Commentary published In:
Biological Evolution: More than a metaphor for grammar changeEdited by Maria Rita Manzini
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 3:1] 2021
► pp. 56–72
Edited by Maria Rita Manzini
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 3:1] 2021
► pp. 56–72
Response Paper
On evolution, change, and beyond
Some comments on Hubert Haider’s paper “Grammar change: A case of Darwinian cognitive evolution”
This paper discusses Hubert Haider’s target-article “Grammar change: A case of Darwinian cognitive evolution”. I
show why such an article is fascinating (and unconventional), although I will mainly concentrate on several disagreements with
Haider and will suggest alternative views to those contended by this scholar. My discussion will highlight five main issues: (1) Haider assumes a purely Neo-Darwinian (i.e. genocentric) view of evolution and inheritance, lacking a more pluralistic approach;
(2) Haider rejects the idea of language as a biological phenomenon, while at the same time he seems to assume several
characteristics related to a biologically seated trait; (3) as opposed to Haider’s suggestion, the computational system does not
need to be language-specific; (4) Haider’s divide between the procedural and declarative components of grammar is perhaps too
strict regarding (grammatical) change; and (5) Haider considers that there is no scientific way of deciding the question of
language origins and evolution and that complex grammars are too recent. However, I show that a language-like computational power
(and perhaps complex grammars) already existed many thousands of years ago.
References (57)
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Camps, M., Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G. & Uriagereka, J. (2011). The archaeological record speaks: Bridging anthropology and linguistics. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 20111, 1–17.
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G. (2013). The fossils of language: What are they, who has them, how did they evolve? In C. Boeckx & K. K. Grohmann (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of biolinguistics (pp. 489–523). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Camps, M., Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G. (2018). My head’s in knots. On Uriagereka’s generalization and the knot-sentence connection. In Á. Gallego & R. Martin (Eds.), Language, syntax, and the natural sciences (pp. 269–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Balari, S. & Lorenzo, G. (2009). Computational phenotypes: Where the theory of computation meets Evo-Devo. Biolinguistics, 3(1), 2–60.
(2013). Computational phenotypes. Towards an evolutionary developmental biolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bateson, P. (2001). Behavioral development and Darwinian evolution. In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths & R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingencies. Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 149–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Berwick, R. C. & Chomsky, N. (2016). Why only us. Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Blumberg, M. S. (2005). Basic instinct. The genesis of behavior. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.
Botha, R. P. (2008). Prehistoric shell beads as a window on language evolution. Language and Communication, 281, 197–212.
(2010). On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behavior. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 201, 345–356.
Camps, M. & Uriagereka, J. (2006). The gordian knot of linguistic fossils. In J. Rosselló & J. Martín (Eds.), The biolinguistic turn. Issues on language and biology (pp. 34–65). Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
Coolidge, F. L. & Wynn, T. (2004). A cognitive and neuropsychological perspective on the Châtelperronian. Journal of Anthropological Research, 601, 55–73.
(2009). The rise of Homo sapiens. The evolution of modern thinking. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. Evolution and the meanings of life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Dixon, R. M. W. (2010). Basic linguistic theory. Vol. 1: Methodology. New York: Oxford University Press.
(2016). Are some languages better than others? New York: Oxford University Press.
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D. (2001). Darwinism and developmental systems. In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths & R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingencies. Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 195–218). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T. (2007). The genesis of grammar. A reconstruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions. Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jablonka, E. & Raz, G. (2009). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: Prevalence, mechanisms, and implications for the study of heredity and evolution. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 84(2), 131–176.
Johnston, T. D. & Edwards, L. (2002). Genes, interactions, and the development of behavior. Psychological Review, 1091, 26–34.
Lass, R. (1997). Historical linguistics and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lieberman, P. (2000). Human language and our reptilian brain. The subcortical bases of speech, syntax, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
(2006). Toward an evolutionary biology of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lightfoot, D. (1999). The development of language. Acquisition, change, and evolution. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
(2006). How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Longa, V. M. (2013a). The evolution of the faculty of language from a Chomskyan perspective: Bridging linguistics and biology. Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 911, 15–62.
(2013b). Un análisis computacional de las líneas prehistóricas: diseños geométricos y lenguaje. Zephyrus. Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología, LXXI1, 15–43.
(2018). That was not ‘Lenneberg’s dream’. Historiographia Linguistica, 45(1/2), 179–209.
(2019a). Adaptive plasticity. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Wickes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Berlin: Springer.
(2019b). Making prehistoric lines speak: Inferring language and mental computations from ‘natural’ lines of parietal art. Philology. An International Journal on the Evolution of Languages, Cultures and Texts, 41, 243–278.
Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G. (2012). Theoretical linguistics meets development: Explaining FL from an epigenecist point of view. In C. Boeckx, M. C. Horno-Chéliz & J. L. Mendívil-Giró (Eds.): Language, from a biological point of view. Current issues in biolinguistics (pp. 52–84). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
(2019). The study of instinct. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Wickes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Berlin: Springer.
Lorenzo, G. & Longa, V. M. (2019). Development. In T. K. Shackelford & V. A. Wickes-Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Berlin: Springer.
Mameli, M. & Bateson, P. (2006). Innateness and the sciences. Biology and Philosophy, 211, 155–188.
Maynard-Smith, J. & Szathmáry, E. (1999). The origins of life: From the birth of life to the origin of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mendívil-Giró, J.-L. (2019). Did language evolve through language change? On language change, language evolution and grammaticalization theory. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1241, 1–30.
Moore, D. S. (2001): The dependent gene. The fallacy of ‘nature vs. nurture’. New York: Henry Holt.
Oyama, S. (2000). The ontogeny of information. Developmental systems and evolution, 2nd ed. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
(2001). Terms in tension: What do you do when all the good words are taken? In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths & R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingencies. Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 177–193). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. & Uriagereka, J. (2005). The evolution of the narrow faculty of language: The skeptical view and a reasonable conjecture. Lingue e Linguaggio, IV1, 27–79.
Russell, J. (1996). Development and evolution of the symbolic function: The role of working memory. In P. Mellars & K. Gibson (Eds.), Modelling the early human mind (pp. 159–170). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
Sampson, G. (2009). A linguistic axiom challenged. In G. Sampson, D. Gil & P. Trudgill (Eds.), Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable (pp. 1–18). New York: Oxford University Press.
Samuels, R. (2004). Innateness and cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 136–141.
Tremblay, P. & Dick, A. S. (2016). Broca and Wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology. Brain & Language, 1621, 60–71.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistics Research, 30(1), 37–69.
(2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 921, 231–270.
Vanhaeren, M., d’Errico, F., Stringer, C., James, S. L., Todd, J. A. & Mienis, H. K. (2006). Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria. Science, 3121, 1785–1788.
West-Eberhard, M. (2003). Developmental plasticity and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F. L. (2004). The expert Neanderthal mind. Journal of Human Evolution, 461, 467–487.
(2007). Did a small but significant enhancement in working-memory capacity power the evolution of modern thinking? In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the human revolution: New behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans (pp. 79–90). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
(Eds.) (2010). Working memory: Beyond language and symbolism. Current Anthropology, 511, Supplement 1.
(2012). How to think like a Neandertal. New York: Oxford University Press.