Article published in:
Revisiting Shakespeare's Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi, Roberta Facchinetti, Silvia Cacchiani and Antonio Bertacca
[English Text Construction 11:1] 2018
► pp. 141168
References

[ p. 161 ]References

Akademichnyj tlumachnyj slovnyk
1970–1980 [Academic Ukrainian Dictionary]. http://​sum​.in​.ua (Last accessed on 13 August 2017).
Baars, Bernard J.
1988A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, Louise
2011Beyond the Brain: How Body and Environment Shape Animal and Human Minds. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Belekhova, Larysa
2002Obraznyj prostir amerykans’koї poeziї: lingvokognityvnyj aspekt [Image space of American poetry: Linguocognitive perspective]. DSc Dissertation. Kyiv National Linguistics University.Google Scholar
2006Kontseptualnyj oksymoron: kreatyvnyj mekhanizm formuvannia novyzny slovesnykh obraziv (na materiali amerykanskoї poeziї) [Conceptual oxymoron: creative mechanism of making verbal images novel (based on American poetry)]. Naukovyj visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu: Seriia “Lingvistyka” [Kherson State University Herald: Linguistics Series]. http://​linguistics​.kspu​.edu​/webfm​_send​/969 (Last accessed on 22 July 2017).
Boyce, Charles
1990Shakespeare A to Z: The Essential Reference to His Plays, His Poems, His Life and Times, and More. New York: Laurel / Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
Brône, Geert & Jeroen Vandaele
(eds) 2009Cognitive Poetics: Goals, Gains, and Gaps. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cornelius, Judson K.
2005 [1998]Literary Humour. Bandra: Better Yourself Books.Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara
2012Negation, stance verbs, and intersubjectivity. In Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds). New York: Cambridge University Press, 69–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elbow, Peter
1993The uses of binary thinking. Journal of Advanced Composition (14): 22–51. http://​scholarworks​.umass​.edu​/eng​_faculty​_pubs​/14 (Last accessed on 8 January 2018).
Estes, Zachary & Thomas B. Ward
2002The emergence of novel attributes in concept modification. Creativity Research Journal 14 (2): 149–156.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Vyv
2007A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles
1994Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles & Mark Turner
2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1982Frame semantics. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, The Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.). Seoul: Hanshin, 111–137.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga C. M.
1997Iconicity in language and literature: Language innovation and language change. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 98: 63–87. https://​pure​.uva​.nl​/ws​/files​/3232869​/3428​_139202​.pdf (Last accessed on 13 August 2017).
Franke, Michael
2008Pseudo-imperatives and other cases of conditional conjunction and conjunctive disjunction. In ‘Subordination’ versus ‘Coordination’. In Sentence and Text: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 255–280.Google Scholar
[ p. 162 ]
Gibbs, Raymond W. Jr.
1993Process and products in making sense of tropes. In Metaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 252–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
2009 [1989]Mind, Code and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. New York and London: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hajičová, Eva
2017Theme. In The Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Linguistics. http://​linguistics​.oxfordre​.com​/view​/10​.1093​/acrefore​/9780199384655​.001​.0001​/acrefore​-9780199384655​-e​-216 (Last accessed on 13 August 2017).Crossref
Harrison, Chloe
2017Cognitive Grammar in Contemporary Fiction. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Chloe, Louise Nuttall, Peter Stockwell & Wenjuan Yuan
(eds) 2014Cognitive Grammar in Literature. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horpynych, Volodymyr
2004Morfolohiia ukraїnskoї movy [Ukrainian Language Morphology]. Kyiv: Akademiia.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura
2007Aspectual clusters of Russian verbs. Studies in Language 31 (3): 607–648.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jarvie, Gordon
2007Bloomsbury Grammar Guide: Grammar Made Easy. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Kaluża, Irena
1984Antithesis – a linguistic approach. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 17: 101–114.Google Scholar
Kolomiiets, Lada V.
2006Dva Leonidy Hrebinky: Do pytannia pro avtentychnyj pereklad i redaktorsku pravku (na materiali perekladu ‘Hamleta’ V. Shekspira) [Two Grebinkas: On authentic translation and editor’s changes (based on W. Shakespeare’s Hamlet)]. Inozemna lologija [Foreign Philology] 40: 31–5.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Zoltán
2010Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
2003Metaphor and semantics. In International Encyclopedia of Linguisitcs: AAVE-Esperanto. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, 53–54.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson
2003 [1980]Metaphors We Live By. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
2007Polysemy, prototypes, and radial categories. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds). New York: Oxford University Press, 139–169.Google Scholar
Lu, Wei-lun & Arie Verhagen
2016Shifting viewpoints: How does that actually work across languages? An exercise in parallel text analysis. In Viewpoint and the Fabric of Meaning: Form and Use of Viewpoint Tools across Languages and Modalities, Barbara Dancygier, Wei-Lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 169–190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lu, Wei-lun, Susanne Kemmer, Svitlana Shurma & Jiří Rambousek
. Under review. Use of translation as a research method in contrastive cognitive poetics: Word formation in Jabberwocky and its Ukrainian translations. Submitted to: Journal of Literary Semantics.
[ p. 163 ]
Lu, Wei-lun, Arie Verhagen & I-wen Su
2018A Multiple-Parallel-Text approach for viewpoint research across languages: The case of demonstratives in English and Chinese. In Expressive Minds and Artistic Creations: Studies in Cognitive Poetics, Szilvia Csábi (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131–158.Google Scholar
Newell, Alex
1965The dramatic context and meaning of Hamlet’s “To Be or Not to Be” soliloquy. PMLA 80 (1): 38–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Plett, Heinrich F.
2010International Studies in the History of Rhetoric. Vol. 2. Literary Rhetoric: Concepts – Structures – Analyses. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ponomariv, Oleksander
2014Blog profesora Ponomareva: pro riznytsiu mizh “chy” ta “abo” [Professor Ponomariv’s blog: on the difference between “chy” and “abo”]. http://​www​.bbc​.com​/ukrainian​/blogs​/2014​/08​/140820​_ponomariv​_blog27​_ko (Last accessed on 13 August 2017).
Preminger, Alex & Terry V. F. Brogan
(eds) 1993The New Princeton Encyclopaedia of Poetry and Poetics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ramshaw, Gail
1996Liturgical Language: Keeping it Metaphoric, Making it Inclusive. Collegeville: The Liturgical Press.Google Scholar
Ross, George
. s.d. [1867] Studies: Biographical and Literary. London: Simpkin, Marshall, & Co.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2000English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena, Zsofia Demjén & Jane E. Demmen
2016An integrated approach to metaphor and framing in cognition, discourse, and practice, with an application to metaphors for cancer. Applied Linguistics 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William
1986Hamlet, prynts datskyj. Tr. by L. Hrebinka. In V. Shekspir. Tvory v shesty tomah [Works in Six Volumes]. Vol. 5. Kyiv: Dnipro, 5–118.Google Scholar
2004Hamlet, prynts danskyj. Tr. by G. Kochur. In U. Shekspir. Tragediї [Tragedies]. Kharkiv: Folio, 165–310.Google Scholar
2008Hamlet, prynts danskyj. Tr. by Yu. Andrukhovych. Kyiv: A-BA-BA-GA-LA-MA-GA.Google Scholar
. (upd. 2008) Act III. Scene 1. Hamlet [online]. http://​www​.shakespeareswords​.com​/Plays​.aspx​?Ac​=3​&SC​=1​&IdPlay​=2#117126 (Last accessed on 31 July 2017).
Shen, Yeshayahu
1997Cognitive constraints on poetic figures. Cognitive Linguistics 8 (1): 33–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Cognitive constraints on verbal creativity: The use of figurative language in poetic discourse. In Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis, Elena Semino & Jonathan Culpeper (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 211–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shulzhuk, Kalenyk
2004Syntaksys ukraїnskoї movy [Syntax of the Ukrainian Language]. Kyiv: Akademiia.Google Scholar
Shurma, Svitlana & Wei-Lun Lu
2016A cognitive poetic analysis of LIFE and DEATH in English and Ukrainian: A Multiple-Parallel-Text approach to Hamlet’s soliloquy. Theatralia 19 (2): 9–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 164 ]
Simpson, Paul
2004Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skidan, Olga
2007Kontrastyvni stylistychni zasoby vtilennia konceptu TVORCHA OSOBYSTIST u hudozhnikh tekstakh U.S. Moema [Contrastive stylistic means that embody the concept CREATIVE PERSONALITY in W.S. Maugham’s novels]. Abstract of PhD Dissertation. Karazin National University of Kharkiv.Google Scholar
2008Hrotesk iak zasib vtilennia konceptu TVORCHA OSOBYSTIST u tvorakh U.S. Moema [Grotesque as a means of CREATIVE PERSONALITY concept embodiment in W.S. Maugham’s works]. Naukovyj Visnyk Khersonskogo derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia: “Linhvistyka” [Kherson State University Herald. Linguistics series], 262–266. http://​linguistics​.kspu​.edu​/webfm​_send​/1268 (Last accessed on 12 August 2017).
2010Kohnityvnyj pidkhid do stylistychnoho analizu anglomovnogo hudozhnioho tekstu [Cognitive approach to stylistic analysis of English literary texts]. Sevastopol: Izdatelstvo SevNTU.Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter
2002Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Albert
1973Word association and creativity. Psychological Reports 33: 3–12 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talanchuk, O.
2002100 najvidomishykh obraziv ukraїnskoї mifolohiї [100 Most Famous Images of Ukrainian Mythology]. Kyiv: Orfej.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2005 [2003]Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tsur, Reuven
1992Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Turner, Mark
2014Blending in language and communication. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter, 211–232. Online version available at https://​papers​.ssrn​.com​/sol3​/papers​.cfm​?abstract​_id​=2487552 (Last accessed on 20 July 2017).
Williamson, Claude C. H.
(ed.) 2005 [1950]Readings on the Character of Hamlet. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar