieved from http://​www​.receptiviti​.ai/ (7 April 2016).
Richardson, B. H., Taylor, P. J., Snook, B., Conchie, S. M., & Bennell, C.
(2014) Language style matching and police interrogation outcomes. Law and Human Behavior, 38(4), 357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scielzo, S. A., Patel, A., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A.
(2011) Academic mentoring relationship communication processes and participant-reported effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 81.Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W.
(2010) The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tiedemann, J.
(2012) Parallel data, tools and interfaces in OPUS. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’2012).[ p. 76 ]
Van der Zanden, R., Curie, K., Van Londen, M., Kramer, J., Steen, G., & Cuijpers, P.
(2014) Web-based depression treatment: Associations of clients’ word use with adherence and outcome. Journal of Affective Disorders, 160, 10–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Middendorp, H., & Geenen, R.
(2008) Poor cognitive-emotional processing may impede the outcome of emotional disclosure interventions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 13(1), 49–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M., Horn, A. B., Mehl, M. R., Haug, S., Pennebaker, J. W., & Kordy, H.
(2008) Computergestützte quantitative Textanalyse. Äquivalenz und Robustheit der deutschen Version des Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count. Diagnostica, 54(2), 85–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yu, B.
(2014) Language and gender in congressional speech. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 29(1), 118–132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zijlstra, H., Van Meerveld, T., Van Middendorp, H., Pennebaker, J. W., & Geenen, R.
(2004) De Nederlandse versie van de ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC) [The Dutch version of ‘Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count’ (LIWC)] Gedrag & Gezondheid [Behaviour & Health], 32, 271–281.Google Scholar
Zijlstra, H., Van Middendorp, H., Van Meerveld, T., & Geenen, R.
(2005) Validiteit van de Nederlandse versie van de Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) [Validity of the Dutch version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC)]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Psychologie [Netherlands Journal of Psychology], 60(3), 50–58.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Abdo, Muhammad S, Ali S Alghonaim & Bacem A Essam
2021. Public perception of COVID-19’s global health crisis on Twitter until 14 weeks after the outbreak. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36:3  pp. 509 ff. Crossref logo
Barnard, M.P., S. Pampel, G. Burnett, H.A. Allen & P. Chapman
2020. How do drivers recall positive and negative driving events? A quantitative approach to analysing driving diaries. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 69  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo
Bogaard, Glynis, Joyce van der Mark, Ewout H. Meijer & Nicholas D. Duran
2019. Detecting false intentions using unanticipated questions. PLOS ONE 14:12  pp. e0226257 ff. Crossref logo
Dudău, Diana Paula & Florin Alin Sava
2020. The development and validation of the Romanian version of Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (Ro-LIWC2015). Current Psychology Crossref logo
Dudău, Diana Paula & Florin Alin Sava
2021. Performing Multilingual Analysis With Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 (LIWC2015). An Equivalence Study of Four Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Kleinberg, Bennett, Lara Warmelink, Arnoud Arntz & Bruno Verschuere
2018. The first direct replication on using verbal credibility assessment for the detection of deceptive intentions. Applied Cognitive Psychology 32:5  pp. 592 ff. Crossref logo
SAMSUL ARİFİN, Samsul Arifin, Heri RETNAWATİ & Himawan PUTRANTA
2020. The factors that influence of Reading ability the Hijaiyah alphabet on pre-school children. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists  pp. 667 ff. Crossref logo
Sender, Gisela, Flavio Carvalho & Gustavo Guedes
2021. The Happy Level: A New Approach to Measure Happiness at Work Using Mixed Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20  pp. 160940692110024 ff. Crossref logo
van der Zanden, Tess, Alexander P. Schouten, Maria Mos, Chris van der Lee & Emiel Krahmer
2019. Effects of Relationship Goal on Linguistic Behavior in Online Dating Profiles: A Multi-Method Approach. Frontiers in Communication 4 Crossref logo
van’t Riet, Jonathan & Mariska Kleemans
2021. What drives selection of online children’s news articles?. Journalism  pp. 146488492110101 ff. Crossref logo
Wang, Zhe, Chun-Hua Wu, Qing-Biao Li, Bo Yan & Kang-Feng Zheng
2020. Encoding Text Information with Graph Convolutional Networks for Personality Recognition. Applied Sciences 10:12  pp. 4081 ff. Crossref logo
Xu, Xiaoxu
2021.  In Application of Intelligent Systems in Multi-modal Information Analytics [Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1234],  pp. 508 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.