Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Revisiting Shakespeare's Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi, Roberta Facchinetti, Silvia Cacchiani and Antonio Bertacca
[English Text Construction 11:1] 2018
► pp. 1–9
Introduction

Shakespeare’s language revisited in the 21st century

An introduction

 | University of Pavia
 | University of Verona
 | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
 | University of Pisa


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 27 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00001.bai
References (22)
References
Adamson, Sylvia, Lynette Hunter, Lynne Magnusson, Ann Thompson & Katie Wales (eds). 2001. Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide. London: Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C. (ed.). 2010. Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 10). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. An inventory of directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear . In Speech Acts in the History of English, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 85–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. ‘Think on my Words’: Exploring Shakespeare’s Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan (in preparation). Encyclopaedia of Shakespeare’s Language. London: Bloomsbury.
Demmen, Jane E. 2009. Charmed and chattering tongues: Investigating the functions and effects of keyword clusters in the dialogue of Shakespeare’s female characters. Unpublished MA dissertation, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Dowden, Edward. 1877. Shakspere: A Primer. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan. 2010. Shakespeare and Language: Reason, Eloquence and Artifice in the Renaissance. London: Bloomsbury. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kermode, Frank. 2000. Shakespeare’s Language. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lu, Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen. 2016. Shifting viewpoints: How does that actually work across languages? An exercise in parallel text analysis. In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, Barbara Dancygier, Wei-Lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 169–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Russ. 2001. Shakespeare and the Arts of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Post, Jonathan. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of English Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ravassat, Mireille & Jonathan Culpeper. 2011. Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language. Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, David. 2002. Speech and Performance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena & Mick Short. 2004. Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William. 1988a. The Complete Works. Compact Edition. Stanley Wells & Gary Taylor (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1988b. The Complete Works. Electronic Edition. Stanley Wells & Gary Taylor (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce. 2016. The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, Elżbieta. 1993. Cognitive Linguistics and Poetics of Translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar