Cover not available
Article published In:
Evolutionary Linguistic Theory
Vol. 4:2 (2022) ► pp.191–228

The cycle in language change

Insights from diachronic phonology and syntax of negation

| University of Verona
| University of Verona
Language change can be conceptualized as a cyclical process of continuous renewal of the involved elements which somehow change their nature, with respect to phonological or lexico-grammatical features. A crucial aspect of such diachronic evolution is that cyclical change takes place systematically and follows regular and unidirectional patterns of development. Once the change is complete, the same developmental path will be undertaken by new linguistic items in the same cyclical fashion. In this paper, we illustrate the concept of cyclical change by discussing two examples of linguistic cycles. A first instance of cyclical development is displayed at the phonological level by the diachronic changes in the obstruent consonant system taking place from Indo-European to German through the First and the Second Sound Shift: the cycle is completed in the Cimbrian dialects. A second instance is provided by the diachronic process known as Jespersen’s cycle ([1917] 1966): sentential negation, initially expressed through a single negative marker, is later reinforced by an additional one; eventually, this second element becomes the only negative marker available in the sentence while the original marker is deleted. The discussion of the negative cycle takes also into consideration the results of an empirical research conducted on two varieties of an Italo-Romance dialect spoken in northern Italy.
Keywords: linguistic cycle, sentential negation, Italo-Romance, Germanic, sound shifts, Grimm’s Law, Verner’s Law, Jespersen’s cycle
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The cycle in diachronic phonology
  • 3.The cycle for sentential negation
    • 3.1General outline
    • 3.2Cyclical changes at NegP level
    • 3.3The role of pragmatic and syntactic factors in the negative cycle
    • 3.4Synchronic evidence: Cross-linguistic strategies to express sentential negation
    • 3.5Sentential negation in Italo-Romance varieties: Diatopic variation in the Brescia area
  • 4.Case study: The negative cycle in Lumezzane and the urban area of Brescia
    • 4.1Informants
    • 4.2Data analysis
      • 4.2.1Indicative sentences
      • 4.2.2Imperatives
      • 4.2.3Protasis
      • 4.2.4Subjunctive subordinates
      • 4.2.5Negative concord constructions
    • 4.3Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 7 May 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/elt.00042.tag
References (98)
References
Abraham, W. (2003). Autonomous and non-autonomous components of ‘grammatic(al)ization’: economy criteria in the emergence of German negation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF), 56 (4), 325–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashby, W. J. (1981). The Loss of the Negative Particle ne in French: A Syntactic Change in Progress. Language, 57 (3), 674–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, A. (1990). Generalized verb movement: aspects of verb syntax. Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Benincà, P. (2006). A Detailed Map of the Left Periphery of Medieval Romance. In R. Zanuttini, H. Campos, E. Herburger, & P. H. Portner, Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture (pp. 53–86). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Benincà, P., & Poletto, C. (2004). Topic, focus and V2: defining the CP sub-layers. In L. Rizzi, The structure of IP and CP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Volume II1 (pp. 52–75). Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2009). Varianti sintattiche inter- e intraindividuali nelle grammatiche dialettali. In L. Amenta, & G. Paternostro, I parlanti e le loro storie. Competenze linguistiche, strategie comunicative, livelli di analisi. Atti del convegno Carini-Valderice, 23–25 ottobre 2008 (pp. 185–194). Palermo: Centro di Studi Filologici e Linguistici.Google Scholar
Bernini, G. (1987). Germanic and (Gallo-)Romance negation: an area typology. In P. Ramat, Linguistic typology (pp. 172–178). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bernini, G., & Ramat, P. (1990). Area influence vs. typological drift in Western Europe: the case of negation. In J. Bechert, C. Buridant, & G. Bernini, Toward a Typology of European Languages (pp. 25–46). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1996). Negative Sentences in the Languages of Europe. A Typological Approach. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, T. (2009). Jespersen off course? The case of contemporary Afrikaans negation. In E. van Gelderen, Cyclical Change (pp. 91–130). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, L., & Traugott, E. (2005). Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burridge, K. (1983). On the development of Dutch negation. In H. Bennis, & W. van Lessen Kloeke, Linguistics in the Netherlands 1983 (pp. 31–40). Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. (1976). Mica. Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e filosofia dell’Università di Padova, 1 1, 101–112.Google Scholar
(1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-Linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1991). The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics, 27 (1), 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Ö. (1979). Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics, 17 1, 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (1993). A Riddle on negation in Haitian. Probus, 5 1, 63–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devos, M., Kasombo Tshibandi, M., & van der Auwera, J. (2009). Double and triple negation in Kanincin (L53). Paper 3rd International Bantu Conference. Tervuren 2009.Google Scholar
Devoto, G., & Giacomelli, G. (2002). I dialetti delle regioni d’Italia. 3rd edition. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Espinal, M. T. (1993). The interpretation of no-pas in Catalan. Journal of Pragmatics 19 (4), 353–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fonseca-Greber, B. B. (2007). The Emergence of Emphatic ‘ne’ in Conversational Swiss French. Journal of French Language Studies, 17 (3), 249–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisch, S. (1997). The change in negation in middle English: A NEGP licensing account. Lingua, 101 (1–2), 21–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzonio, J. (2019). Not even a crumb of negation: on mica in Old Italian. In L. Franco, & P. Lorusso, Linguistic Variation: Structure and Interpretation (pp. 273–292). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garzonio, J., & Poletto, C. (2015). On preverbal negation in Sicilian and syntactic parasitism. Isogloss Special Issue on Italo-Romance morphosyntax, 133–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giannakidou, A. (1997). The landscape of Polarity Items. PhD dissertation: University of Groningen.
(2000). Negative… Concord? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 18 1, 457–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gianollo, C. (2016). Negation and indefinites in Late Latin. Pallas. Revue d’études antiques, 102 1, 277–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grevisse, M. (1964). Le bon usage. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. (1995). The syntax of negation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, C. H., Lidz, J., & Storosheko, D. R. (2011). Variation in negation and quantifier scope judgements in Korean. Proceedings from the Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 47 (2), 65–76.Google Scholar
Hansen, M.-B. M. (2011). Negative cycles and grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 570–579). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M.-B. M., & Visconti, J. (2009). On the Diachrony of “Reinforced” Negation in French and Italian. In C. Rossari, C. Cojocariu, C. Ricci, & A. Spiridon, Grammaticalization and Pragmatics: Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues (pp. 137–171). Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hodge, C. (1970). The Linguistic Cycle. Linguistic Sciences, 13 1, 1–7.Google Scholar
Howe, D. (1995). Negation in early African American English. University of Ottawa (Canada).Google Scholar
(2005). Negation in African American Vernacular English. In Y. Iyeiri, Aspects of English Negation (pp. 173–203). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaberg, K., & Jud, J. (1928–1940). AIS: Sprach-und Sachatlas Italiens und der Südschweiz. Atlante linguistico ed etnografico dell’Italia e della Svizzera meridionale. 81 vols. Zofingen: Ringier.Google Scholar
Jäger, A. (2008). History of German Negation. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. ([1917] 1966). Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1992). Italian Negative Infinitival Imperatives and Clitic Climbing. In L. Tasmowski, & A. Zribi-Hertz, Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet: de la musique à la linguistique (pp. 300–312). Ghent: Communication & Cognition.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P., & Condoravdi, C. (2006). Tracking Jespersen’s Cycle. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory (pp. 179–197). Mytilene: Doukas.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World’s Languages. Malden MA, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, W. A. (1996). Negation and polarity items. In S. Lappin, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory (pp. 321–341). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laka, I. (1990). Negation in Syntax: on the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation: MIT.
Larrivée, P. (2010). The pragmatic motifs of the Jespersen cycle: Default, activation, and the history of negation in French. Lingua, 120 (9), 2240–2258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, M., Schmid, S., Pescarini, D., Tisato, G., Donzelli, G., Negrinelli, S., & Zanini, C. (2019). AIS, reloaded (AISr). University of Zurich. [URL]
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia, L. (1998). Negation parameters and their interaction in Italian dialects. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIS, 2 1, 39–60.Google Scholar
(2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa (vol. 3). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
(2012). On the Lexical/Functional Divide: The Case of Negation. In L. Brugé, A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, & C. Poletto, Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures (pp. 338–351). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, A. (1912). L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia, 6 (12), 130–148.Google Scholar
Merchant, J. (2006). Why No(t)? Style, 40 (1–2), 20–23. [URL]
Nilsen, Ø. (2003). Eliminating Positions: Syntax and semantics of sentential modification. Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht.Google Scholar
Osthoff, H., & Brugmann, K. (1878). Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der indogermanischen Sprachen. Erster Theil. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Ouhalla, J. (1991). Functional Categories and Parametric Variation. 1st edition. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parry, M. (1997). Negation. In M. Maiden, & M. Parry, The Dialects of Italy (pp. 179–185). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). On Negation in the Ligurian Hinterland. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIS, 2 1, 85–112.Google Scholar
(2013). Variation and change in the presentational constructions of north-western Italo-Romance varieties. In E. van Gelderen, J. Barðdal, & M. Cennamo, Argument Structure in Flux (pp. 511–548). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pellegrini, G. B. (1977). Carta dei dialetti d’Italia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Penello, N., & Pescarini, D. (2008). Osservazioni su mica in italiano e alcuni dialetti veneti. Quaderni di lavoro ASIt, 8 1, 43–56.Google Scholar
Pescarini, D. (2009). ‘Presuppositional’ Negation, Modality, and the {Addressee}. Padua Working Papers in Linguistics, 3 1, 22–29.Google Scholar
(2022). A Quantitative Approach to Microvariation: Negative Marking in Central Romance. Languages, 7 (2), 87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pescarini, D., & Donzelli, G. (2017). La negazione nei dialetti della Svizzera italiana. Vox Romanica, 76 (1), 74–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pescarini, D., & Penello, N. (2012). L’avverbio mica fra widening semantico e restrizioni sintattiche. In V. Bambini, I. Ricci, & P. M. Bertinetto, Linguaggio e cervello – Semantica, Atti del XLII Congresso internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI), Pisa, 25–27 September 2008 (sez. II.B.P). Rome. Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Poletto, C. (2000). The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2008). Parallel phases: a study on the high and low left periphery of Old Italian. In M. Frascarelli, Phases of Interpretation (pp. 261–294). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollock, J. (1989). Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20 1, 365–424.Google Scholar
(1997). Notes on Clause Structure. In L. Haegeman, Elements of Grammar. Kluwer International Handbook of Linguistics (pp. 237–279). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poppe, E. (1995). Negation in Welsh and ‘Jespersen’s Cycle’. Journal of Celtic Linguistics, 4 1, 99–107.Google Scholar
Rabanus, S. (2018). Bilingualism and contact-induced language change in Cimbrian: possessive constructions. Lingue e Linguaggio, XVII (1), 55–69. [URL]
Ramat, P. (1994). Negation. In R. E. Asher, The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (pp. 2769–2774). Oxford: Pergamon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I. (2007). Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, I., & Roussou, A. (2003). Syntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rowlett, P. (1998). Sentential Negation in French. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salmons, J. (2018). A history of German. What the past reveals about today’s language. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Vincent, D. (1977). L’emploi productif du ne dans le français parlé à Montréal. Français (Le) Moderne Paris, 45 (3), 243–256.Google Scholar
Schmidt, W. (2004). Geschichte der deutschen Sprache. 9th edition. Stuttgart: Hirzel.Google Scholar
Schwegler, A. (1988). Word-Order Changes in Predicate Negation Strategies in Romance Languages. Diachronica, 5 (1–2), 21–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schweizer, B., & Rabanus, S. (2012). Zimbrischer und Fersentalerischer Sprachatlas. Atlante linguistico cimbro e mòcheno. Luserna: Istituto Cimbro/Palù del Fersina: Istituto Culturale Mòcheno. [URL]
Schwenter, S. A. (2006). Fine-tuning Jespersen’s Cycle. In B. Ward Birner, & G. Ward, Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honour of Laurence R. Horn (pp. 327–344). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A., & Wu, X. Z. (2002). Agreement, Shells, and Focus. Language, 78 (2), 287–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speyer, A. (2007). Germanische Sprachen. Ein historischer Vergleich. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Traugott, E., & Heine, B. (1991). Grammaticalization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vai, M. (1996). Per una storia della negazione in milanese in comparazione con altre varietà altoitaliane. ACME, 49 (1), 57–98.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, J. (2009). The Jespersen cycles. In E. van Gelderen, Cyclical Change (pp. 35–71). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. (2004). Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, A. (2000). Jespersen’s cycle revisited: formal properties of grammaticalization. In S. Pintzuk, G. Tsoulas, & A. Warner, Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms (pp. 51–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [URL]
Visconti, J. (2009). From “textual” to “interpersonal”: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica . Journal of Pragmatics, 41 (5), 937–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallage, P. (2008). Jespersen’s Cycle in Middle English: Parametric variation and grammatical competition. Lingua, 118 (5), 643–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiß, H. (1998). Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). A Quantifier Approach to Negation in Natural Languages or Why Negative Concord is Necessary. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 25 (2), 125–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic Properties of Sentential Negation. PhD dissertation: University of Pennsylvania.
(1997). Negation and Clausal Structure. A Comparative Study of Romance Languages. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Sentential Negation. In M. Baltin, & C. Collins, The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory (pp. 511–535). Malden MA, Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. (2004). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord. PhD dissertation: University of Amsterdam.
(2006). The Ban on True Negative Imperatives. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, 6 1, 405–424.Google Scholar
(2009). On French Negation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 35 (1), 447–458. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Negation and negative polarity. In M. D. Dikken, The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax (pp. 793–826). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeli, R. (1968). Spunti per lo studio della negazione nei dialetti del Ticino e del Moesano. Vox Romanica, 27 1, 289–298.Google Scholar