This article offers some background on notions related to intersubjectivity in applied linguistics, specifically as studied in EAP. The study takes a reflexive approach to metadiscourse, investigating audience orientation in three monologic academic genres: advanced student writing, published academic prose and spoken lectures. Specifically, audience orientation involving second person you is examined from the perspective of the discourse functions in which the word is involved. A randomly selected dataset of 150 examples from each of the three genres was coded for metadiscursive functions, applying Ädel’s (2010) taxonomy. The results showed that the distribution of discourse functions was similar in the three registers; however, the highest frequency of metadiscourse was found in the spoken lectures, not in the written modes.
2023. İKİNCİ/YABANCI DİL OLARAK TÜRKÇE ÖĞRETİMİ BAĞLAMINDA ÜSTSÖYLEM VE AKADEMİK DİNLEME İLİŞKİSİ. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi (HÜTAD) :39 ► pp. 171 ff.
Xu, Jun & Yuxiao Liang
2023. Negotiating intersubjectivity by interpersonal and appraisal shifts in Chinese-English government press conference interpreting. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Yu, Yang & Gang Zeng
2023. Lesser relevance markers in Chinese academic spoken English corpus: a cross-disciplinary study on pragmatic features. Frontiers in Psychology 14
Salama, Amir H. Y.
2022. Cross-textual reconceptualisation of the deictic space of “victory” in political discourse: Donald Trump versus Joseph Biden. Discourse and Interaction 15:1 ► pp. 101 ff.
Wu, Xinxin & He Yang
2022. Unpacking the Functions of Personal Metadiscourse in Teachers’ Classroom Discourse. Sustainability 14:20 ► pp. 13502 ff.
Kashiha, Hadi
2021. Stance-taking across monologic and dialogic modes of academic speech. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 39:4 ► pp. 352 ff.
Kashiha, Hadi
2022. On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse practices in political speeches. Discourse and Interaction 15:1 ► pp. 77 ff.
Kashiha, Hadi
2022. Academic lectures versus political speeches: Metadiscourse functions affected by the role of the audience. Journal of Pragmatics 190 ► pp. 60 ff.
Nesi, Hilary & Sian Alsop
2021. Stories and scenarios: Lecturers’ use of fantastic hypothetical events. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 53 ► pp. 101022 ff.
Zhang, Dongyun & Diyun Sheng
2021. EFL Lecturers’ Metadiscourse in Chinese University MOOCs Across Course Types. Corpus Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 243 ff.
Zhang, Dongyun & Diyun Sheng
2023. A Contrastive Analysis of Metadiscourse by Native and EFL Lecturers in Chinese University MOOCs. In New Trends on Metadiscourse, ► pp. 129 ff.
Zare, Javad
2020. Awareness of discourse organizers and comprehension of academic lectures: The effect of using concordancers. Current Psychology 39:2 ► pp. 419 ff.
Cirillo, Letizia
2019. The pragmatics of air quotes in English academic presentations. Journal of Pragmatics 142 ► pp. 1 ff.
Hyland, Ken
2017. Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?. Journal of Pragmatics 113 ► pp. 16 ff.
Janier, Mathilde & Chris Reed
2017. I didn’t say that! Uses of SAY in mediation discourse. Discourse Studies 19:6 ► pp. 619 ff.
Rozumko, Agata
2017. Adverbial Markers of Epistemic Modality Across Disciplinary Discourses: A Contrastive Study of Research Articles in Six Academic Disciplines. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 52:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Zare, Javad & Zahra Keivanloo-Shahrestanaki
2017. The language of English academic lectures: The case of field of study in highlighting importance. Lingua 193 ► pp. 36 ff.
Zare, Javad & Mansoor Tavakoli
2017. The Use of Personal Metadiscourse over Monologic and Dialogic Modes of Academic Speech. Discourse Processes 54:2 ► pp. 163 ff.
Ädel, Annelie
2017. Remember that your reader cannot read your mind: Problem/solution-oriented metadiscourse in teacher feedback on student writing. English for Specific Purposes 45 ► pp. 54 ff.
Malmström, Hans
2016. Engaging the Congregation: The Place of Metadiscourse in Contemporary Preaching. Applied Linguistics 37:4 ► pp. 561 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.