Cover not available
Article published In:
The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause
Edited by Ben Clarke and Jorge Arús-Hita
[English Text Construction 9:1] 2016
► pp. 143–164

Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text

In this paper I explore the etic category of textuality and the emic category of Theme arguing that while Theme in English may simultaneously signal the point of departure of a clause with respect to the preceding text and also the ‘aboutness’ of the clause in relation to the method of development of a text, this is not necessarily the case with other languages. In particular I consider the rich textual resources of Scottish Gaelic, a verb-initial language with no morphological marking for Theme, to problematise standard treatments of thematicity in languages other than English. I elaborate on Cloran’s (2010) account of Rhetorical Units to present as a hypothesis for further exploration the idea that, while Gaelic and English ground clauses in both space and time, Gaelic is a process-centred language while English is a Subject-centred language and that these differences in the respective characterology of the two languages have repercussions on the process of textualisation and the method of development in each language.

Keywords: Rhetorical Unit, Gaelic, Theme, textuality, textualisation
Published online: 30 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.9.1.08bar
References
Andersen, Thomas Hestbaek, Morten Boeris, Eva Maagerø & Elise Seip Tønnessen
2015 Social Semiotics: Key Figures, New Directions. London and New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arús Hita, Jorge
2007 On the aboutness of theme. In Proceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN Conference, María Losada, Pilar Ron, Sonia Hernández & Jorge Casanova (eds). Huelva: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Huelva. [URL] (Last accessed on 29 December 2015).Google Scholar
Bartlett, Tom
2015 Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of Mode. In Essays in Honour of Ruqaiya Hasan: Society in Language, Language in Society, Wendy Bowcher & Jennifer Yameng Liang (eds). London and New York: Palgrave, 166–183.Google Scholar
Berry, Margaret
1996 What is Theme? A(nother) personal view. In Meaning and Form: Systemic Functional Perspectives, Robin P. Fawcett, Margaret Berry, Christopher Butler & Guowen W. Huang (eds). Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1–64.Google Scholar
Caffarel, Alice, James R. Martin & Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen
(eds) 2004 Language Typology: A Functional Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004a Foreword. In Caffarel, et al., xi–xiii. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b Introduction. In Caffarel, et al., 1–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cloran, Carmel
2010 Rhetorical unit analysis and Bakhtin’s chronotope. Functions of Language 17 (1): 9–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Rhetorical Units and Decontextualisation: An Enquiry into some Relations of Context, Meaning and Grammar (Monographs in Systemic Linguistics 6). University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Daneš, František
1974 Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, František Daneš (ed.). The Hague: Mouton, 106–128.Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P
2003 The many types of ‘Theme’ in English: Their semantic systems and functional syntax. Unpublished mimeo. [URL] (Last accessed on 30 December 2015).Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan
1992a Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992b On some basic problems of functional sentence perspective. In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds). London: Pinter, 167–188.Google Scholar
Fries, Peter
1995 Themes, methods of development, and texts. In On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter Fries (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 317–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The textual metafunction as a site for the discussion of the goals of linguistics and techniques of linguistic analysis. In Text Type and Structure, Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds). London and Oakville: Equinox, 8–44.Google Scholar
Gregory, Michael
1988 Generic situation and register: A functional view of communication. In Linguistics in a Systemic Perspective, James D. Benson, Michael Cummings & William Greaves (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 301–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K & Ruqayia Hasan
1976 Cohesion in English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2004 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edition. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Jonathan J. Webster
2014 Text Linguistics: The How and Why of Meaning. Sheffield and Bristol: Equinox.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Flora
2009 Còco is Crùbagan. Cocoa and Crabs. A Hebridean Childhood. South Lochs: Islands Books Trust.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Lachlan J
2009 Aspects of the interpersonal grammar of Gaelic. Linguistics 47 (4): 885–911. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacLean, Iain
2009 Cogadh Ruairidh. Dingwall: Sandstone Press.Google Scholar
Mann, William C., Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen & Sandra Thompson
1992 Rhetorical structure theory and text analysis. In Discourse Description: Diverse Linguistic Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text, William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 39–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, Vilém
1964 On linguistic characterology with illustrations from Modern English. In A Prague School Reader in Linguistics, Josef Vachek (ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 59–67.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Gerard
2010 A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: the Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1993 What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Framing in Discourse, Deborah Tannen (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 14–56.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Arús-Hita, Jorge
2022. A contrastive look at Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing. English Text Construction 15:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Bartlett, Tom
2021. Interpersonal Grammar in Scottish Gaelic. In Interpersonal Grammar, ► pp. 257 ff. DOI logo
Bartlett, Tom
2023. Chapter 3. Atopicality as the unmarked logical structure in Scottish Gaelic. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 71 ff. DOI logo
Bowcher, Wendy L.
2021. Context of situation and the role of language. Functions of Language 28:3 ► pp. 315 ff. DOI logo
Gentens, Caroline, Lobke Ghesquière, William B. McGregor & An Van linden
2023. Introduction. Reconnecting form and meaning. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Wegener, Rebekah
2019. What makes a text a text?. Functions of Language 26:1 ► pp. 28 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Looking ahead: systemic functional linguistics in the twenty-first century. In The Routledge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, ► pp. 658 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.