This paper investigates whether colloquialisation – a stylistic shift by which written genres come to be more similar to spoken genres – has played a role in the endonormativisation of the grammar of Australian English, a variety which has long been noted for its penchant for colloquialism. The study tracks changes in grammatical colloquialism from the early 20th century against the historical backdrop of the progressive decline in Britishness in Australia and the pervasive effects of “Americanisation”. The data are derived from a suite of parallel Brown-family corpora representing British, American, and Australian English of the 1930s, 1960s, 1990s and 2006. Multivariate techniques are used to delimit 26 “colloquial” and “anti-colloquial” grammatical features from a set of 83 potentially relevant features, and to examine changes in their frequencies between 1931 and 2006, in the three varieties, and across the three major genres of fiction, learned writing and press reportage.
1959The Drum: Australian Character and Slang. Sydney: Currawong.
Biber, Douglas
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas
2003 “Compressed Noun Phrases in Newspaper Discourse: The Competing Demands of Popularization vs. Economy”. In Jean Aitchison, and Diana Lewis, eds. New Media Language. London: Routledge, 169–181.
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan
1997 “Diachronic Relations among Speech-Based and Written Registers in English”. In Terttu Nevalainen, and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, eds. To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen. Helsinki: Société Neophilologique, 253–275.
Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad
2009Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, and Bethany Gray
2016Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Blair, David
1993 “Australian English and Australian National Identity”. In Gerhard Schultz, ed. The Languages of Australia. Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities, 62–70.
2015b “Diachronic Variation in the Grammar of Australian English: Corpus-Based Explorations”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 15–42.
Collins, Peter, and David Blair
2000 “Language and Identity in Australia”. In David Blair, and Peter Collins, eds. English in Australia. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1–13.
2001Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Curran, James
2004The Power of Speech: Australian Prime Ministers Defining the National Image. Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
Hackert, Stephanie, and Dagmar Deuber
2015 “American Influence on Written Caribeanbean English: A Diachronic Analysis of Newspaper Reportage in the Bahamas and in Trinidad and Tobago”. In Peter Collins, ed. Grammatical Change in English World-Wide. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 389–410.
Hornadge, Bill
1980The Australian Slanguage. Sydney: Methuen Australia.
Hundt, Marianne
2013 “The Diversification of English: Old, New, and Emerging Epicentres”. In Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, eds. English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 182–203.
2012 “Differential Change in British and American English: Comparing Pre- and Post-War Data”. In Sebastian Hoffmann, Paul Rayson, and Geoffrey Leech, eds. English Corpus Linguistics: Looking back, Moving forward. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 79–101.
Hundt, Marianne, and Geoffrey Leech
2012 “Small is Beautiful: On the Value of Standard Reference Corpora for Observing Recent Grammatical Change”. In Terttu Nevalainen, and Elizabeth Traugott, eds. The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–188.
Hundt, Marianne, Gerold Schneider, and Elena Seoane
2016 “The Use of the be-Passive in Academic Englishes: Local vs Global Usage in an International Language”. Corpora 111: 31–63. [10.3366/corp.2016.0084]
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey, and Nicholas Smith
2009 “Change and Constancy in Linguistic Change: How Grammatical Usage in Written English Evolved in the Period 1931–1991”. In Antoinette Renouf, and Andrew Kehoe, eds. Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 173–200.
Mair, Christian
2009Twentieth-Century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mair, Christian, and Marianne Hundt
1995 “Why is the Progressive Becoming more Frequent in English? A Corpus-Based Investigation of Language Change in Progress”. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 431: 111–122
2019. AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 43:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Kruger, Haidee & Adam Smith
2018. Colloquialization versus Densification in Australian English: A Multidimensional Analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
Kruger, Haidee, Bertus van Rooy & Adam Smith
2019. Register Change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901-2015). Journal of English Linguistics 47:3 ► pp. 183 ff.
2020. Linguistic Colloquialisation, Democratisation and Gender in Asian Englishes. In Gender in World Englishes, ► pp. 176 ff.
Yao, Xinyue & Peter Collins
2019. Developments in Australian, British, and American English Grammar from 1931 to 2006: An Aggregate, Comparative Approach to Dialectal Variation and Change. Journal of English Linguistics 47:2 ► pp. 120 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.