In this article we present functional-structural and information structure arguments for recognizing specificational there-clefts, i.e. clefts that specify a value for a variable. We distinguish two types which hinge on whether the matrix is a listing or a canonical existential. Listing there-clefts enumerate one or more instances as corresponding to the variable, e.g. You are quite right David, it was engineered, seems there’s only me and you who can see this. Quantifying there-clefts indicate the quantity of instantiation of the variable, e.g. Look at the shape of it. There’s only one thing that’s that shape.
Bicler, Chris & Kristin Davidse. 2010. It-clefts in casual conversational English: The weakening of their specificational meaning. In Distinctions in English Grammar. Offered to Renaat Declerck, Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds). Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 260–277.
Budts, Sara, Michelle Peeters & Elisah Van Lommel. 2013. Existential there-clefts revisited. Unpublished term paper. University of Leuven.
Carlson, Greg. 1978. Reference to Kinds in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet. 2000. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Collins, Peter. 1991. Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge.
Collins, Peter. 1992. Cleft existentials in English. Language Sciences 141: 419–433.
Collins, Peter. 2006. It-clefts and wh-clefts: Prosody and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 1706–1720.
Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Davidse, Kristin. 1999a. Are there sentences that can be analyzed as there-clefts? In Thinking English Grammar: To Honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus, Guy Tops, Betty Devriendt & Steven Geukens (eds). Leuven: Peeters, 177–193.
Davidse, Kristin. 1999b. The semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 101: 203–250.
Davidse, Kristin. 2000. A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 381: 1101–1131.
Davidse, Kristin. 2004. The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind. CSDL 2002, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.
Davidse, Kristin & Ditte Kimps. 2014. Distinguishing and subclassifying there-clefts. Paper presented at
ICAME
351. Nottingham, 29 April–4 May 2014.
Declerck, Renaat. 1984. The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua 641: 251–289.
Delin, Judy. 1992. Properties of it-cleft presupposition. Journal of Semantics 91: 289–306.
Gentens, Caroline. 2015. The discursive status of extraposed object clauses. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 221. [URL] (Last accessed on 24 December 2015).
Halliday, M.A.K. 1967a. Notes on transitivity and theme in English 2. Journal of Linguistics 31: 199–244.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1967b. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.
Halliday, M.A.K. & William Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
Hedberg, Nancy. 2000. The referential status of clefts. Language 761: 891–920.
Higgins, Francis. 1973. The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Huddleston, Rodney. 1984. Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2004. It-extraposition and Non-extraposition in English: A Study of Syntax in Spoken and Written Texts. Wien: Braumüller.
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 391: 463–516.
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rando, Emily & Donna Napoli. 1978. Definites in there-sentences. Language 541: 300–313.
Reeve, Matthew. 2011. The syntactic structure of English clefts. Lingua 1211: 142–171.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 251: 701–721.
Tench, Paul. 1996. The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2007. Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Harder, Peter
2024. Reconnecting form and meaning. In honour of Kristin Davidse. Studies in language companion series 230. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 56:1 ► pp. 87 ff.
2023. Structural Assemblies and Semantics of the Four Existential Constructions with Relative Clause. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 75 ff.
Gentens, Caroline, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor & An Van linden
2017. The pragmatics of French (non-)prototypical clefts: Influence of the type of question on naturalness and interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 121 ► pp. 58 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.