Introduction published in:
Revisiting Shakespeare's Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi, Roberta Facchinetti, Silvia Cacchiani and Antonio Bertacca
[English Text Construction 11:1] 2018
► pp. 1–9
Introduction

Shakespeare’s language revisited in the 21st century

An introduction

| University of Pavia
| University of Verona
| University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
| University of Pisa
Published online: 27 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00001.bai
References
Adamson, Sylvia, Lynette Hunter, Lynne Magnusson, Ann Thompson & Katie Wales
(eds) 2001 Reading Shakespeare’s Dramatic Language: A Guide. London: Arden Shakespeare.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans C.
(ed.) 2010 Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 10). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich
2002 Linguistic Variation in the Shakespeare Corpus: Morpho-syntactic Variability of Second Person Pronouns. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 An inventory of directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear . In Speech Acts in the History of English, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 85–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2008 ‘Think on my Words’: Exploring Shakespeare’s Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
in preparation). Encyclopaedia of Shakespeare’s Language. London: Bloomsbury.
Demmen, Jane E.
2009 Charmed and chattering tongues: Investigating the functions and effects of keyword clusters in the dialogue of Shakespeare’s female characters. Unpublished MA dissertation, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Dowden, Edward
1877 Shakspere: A Primer. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2002 The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hope, Jonathan
2010 Shakespeare and Language: Reason, Eloquence and Artifice in the Renaissance. London: Bloomsbury. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kermode, Frank
2000 Shakespeare’s Language. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lu, Wei-Lun & Arie Verhagen
2016 Shifting viewpoints: How does that actually work across languages? An exercise in parallel text analysis. In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, Barbara Dancygier, Wei-Lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 169–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Russ
2001 Shakespeare and the Arts of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Post, Jonathan
2013 The Oxford Handbook of English Poetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ravassat, Mireille & Jonathan Culpeper
2011 Stylistics and Shakespeare’s Language. Transdisciplinary Approaches. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Schalkwyk, David
2002 Speech and Performance in Shakespeare’s Sonnets and Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena & Mick Short
2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London and New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William
1988a The Complete Works. Compact Edition. Stanley Wells & Gary Taylor (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1988b The Complete Works. Electronic Edition. Stanley Wells & Gary Taylor (eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce
2016 The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tabakowska, Elżbieta
1993 Cognitive Linguistics and Poetics of Translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar