Commentary published in:Biological Evolution: More than a metaphor for grammar change
Edited by Maria Rita Manzini
[Evolutionary Linguistic Theory 3:1] 2021
► pp. 56–72
On evolution, change, and beyond
Some comments on Hubert Haider’s paper “Grammar change: A case of Darwinian cognitive evolution”
This paper discusses Hubert Haider’s target-article “Grammar change: A case of Darwinian cognitive evolution”. I show why such an article is fascinating (and unconventional), although I will mainly concentrate on several disagreements with Haider and will suggest alternative views to those contended by this scholar. My discussion will highlight five main issues: (1) Haider assumes a purely Neo-Darwinian (i.e. genocentric) view of evolution and inheritance, lacking a more pluralistic approach; (2) Haider rejects the idea of language as a biological phenomenon, while at the same time he seems to assume several characteristics related to a biologically seated trait; (3) as opposed to Haider’s suggestion, the computational system does not need to be language-specific; (4) Haider’s divide between the procedural and declarative components of grammar is perhaps too strict regarding (grammatical) change; and (5) Haider considers that there is no scientific way of deciding the question of language origins and evolution and that complex grammars are too recent. However, I show that a language-like computational power (and perhaps complex grammars) already existed many thousands of years ago.
Keywords: Hubert Haider, grammatical change, evolution, computational system, computational complexity
Published online: 02 August 2021
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Camps, M., Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G. & Uriagereka, J.
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G.
Balari, S., Benítez-Burraco, A., Camps, M., Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G.
Balari, S. & Lorenzo, G.
Berwick, R. C. & Chomsky, N.
Botha, R. P.
Camps, M. & Uriagereka, J.
Coolidge, F. L. & Wynn, T.
Dennett, D. C.
Dixon, R. M. W.
Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D.
Heine, B. & Kuteva, T.
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J.
Jablonka, E. & Raz, G.
Johnston, T. D. & Edwards, L.
Longa, V. M.
Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G.
(2012) Theoretical linguistics meets development: Explaining FL from an epigenecist point of view. In C. Boeckx, M. C. Horno-Chéliz & J. L. Mendívil-Giró (Eds.): Language, from a biological point of view. Current issues in biolinguistics (pp. 52–84). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Lorenzo, G. & Longa, V. M.
Maynard-Smith, J. & Szathmáry, E.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. & Uriagereka, J.
Tremblay, P. & Dick, A. S.
Ullman, M. T.
Vanhaeren, M., d’Errico, F., Stringer, C., James, S. L., Todd, J. A. & Mienis, H. K.
Wynn, T. & Coolidge, F. L.
(2007) Did a small but significant enhancement in working-memory capacity power the evolution of modern thinking? In P. Mellars, K. Boyle, O. Bar-Yosef & C. Stringer (Eds.), Rethinking the human revolution: New behavioural and biological perspectives on the origin and dispersal of modern humans (pp. 79–90). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.