Cover not available
Article published In:
Interdisciplinary approaches to the language of pop culture
Edited by Rocío Montoro and Valentin Werner
[English Text Construction 16:2] 2023
► pp. 214–237

Chick Lit

Characterisation through laughter-talk in conversational humour

| University of Granada
| University of Granada
In this paper, we look at characterisation in the popular fiction genre Chick Lit by analysing laughter-talk in conversational humour. This is the first systematic analysis of how a variety of humour phenomena are linguistically realised in the genre despite humour being as aspect recurrently referred to as intrinsic to the genre. We use a combination of methods, both corpus-based and qualitative in nature, to identify instances in which laughter occurs, which we (broadly) associate with the presence of humour. Thus, with the use of self-compiled corpora, we assess the nature of humorous mechanisms in the genre. We conclude by arguing that humorous encounters are genre-defining and essential for characterisation. Humour analysis allows us to argue that Chick Lit protagonists are prototypically presented as non-aggressive, non-threatening individuals, which also contributes to the depiction of down-to-earth characters readers expect in the genre.
Keywords: humour, corpus-based analysis, popular fiction, female writing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Chick Lit and conversational humour through laughter-talk
  • 3.Methodology, data and research questions
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Corpus-based analysis
    • 4.2Conversational humour
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 29 February 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.22028.mon
References (41)
References
Archer, Dawn, Andrew Wilson & Paul Rayson. 2002. Introduction to the USAS category system. [URL]
Attardo, Salvatore. 2020. The linguistics of humor. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and ridicule: Toward a social critique of humour. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chick Lit Books, [URL] (21 November 2022)
Chick Lit Writers, [URL] (21 November 2022)
Colston, Herbert & Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. Contrast and pragmatics in figurative language: Anything understatement can do, irony can do better. Journal of Pragmatics 32(11). 1557–1583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Ted. 1993. Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1). 61–74.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2009. Beyond a joke: Types of conversational humour. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5). 1284–1299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Joker in the pack: Towards determining the status of humorous framing in conversations. In Marta Dynel (ed.), The pragmatics of humour across discourse domains, 217–241. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Humorous phenomena in dramatic discourse. European Journal of Humour Research 1(1). 22–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. But seriously: On conversational humour and (un)truthfulness. Lingua 1971. 83–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferris, Suzanne & Mallory Young. 2006a. Introduction. In Suzanne Ferris & Mallory Young (eds.), 1–13.Google Scholar
(eds.). 2006b. Chick Lit: The new woman’s fiction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In Charlotte Taylor & Anna Marchi (eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review, 225–258. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gelder, Ken. 2004. Popular fiction: The logics and practices of a literary field. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2014. Log ratio: An informal introduction. ESRC Centre for Corpus Approaches to Social Science (CASS). [URL] (08 January 2021)
Harzewski, Stephanie. 2011. Chick Lit and postfeminism. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Hewett, Heather. 2006. You are not alone: The personal, the political and the “new” Mommy Lit. In Suzanne Ferris & Mallory Young (eds.), 119–139.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga. 2000. Gender and joking: On the complexities of women’s image politics in humorous narratives. Journal of Pragmatics 32(1). 55–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Pragmatics of performance and the analysis of conversational humour. Humor 191. 217–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Oral genres of humor: On the dialectic of genre knowledge and creative authoring. Pragmatics 17(2). 263–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lampert, Martin D. & Susan M. Ervin-Tripp. 2006. Risky laughter: Teasing and self-directed joking among male and female friends. Journal of Pragmatics 38(1). 51–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lucariello, Joan. 1994. Situational irony: A concept of events gone awry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 123(2). 129–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marszalek, Agnes. 2019. Constructing inferiority through comic characterisation: Self-deprecating humour and cringe comedy in High Fidelity and Bridget Jones’s Diary . In Benedict Neurohr & Lizzie Stewart-Shaw (eds.), Experiencing fictional worlds, 119–134. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, Rod A. 2007. The psychology of humor: An integrative approach. Burlington, MA: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Missler, Heike. 2016. The cultural politics of Chick Lit: Popular fiction, postfeminism and representation. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montoro, Rocío. 2007. Stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction: A socio-cognitive perspective. In Marina Lambrou & Peter Stockwell (eds.), Contemporary stylistics, 68–80. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
. 2012. Chick Lit: The stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal. 1993. Conversational joking: Humor in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Involvement and joking in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 22(3–4). 409–430. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Non-verbal humor and joke performance. Humor 17(4). 401–409. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Jeremy. 1991. Potboilers: Methods, concepts and case studies in popular fiction. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan. 2006. The linguistics of laughter. A corpus-assisted study of laughter-talk. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. From Wodehouse to the White House: A corpus-assisted study of play, fantasy and dramatic incongruity in comic writing and laughter-talk. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 4(2). 189–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rayson, Paul. 2008. From key words to key semantic domains. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 13(4). 519–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider-Mayerson, Matthew. 2010. Popular fiction studies: The advantages of a new field. Studies in Popular Culture 33(1). 21–35. [URL]
Sinkeviciute, Valeria & Marta Dynel. 2017. Approaching conversational humour culturally: A survey of the emerging area of investigation. Language & Communication 551. 1–9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Juliette. 2006. Mothers of Chick Lit? Women writers, readers and literary history. In Suzanne Ferris & Mallory Young (eds.), 47–70.Google Scholar
Yardley, Cathy. 2006. Will write for shoes: How to write a Chick Lit novel. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf & S. Holly Stocking. 1976. Putdown humor. Journal of Communication 26(3). 154–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Avner. 1984. Personality and sense of humor. New York: Springer.Google Scholar