Article published in:
English Text Construction
Vol. 11:2 (2018) ► pp. 226256
References

References

[ p. 248 ]
Ädel, Annelie
2006Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arons, Wendy
1994Translator’s introduction. In When Midwifery Became the Male Physician’s Province: The Sixteenth Century Handbook The Rose Garden for Pregnant Women and Midwives, Newly Englished, Wendy Arons (trans.). Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 1–25.Google Scholar
Beauvais, Paul J.
1989A speech act theory of metadiscourse. Written Communication 6 (1): 11–30.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
1989Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text & Talk 9 (1): 93–124.Google Scholar
Boggel, Sandra
2008Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English Religious Texts: A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich & Axel Hübler
(eds) 2012Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Harold
2006Medicine. In The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 3: Early Modern Science, Katherine Park & Lorraine Daston (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 407–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crismore, Avon
1989Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York:
Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, Heidrun
2005a‘Form follows function’ in the history of English: The representation of human experience in scientific English. In De Lingua et Litteris: Studia in Honorem Casimiri Andreae Sroka, Danuta Stanulewicz, Roman Kalisz, Wilfried Kürschner & Cäcilia Klaus (eds). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 299–308.Google Scholar
2005bPatterns of agentivity and narrativity in early science discourse. In Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past, Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen & Brita Wårvik (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 83–94.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fissell, Mary E.
2004Vernacular Bodies: The Politics of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flügge, Sibylla
1998Hebammen und heilkundige Frauen: Recht und Rechtswirklichkeit im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Stroemfeld.Google Scholar
Green, Monica H.
2008Making Women’s Medicine Masculine: The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009The sources of Eucharius Rösslin’s ‘Rosegarden for pregnant women and midwives’ (1513). Medical History 53: 167–192.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter J.
2012The nature of knowledge: Evidence and evidentiality in the witness depositions from the Salem witch trials. American Speech 87 (1): 7–38.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 249 ]
Guy, John R.
1982The episcopal licensing of physicians, surgeons and midwives. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 56 (4): 528–542.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed., revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hatipoğlu, Çiler, Erdem Akbaş & Yasemin Bayyurt
(eds) 2017Metadiscourse in Written Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hensel, Cornelia
1988Mittel metakommunikativer Steuerung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 41 (1): 91–101.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, James
1967A sixteenth century midwife’s license. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 41 (1): 75–76.Google Scholar
Hobby, Elaine
2009Introduction. In The Birth of Mankind: Otherwise Named, The Woman’s Book by Thomas Raynalde, Elaine Hobby (ed.). Farnham: Ashgate, xv–xxxix.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly
2005The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37 (9): 1325–1353.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Richard
1540The byrth of mankynde, newly translated out of Laten into Englysshe. London: T R.Google Scholar
Klein, Gustav
1910Eucharius Rösslin’s „Rosengarten“. In Eucharius Rösslin’s „Rosengarten“, gedruckt im Jahre 1513, Gustav Klein (ed.). Munich: Carl Kuhn, iv–xvii.Google Scholar
Kruse, Britta-Juliane
1994Neufund einer handschriftlichen Vorstufe von Eucharius Rößlins Hebammenlehrbuch Der schwangeren Frauen und Hebammen Rosengarten und des Frauenbüchleins Ps.-Ortolfs. Sudhoffs Archiv 78: 220–236.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Mary
2010Medicine and Society in Early Modern Europe. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie
2012Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Tania
2012A Social History of Maternity and Childbirth: Key Themes in Maternity Care. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moessner, Lilo
2008Variation and change in the writings of 17th century scientists. In English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, Vol. II: Lexical and Semantic Change, Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti & Marena Dossena (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–93.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi & Irma Taavitsainen
2010Scientific discourse. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 549–586.Google Scholar
Raynalde, Thomas
2009 [1545]The Birth of Mankind: Otherwise Named, the Woman’s Book, Elaine Hobby (ed.). Farnham: Ashgate. (Hobby’s edition based on 1560 edition.)Google Scholar
Richards, Jennifer
2015Reading and hearing The Womans Booke in early modern England. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 89 (3): 434–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roelcke, Thorsten
2010Fachsprachen. 3rd ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Rösslin, Eucharius
1910 [1513]Der Swangernen frawen vnd Hebammen roszgarten, Gustav Klein (ed.). Munich: Carl Kuhn.Google Scholar
Rösslin, Eucharius (II
) 1532De Partu Hominis. Frankfurt: Egenolphus.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2012Word Smith Tools Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
[ p. 250 ]
Searle, John R.
1984 [1969]Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy G.
1990Medieval & Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2000Metadiscursive practices and the evolution of early English medical writing 1375–1550. In Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (ICAME 1998), John M. Kirk (ed.). Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 191–207.Google Scholar
2001Evidentiality and scientific thought-styles: English medical writing in late Middle English and early modern English. In Modality in Specialized Texts: Selected Papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference, Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena (eds.). Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 21–52.Google Scholar
2012Audience guidance and learned medical writing in Late Medieval English. In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis, Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Françoise Salager-Meyer (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 431–456.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Päivi Pahta
1998Vernacularisation of medical writing in English: A corpus-based study of Scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine 3 (2): 157–185.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Turo Hiltunen
2012 Now as a text deictic feature in Late Medieval and Early Modern English medical writing. In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, Ulrich Busse & Axel Hübler (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 179–205.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J.
1985Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36 (1): 82–93.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wear, Andrew
2000Knowledge & Practice in English Medicine, 1550–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard J.
2016aEvidentiality in Early Modern English medical treatises (1500–1700). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2 (2): 235–263.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016bThe Nottingham Corpus of Early Modern German Midwifery and Women’s Medicine (ca. 1500–1700). Oxford: Oxford Text Archive. http://​ota​.ox​.ac​.uk​/desc​/2562 (Last accessed on 5 September 2017).
Wiesner, Mary E.
1983Early Modern midwifery: A case study. International Journal of Women’s Studies 6 (2): 26–43.Google Scholar
Williams, Joseph M.
1981aLiterary style: The personal voice. In Style and Variables in English, Timothy Shopen & Joseph M. Williams (eds). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop, 117–216.Google Scholar
1981bStyle: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.Google Scholar
Woolley, Benjamin
2004The Herbalist: Nicholas Culpeper and the Fight for Medical Freedom. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
[ p. 251 ]