Article published in:
English Text Construction
Vol. 11:2 (2018) ► pp. 226–256

“And all this is spoken of the naturall byrth …”

Metadiscourse in The Birth of Mankind and its German source text, Rosengarten

| The University of Nottingham
This paper provides an examination of the use of metadiscourse in the two versions of The Birth of Mankind, the first midwifery manual to be printed in English during the sixteenth century. It is a translation of a Latin text, which itself is a translation of the German Rosengarten. While much has been made of the differences in the use of medical terminology in various versions, little attention has been paid to what differences – if any – exist in the ways the various authors/translators signal text structure or use other overt markers to the reader as to how the text is to be read or understood. Corpus linguistic methods are employed to provide a quantitative angle on the analysis of these texts.
Keywords: metadiscourse, midwifery, The Birth of Mankind , translation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical background to Rosengarten and The Birth of Mankind
  • 3.What is metadiscourse?
  • 4.Methodology and the classification of metadiscourse markers
    • 4.1Attention-guiding markers
    • 4.2Comprehension-guiding markers
    • 4.3Code glosses
    • 4.4Framing markers
    • 4.5Structuring markers
    • 4.6Restricting markers
    • 4.7Intratextual markers
    • 4.8Intertextual markers
    • 4.9Stance markers
  • 5.Results and discussion
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00010.whi
References
Ädel, Annelie
2006 Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arons, Wendy
1994 Translator’s introduction. In When Midwifery Became the Male Physician’s Province: The Sixteenth Century Handbook The Rose Garden for Pregnant Women and Midwives, Newly Englished, Wendy Arons (trans.). Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, 1–25.Google Scholar
Beauvais, Paul J.
1989 A speech act theory of metadiscourse. Written Communication 6 (1): 11–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2006 Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approach. Text & Talk 26 (6): 635–660. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
1989 Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text & Talk 9 (1): 93–124.Google Scholar
Boggel, Sandra
2008 Metadiscourse in Middle English and Early Modern English Religious Texts: A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Busse, Ulrich & Axel Hübler
(eds) 2012 Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cook, Harold
2006 Medicine. In The Cambridge History of Science. Vol. 3: Early Modern Science, Katherine Park & Lorraine Daston (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 407–434. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crismore, Avon
1989 Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, Heidrun
2005a ‘Form follows function’ in the history of English: The representation of human experience in scientific English. In De Lingua et Litteris: Studia in Honorem Casimiri Andreae Sroka, Danuta Stanulewicz, Roman Kalisz, Wilfried Kürschner & Cäcilia Klaus (eds). Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 299–308.Google Scholar
2005b Patterns of agentivity and narrativity in early science discourse. In Opening Windows on Texts and Discourses of the Past, Janne Skaffari, Matti Peikola, Ruth Carroll, Risto Hiltunen & Brita Wårvik (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 83–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fissell, Mary E.
2004 Vernacular Bodies: The Politics of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Flügge, Sibylla
1998 Hebammen und heilkundige Frauen: Recht und Rechtswirklichkeit im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt: Stroemfeld.Google Scholar
Green, Monica H.
2008 Making Women’s Medicine Masculine: The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009 The sources of Eucharius Rösslin’s ‘Rosegarden for pregnant women and midwives’ (1513). Medical History 531: 167–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter J.
2012 The nature of knowledge: Evidence and evidentiality in the witness depositions from the Salem witch trials. American Speech 87 (1): 7–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guy, John R.
1982 The episcopal licensing of physicians, surgeons and midwives. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 56 (4): 528–542.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd ed., revised by Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hatipoğlu, Çiler, Erdem Akbaş & Yasemin Bayyurt
(eds) 2017 Metadiscourse in Written Genres: Uncovering Textual and Interactional Aspects of Texts. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hensel, Cornelia
1988 Mittel metakommunikativer Steuerung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 41 (1): 91–101.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, James
1967 A sixteenth century midwife’s license. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 41 (1): 75–76.Google Scholar
Hobby, Elaine
2009 Introduction. In The Birth of Mankind: Otherwise Named, The Woman’s Book by Thomas Raynalde, Elaine Hobby (ed.). Farnham: Ashgate, xv–xxxix.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2005 Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly
2005 The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37 (9): 1325–1353. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jonas, Richard
1540 The byrth of mankynde, newly translated out of Laten into Englysshe. London: T R.Google Scholar
Klein, Gustav
1910 Eucharius Rösslin’s „Rosengarten“. In Eucharius Rösslin’s „Rosengarten“, gedruckt im Jahre 1513, Gustav Klein (ed.). Munich: Carl Kuhn, iv–xvii.Google Scholar
Kruse, Britta-Juliane
1994 Neufund einer handschriftlichen Vorstufe von Eucharius Rößlins Hebammenlehrbuch Der schwangeren Frauen und Hebammen Rosengarten und des Frauenbüchleins Ps.-Ortolfs. Sudhoffs Archiv 781: 220–236.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Mary
2010 Medicine and Society in Early Modern Europe. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie
2012 Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Tania
2012 A Social History of Maternity and Childbirth: Key Themes in Maternity Care. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moessner, Lilo
2008 Variation and change in the writings of 17th century scientists. In English Historical Linguistics 2006: Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, Vol. II: Lexical and Semantic Change, Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti & Marena Dossena (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 75–93.Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi & Irma Taavitsainen
2010 Scientific discourse. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 549–586.Google Scholar
Raynalde, Thomas
2009 [1545] The Birth of Mankind: Otherwise Named, the Woman’s Book, Elaine Hobby (ed.). Farnham: Ashgate. (Hobby’s edition based on 1560 edition.)Google Scholar
Richards, Jennifer
2015 Reading and hearing The Womans Booke in early modern England. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 89 (3): 434–462. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roelcke, Thorsten
2010 Fachsprachen. 3rd ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Rösslin, Eucharius
1910 [1513] Der Swangernen frawen vnd Hebammen roszgarten, Gustav Klein (ed.). Munich: Carl Kuhn.Google Scholar
Rösslin, Eucharius (II
) 1532 De Partu Hominis. Frankfurt: Egenolphus.Google Scholar
Scott, Mike
2012 Word Smith Tools Version 6. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1984 [1969] Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siraisi, Nancy G.
1990 Medieval & Early Renaissance Medicine: An Introduction to Knowledge and Practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma
2000 Metadiscursive practices and the evolution of early English medical writing 1375–1550. In Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Papers from the Nineteenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerised Corpora (ICAME 1998), John M. Kirk (ed.). Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 191–207.Google Scholar
2001 Evidentiality and scientific thought-styles: English medical writing in late Middle English and early modern English. In Modality in Specialized Texts: Selected Papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference, Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena (eds.). Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 21–52.Google Scholar
2012 Audience guidance and learned medical writing in Late Medieval English. In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis, Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Françoise Salager-Meyer (eds). Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 431–456.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Päivi Pahta
1998 Vernacularisation of medical writing in English: A corpus-based study of Scholasticism. Early Science and Medicine 3 (2): 157–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma & Turo Hiltunen
2012  Now as a text deictic feature in Late Medieval and Early Modern English medical writing. In Investigations into the Meta-Communicative Lexicon of English: A Contribution to Historical Pragmatics, Ulrich Busse & Axel Hübler (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 179–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vande Kopple, William J.
1985 Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 36 (1): 82–93. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wear, Andrew
2000 Knowledge & Practice in English Medicine, 1550–1680. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitt, Richard J.
2016a Evidentiality in Early Modern English medical treatises (1500–1700). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2 (2): 235–263. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016b The Nottingham Corpus of Early Modern German Midwifery and Women’s Medicine (ca. 1500–1700). Oxford: Oxford Text Archive. http://​ota​.ox​.ac​.uk​/desc​/2562 (Last accessed on 5 September 2017).
Wiesner, Mary E.
1983 Early Modern midwifery: A case study. International Journal of Women’s Studies 6 (2): 26–43.Google Scholar
Williams, Joseph M.
1981a Literary style: The personal voice. In Style and Variables in English, Timothy Shopen & Joseph M. Williams (eds). Cambridge, MA: Winthrop, 117–216.Google Scholar
1981b Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co.Google Scholar
Woolley, Benjamin
2004 The Herbalist: Nicholas Culpeper and the Fight for Medical Freedom. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

No author info given
2021.  In The Sociopragmatics of Stance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 329], Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.