Article published In:
Grammar, usage and discourse: Functional studies offered to Kristin Davidse
Edited by Lieven Vandelanotte, Wout Van Praet and Lieselotte Brems
[English Text Construction 10:2] 2017
► pp. 187198
References
Aspeslagh, Ellen
1999Language as ideology: Transitivity and ergativity in the female voices of Virginia Woolf's The Waves . PALA Occasional Papers 101. Available online at [URL] (Last accessed on 27 June 2017).Google Scholar
Brazil, David
1997The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine
2010English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammatical Uses (Topics in English Linguistics 63). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
2016The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20 (2): 221–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2011Layering of Size and Type Noun Constructions in English (Topics in English Linguistics 74). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Craps, Geert
1999Structuur en Textuur: Thema en Cohesie in Nederlandse Expositorische Teksten. Gent: Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde (KANTL).Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1991Categories of experiential grammar. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven. Published as: Davidse, Kristin. 1999. Categories of Experiential Grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 11). Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University, Department of English and Media Studies.
1994Language and world view in the poetry of G. M. Hopkins. In Acknowledged Legislators: Essays on English Literature in Honour of Herman Servotte, Ortwin de Graef, Vik Doyen, Erik Hertog, Guido Latré & Hedwig Schwall (eds). Kapellen: Pelckmans, 104–119.Google Scholar
1998On transitivity and ergativity in English, or on the need for dialogue between schools. In English as a Human Language: To Honor Louis Goossens, Johan Van der Auwera, Frank Durieux & Ludo Lejeune (eds). München: LINCOM Europa, 95–108.Google Scholar
1999The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 10 (3): 203–250.Google Scholar
2000A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 38 (6): 1101–1131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.Google Scholar
2009 Complete and sort of: From identifying to intensifying? Transactions of the Philological Society 107 (3): 262–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens
(eds) 2010Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (Topics in English Linguistics 66). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans
(eds) 2012Grammaticalization and Language Change: New Reflections (Studies in Language Companion Series 130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Caroline Gentens, Lobke Ghesquière & Lieven Vandelanotte
(eds) 2014Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 63). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidse, Kristin, Ditte Kimps & Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende
2016Making the case for defining clefts broadly as secondary specification structures: Prosody and information structure. Paper presented at the Second Round Table on Communicative Dynamism, University of Namur, 13-14 September 2016.
Davies, Eirian C.
2015 [1979]On the Semantics of Syntax: Mood and Condition in English (Routledge Library Editions: The English Language 8). London: Routledge. (Original edition London: Croom Helm.) DOI logo DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017The significance of theme. English Text Construction 10 (2) :298–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Elements of English Functional Grammar: A Set-Theoretical Approach (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 280). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Firth, John Rupert
1957Papers in Linguistics 1934–1951. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2016The factive-reported distinction in English: Representational and interpersonal semantics. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
Ghesquière, Lobke
2014The Directionality of (Inter)subjectification in the English Noun Phrase: Pathways of Change (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 267). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Kristin Davidse
2011The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15 (2): 251–277. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st ed. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, Liesbet
2003A Cognitive-Functional Approach to Nominalization in English (Cognitive Linguistics Research 26). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kimps, Ditte
Forthcoming. Tag Questions in Conversation: A Typology of Their Interactional and Stance Meanings (Studies in Corpus Linguistics). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo DOI logo
Laffut, An
2006Three-Participant Constructions in English: A Functional-Cognitive Approach to Caused Relations (Studies in Language Companion Series 79). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Grounding, semantic functions, and absolute quantifiers. English Text Construction 10 (2) :233–248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William B.
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
2008Complementation as interpersonal grammar. Word 59 (1-2): 25–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Optionality in grammar and language use. Linguistics 51 (6): 1147–1204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2017Co-occurrence and iteration of intensifiers in Early English. English Text Construction 10 (2) :249–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milsark, Gary
1976Existential Sentences in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
1977Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 31: 1–29.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2013Key Concepts in Phonetics and Phonology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2017Theme and prosody: Redundancy or meaning making? English Text Construction 10 (2) :274–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwall, Hedwig
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation (Describing English language). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2002Systemic-functional linguistics and the notion of grammatical metaphor: A theoretical study and a proposal for a semiotic-functional integrative model. Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghent.
Forthcoming. Grammatical Metaphor as a Construction Type: A Semiotic-Functional Model (Discussions in Functional Approaches to Language). Sheffield: Equinox.
Tobin, Vera
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2002‘But forced to qualify’: Distancing speech and thought representation as a symptom of uninformedness in Larkin. Leuvense Bijdragen (Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology) 91 (3–4): 383–426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Speech and Thought Representation in English: A Cognitive-Functional Approach (Topics in English Linguistics 65). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven, Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens & Ditte Kimps
(eds) 2014Recent Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Developing and Exploiting Corpora (Language & Computers 78). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van linden, An, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse
(eds) 2010Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research (Typological Studies in Language 94). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Praet, Wout, Kristin Davidse, Ditte Kimps & Lieven Vandelanotte
2016The information structure of copular clauses. Paper presented at the Second Round Table on Communicative Dynamism, University of Namur, 13-14 September 2016.
Van Rompaey, Tinne
2013The development of P + NP + of/to + V(-ing) progressive aspect markers. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English (Topics in English Linguistics 55). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willemse, Peter
2005Nominal reference-point constructions: Possessive and esphoric NPs in English. Doctoral dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lastres-López, Cristina
2020. Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 157  pp. 68 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.