Article published in:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 115142
References
Bicler, Chris & Kristin Davidse
2010It-clefts in casual conversational English: The weakening of their specificational meaning. In Distinctions in English Grammar. Offered to Renaat Declerck, Bert Cappelle & Naoaki Wada (eds). Tokyo: Kaitakusha, 260–277.Google Scholar
Budts, Sara, Michelle Peeters & Elisah Van Lommel
2013Existential there-clefts revisited. Unpublished term paper. University of Leuven.
Carlson, Greg
1978Reference to Kinds in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro & Sally McConnell-Ginet
2000Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter
1991Cleft and Pseudo-cleft Constructions in English. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Cleft existentials in English. Language Sciences 141: 419–433. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006It-clefts and wh-clefts: Prosody and pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 381: 1706–1720. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
1969Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1992Existential constructions: A systemic perspective. Leuvense Bijdragen 811: 71–99.Google Scholar
1999aAre there sentences that can be analyzed as there-clefts? In Thinking English Grammar: To Honour Xavier Dekeyser, Professor Emeritus, Guy Tops, Betty Devriendt & Steven Geukens (eds). Leuven: Peeters, 177–193.Google Scholar
1999bThe semantics of cardinal versus enumerative existential constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 101: 203–250.Google Scholar
2000A constructional approach to clefts. Linguistics 381: 1101–1131. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind. CSDL 2002, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin & Ditte Kimps
2014Distinguishing and subclassifying there-clefts. Paper presented at ICAME 351. Nottingham, 29 April–4 May 2014.
Declerck, Renaat
1984The pragmatics of it-clefts and wh-clefts. Lingua 641: 251–289. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy
1992Properties of it-cleft presupposition. Journal of Semantics 91: 289–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2015The discursive status of extraposed object clauses. Leuven Working Papers in Linguistics 221. http://​www​.arts​.kuleuven​.be​/ling​/workingpapers (Last accessed on 24 December 2015).
Halliday, M.A.K
1967aNotes on transitivity and theme in English 2. Journal of Linguistics 31: 199–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1967bIntonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & William Greaves
2008Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hedberg, Nancy
2000The referential status of clefts. Language 761: 891–920. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Francis
1973The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Huddleston, Rodney
1984Introduction to the Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2004It-extraposition and Non-extraposition in English: A Study of Syntax in Spoken and Written Texts. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud
1994Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001A framework for the analysis of cleft constructions. Linguistics 391: 463–516. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, William
1997Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1978Secondary predicates. Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings 4: 114–127. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar
Patten, Amanda
2012The historical development of the it-cleft: A comparison of two different approaches. Studies in Language 361: 548–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rando, Emily & Donna Napoli
1978Definites in there-sentences. Language 541: 300–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reeve, Matthew
2011The syntactic structure of English clefts. Lingua 1211: 142–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
2002Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 251: 701–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tench, Paul
1996The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy. Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Cruschina, Silvio
2018. Setting the boundaries. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo
Destruel, Emilie
2017. The pragmatics of French (non-)prototypical clefts: Influence of the type of question on naturalness and interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 121  pp. 58 ff. Crossref logo
Jourdain, Morgane
2022. The emergence of Information Structure in child speech: the acquisition of c’est-clefts in French. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
2018. Non-prototypical clefts. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Lahousse, Karen
2022.  In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273],  pp. 148 ff. Crossref logo
Van Praet, Wout
2022. Referential accessibility as an index of the discourse functions of predicative and specificational clauses. Text & Talk 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.