Article published in:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 143164
References

References

Andersen, Thomas Hestbaek, Morten Boeris, Eva Maagerø & Elise Seip Tønnessen
2015Social Semiotics: Key Figures, New Directions. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arús Hita, Jorge
2007On the aboutness of theme. In Proceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN Conference, María Losada, Pilar Ron, Sonia Hernández & Jorge Casanova (eds). Huelva: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Huelva. https://​www​.researchgate​.net​/publication​/235345776​_On​_the​_aboutness​_of​_Theme (Last accessed on 29 December 2015).Google Scholar
Bartlett, Tom
2015Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of Mode. In Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan: Society in Language, Language in Society, Wendy Bowcher & Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds). London and New York: Palgrave, 166–183.Google Scholar
Berry, Margaret
1996What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. In Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Perspectives, Robin P. Fawcett, Margaret Berry, Christopher Butler & Guowen W. Huang (eds). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1–64.Google Scholar
Caffarel, Alice, James R. Martin & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
(eds) 2004Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004aForeword. In Caffarel, et al., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective, xi–xiii. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004bIntroduction. In Caffarel, et al., Language Typology: A Functional Perspective, 1–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cloran, Carmel
2010Rhetorical unit analysis and Bakhtin’s chronotope. Functions of Language 17 (1): 9–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 6). University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1974Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). The Hague: Mouton, 106–128.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P.
2003The many types of ‘Theme’ in English: Their semantic systems and functional syntax. Unpublished mimeo. http://​www​.isfla​.org​/Systemics​/Print​/Papers​.html (Last accessed on 30 December 2015).Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1992aFunctional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992bOn some basic problems of functional sentence perspective. In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds). London: Pinter, 167–188.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter
1995Themes, methods of development, and texts. In On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 317–360. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The textual metafunction as a site for the discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. In Text Type and Structure, Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds). London and Oakville: Equinox, 8–44.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael
1988Generic situation and register: A functional view of communication. In Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective, James D. Benson, Michael Cummings & William Greaves (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 301–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K.
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K & Ruqayia Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Jonathan J. Webster
2014Text Linguistics: The How and Why of Meaning. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Flora
2009Còco is Crùbagan. Cocoa and Crabs. A Hebridean Childhood. South Lochs: Islands Books Trust.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Lachlan J.
2009Aspects of the interpersonal grammar of Gaelic. Linguistics 47 (4): 885–911. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, Iain
2009Cogadh Ruairidh. Dingwall: Sandstone Press.Google Scholar
Mann, William C., Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen & Sandra Thompson
1992Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 39–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém
1964On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English. In A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, Josef Vachek (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 59–67.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: the Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1993What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Framing in Discourse, Deborah Tannen (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 14–56.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Wegener, Rebekah
2019. What makes a text a text?. Functions of Language 26:1  pp. 28 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 november 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.