Cover not available
Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 1–8

The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause

Introduction

Published online: 30 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.01cla
References (20)
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brazil, David. 1995. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, Deirdre. 1978. Towards an analysis of casual conversation. Nottingham Linguistic Circular 7 (2): 131–164.Google Scholar
Daneš, František. 1974. Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). Prague: Academia, 106–128.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1971. On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theory of functional sentence perspective. Sbornik prací filosofické fakulti brnenské university 19 (71): 135–144.Google Scholar
. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fries, Peter. 1995. Themes, methods of development, and texts. In On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 317–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edition. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1981. What’s going on: A dynamic view of context. In The Seventh LACUS Forum, James E. Copeland & Philip W. Davis (eds). Columbia: Hornbeam Press, 106–121.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2008. Functional Discourse Grammar: A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman & Morris Halle. 1956. Fundamentals of Language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 1985. Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol. 11, James D. Benson & William S Greaves (eds). Norwood: Ablex, 248–274.Google Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém. 1911. O potenciálnosti jevů jazykových [On the potentiality of the phenomena of language]. Věstník Královské české společnosti nauk, 1911–12, třída filozoficko-historicko-jazykozpytná, č. 2, únor 1911: 1–24. English translation in A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, Josef Vachek (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–32.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Michael. 1999. Context in dynamic modelling. In Text and Context in Functional Linguistics, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 63–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. A dynamic view of choice in writing: Composition as text evolution. In Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring Choice, Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given–new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.). New York: Academic Press, 223–255.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John McH. & Anna Mauranen. 2006. Linear Unit Grammar. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Van Praet, Wout
2019. Focus assignment in English specificational and predicative clauses: intonation as a cue to information structure?. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51:2 ► pp. 222 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.