Article published in:
Grammar, usage and discourse: Functional studies offered to Kristin Davidse
Edited by Lieven Vandelanotte, Wout Van Praet and Lieselotte Brems
[English Text Construction 10:2] 2017
► pp. 187198
References

References

Aspeslagh, Ellen
1999Language as ideology: Transitivity and ergativity in the female voices of Virginia Woolf's The Waves . PALA Occasional Papers 10. Available online at http://​www​.pala​.ac​.uk​/uploads​/2​/5​/1​/0​/25105678​/paper10​.pdf (Last accessed on 27 June 2017).Google Scholar
Brazil, David
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine
2010English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammatical Uses (Topics in English Linguistics 63). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
2016The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20 (2): 221–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2011Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English (Topics in English Linguistics 74). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craps, Geert
1999Structuur en Textuur: Thema en Cohesie in Nederlandse Expositorische Teksten. Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde (KANTL).Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1991Categories of experiential grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven. Published as: Davidse, Kristin. 1999. Categories of Experiential Grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 11). Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University, Department of English and Media Studies.
1994Language and world view in the poetry of G. M. Hopkins. In Acknowledged Legislators: Essays on English Literature in Honour of Herman Servotte, Ortwin de Graef, Vik Doyen, Erik Hertog, Guido Latré & Hedwig Schwall (eds). Kapellen: Pelckmans, 104–119.Google Scholar
1998On transitivity and ergativity in English, or on the need for dialogue between schools. In English as a Human Language: To Honor Louis Goossens, Johan Van der Auwera, Frank Durieux & Ludo Lejeune (eds). München: LINCOM Europa, 95–108.Google Scholar
1999The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 10 (3): 203–250.Google Scholar
2000A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 38 (6): 1101–1131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.Google Scholar
2009 Complete and sort of: From identifying to intensifying? Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3): 262–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
(eds) 2010Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 66). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans
(eds) 2012Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections (Studies in Language Companion Series 130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte
(eds) 2014Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Ditte Kimps & Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende
2016Making the case for defining clefts broadly as secondary specification structures: Prosody and information structure. Paper presented at the Second Round Table on Communicative Dynamism, University of Namur, 13-14 September 2016.
Davies, Eirian C.
2015 [1979]On the Semantics of Syntax: Mood and Condition in English (Routledge Library Editions: The English Language 8). London: Routledge. (Original edition London: Croom Helm.)Google Scholar
2017The significance of theme. English Text Construction 10 (2) :298–322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Elements of English Functional Grammar: A Set-Theoretical Approach (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 280). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Firth, John Rupert
1957Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2016The factive-reported distinction in English: Representational and interpersonal semantics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
Ghesquière, Lobke
2014The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase: Pathways of Change (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 267). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Kristin Davidse
2011The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15 (2): 251–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2003A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English (Cognitive Linguistics Research 26). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kimps, Ditte
Forthcoming. Tag Questions in Conversation: A Typology of Their Interactional and Stance Meanings (Studies in Corpus Linguistics). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Laffut, An
2006Three-Participant Constructions in English: A Functional-Cognitive Approach to Caused Relations (Studies in Language Companion Series 79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Grounding, semantic functions, and absolute quantifiers. English Text Construction 10 (2) :233–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
2008Complementation as interpersonal grammar. Word 59 (1-2): 25–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Optionality in grammar and language use. Linguistics 51 (6): 1147–1204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage. English Text Construction 10 (2) :199–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2017Co-occurrence and iteration of intensifiers in Early English. English Text Construction 10 (2) :249–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary
1976Existential Sentences in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
1977Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013Key Concepts in Phonetics and Phonology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2017Theme and prosody: Redundancy or meaning making? English Text Construction 10 (2) :274–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwall, Hedwig
2017Towards a new grammar of interiority: James Ramsay’s circuitous way To the Lighthouse . English Text Construction 10 (2) :323–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation (Describing English language). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2002Systemic-functional linguistics and the notion of grammatical metaphor: A theoretical study and a proposal for a semiotic-functional integrative model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghent.
Forthcoming. Grammatical Metaphor as a Construction Type: A Semiotic-Functional Model (Discussions in Functional Approaches to Language). Sheffield: Equinox.
Tobin, Vera
2010Joint attention, To the Lighthouse, and modernist representations of intersubjectivity. English Text Construction 3 (2): 185–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2002‘But forced to qualify’: Distancing speech and thought representation as a symptom of uninformedness in Larkin. Leuvense Bijdragen (Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology) 91 (3–4): 383–426. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-Functional Approach (Topics in English Linguistics 65). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven, Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens & Ditte Kimps
(eds) 2014Recent Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Developing and Exploiting Corpora (Language & Computers 78). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse
(eds) 2010Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research (Typological Studies in Language 94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Praet, Wout, Kristin Davidse, Ditte Kimps & Lieven Vandelanotte
2016The information structure of copular clauses. Paper presented at the Second Round Table on Communicative Dynamism, University of Namur, 13-14 September 2016.
Van Rompaey, Tinne
2013The development of P + NP + of/to + V(-ing) progressive aspect markers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English (Topics in English Linguistics 55). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willemse, Peter
2005Nominal reference-point constructions: Possessive and esphoric NPs in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lastres-López, Cristina
2020. Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 157  pp. 68 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.