Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 115142
References (41)
Bicler, Chris & Kristin Davidse
2010It-clefts in casual conversational English: The weakening of their specificational meaning. In Distinctions in English Grammar. Offered to Renaat Declerck, Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds). Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 260–277.Google Scholar
Budts, Sara, Michelle Peeters & Elisah Van Lommel
2013Existential there-clefts revisited. Unpublished term paper. University of Leuven.
Carlson, Greg
1978Reference to Kinds in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet
2000Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
1991Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Cleft existentials in English. Language Sciences 141: 419–433. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006It-clefts and wh-clefts: Prosody and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 1706–1720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1992Existential constructions: A systemic perspective. Leuvense Bijdragen 811: 71–99.Google Scholar
1999aAre there sentences that can be analyzed as there-clefts? In Thinking English Grammar: To Honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus, Guy Tops, Betty Devriendt & Steven Geukens (eds). Leuven: Peeters, 177–193.Google Scholar
1999bThe semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 101: 203–250.Google Scholar
2000A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 381: 1101–1131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind. CSDL 2002, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Ditte Kimps
2014Distinguishing and subclassifying there-clefts. Paper presented at ICAME 351. Nottingham, 29 April–4 May 2014.
Declerck, Renaat
1984The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua 641: 251–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy
1992Properties of it-cleft presupposition. Journal of Semantics 91: 289–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2015The discursive status of extraposed object clauses. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 221. [URL] (Last accessed on 24 December 2015).
Halliday, M.A.K
1967aNotes on transitivity and theme in English 2. Journal of Linguistics 31: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1967bIntonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & William Greaves
2008Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy
2000The referential status of clefts. Language 761: 891–920. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Francis
1973The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Huddleston, Rodney
1984Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2004It-extraposition and Non-extraposition in English: A Study of Syntax in Spoken and Written Texts. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 391: 463–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1978Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings 4: 114–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Patten, Amanda
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rando, Emily & Donna Napoli
1978Definites in there-sentences. Language 541: 300–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reeve, Matthew
2011The syntactic structure of English clefts. Lingua 1211: 142–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 251: 701–721. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tench, Paul
1996The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (12)

Cited by 12 other publications

Carlier, Anne & Karen Lahousse
2023. Chapter 5. Presentational clefts, existentials and information structure. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76],  pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Introduction. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Conclusion. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts,  pp. 155 ff. DOI logo
Davidse, Kristin, Ngum Meyuhnsi Njende & Gerard O’Grady
2023. Structural Assemblies and Semantics of the Four Existential Constructions with Relative Clause. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts,  pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Gentens, Caroline, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor & An Van linden
2023. Introduction. Reconnecting form and meaning. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2023. Chapter 1. On the use of there -clefts with zero subject relativizer. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230],  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
van Praet, Wout
2023. Referential accessibility as an index of the discourse functions of predicative and specificational clauses. Text & Talk 43:1  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Jourdain, Morgane
2022. The emergence of Information Structure in child speech: the acquisition ofc’est-clefts in French. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1  pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Lahousse, Karen
2022. Is focus a root phenomenon?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],  pp. 148 ff. DOI logo
Cruschina, Silvio
2018. Setting the boundaries. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
2018. Non-prototypical clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Destruel, Emilie
2017. The pragmatics of French (non-)prototypical clefts: Influence of the type of question on naturalness and interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 121  pp. 58 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.