Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 44:1 (2023) ► pp.91–117

The ages of pragmatic particles in Colloquial Singapore English

A corpus study based on oral history interviews

| University of Kiel
| University of Giessen
| University of Hamburg
The study aims to work towards a diachronic reconstruction of pragmatic particles in Colloquial Singapore English (CSE, also known as “Singlish”) by exploiting an unused historical data source: The Oral History Interviews held by the National Archives of Singapore (OHI-NAS). We investigate the distribution of five pragmatic particles (ah, lah, leh, lor, and meh) in 101 interviews conducted between 1979 and 2009 in speakers born between 1899 and 1983. Lim (2007) reconstructs the origin of these particles in different substrate languages, with the first two particles (ah and lah) being traceable to earlier Bazaar Malay and/or Hokkien, while the latter three (leh, lor, and meh) are of later Cantonese origin. The results of the present study show that ah and lah are the most frequent particles attested earliest. Their frequency of use increases over time, being additionally contingent on the gender and age of the speakers, their educational level, and their ethnic background. The particles ah and lah are mostly used in assertive contexts.
Keywords: Colloquial Singapore English, diachronic reconstruction, Oral History Interviews, pragmatic particles
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The form, function, and distribution of pragmatic particles in CSE
  • 3.The rise of pragmatic particles in relation to the linguistic ecology in Singapore in different historical stages
  • 4.Database and methodology
    • 4.1Oral history interviews
    • 4.2Methodology
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Year of birth versus pragmatic particles
    • 5.2Age versus pragmatic particles
    • 5.3Interview year versus pragmatic particles
    • 5.4Particle functions
    • 5.5Association with gender, ethnicity, and education
    • 5.6Random forest
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1The origin of the particles
    • 6.2The influence of gender and level of education
    • 6.3The influence of ethnic background
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 20 September 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.21016.li
References (56)
Sources
OHI-NAS. 2020. Oral History Interviews. Online Archives. National Archives of Singapore, 2020, <[URL]> (accessed September 9, 2021).
References
Ansaldo, Umberto. 2004. “The Evolution of Singapore English: Finding the Matrix”. In Lisa Lim, ed. Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 129–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2005. “The Aspectual System of Singapore English and the Systemic Substratist Explanation”. Journal of Linguistics 411: 237–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The Making of Vernacular Singapore English: System, Transfer and Filter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming, and Huaqing Hong. 2006. “Diglossia and Register Variation in Singapore English”. World Englishes 251: 105–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bao, Zhiming. 2021. The Origins of Singapore English: A Sociohistorical Sketch”. In Peter Siemund, and Jakob R. E. Leimgruber, eds. Multilingual Global Cities: Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai. London: Routledge, 19–37.Google Scholar
Baskaran, Lohanayahi. 1987. “Aspects of Malaysian English Syntax”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of London.
Botha, Werner. 2018. “A Social Network Approach to Particles in Singapore English”. World Englishes 371: 261–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buschfeld, Sarah. 2021. “Multilingual Language Acquisition in Singapore”. In Peter Siemund, and Jakob R. E. Leimgruber, eds. Multilingual Global Cities: Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai. London: Routledge, 205–228.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, Francesco, and Bee Chin Ng. 2021. “Multilingualism and Multiculturalism in Singapore”. In Peter Siemund, and Jakob R. E. Leimgruber, eds. Multilingual Global Cities: Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai. London: Routledge, 133–159.Google Scholar
Chua, Vincent. 2015. “How do Singaporeans Connect? Ties among Chinese, Malays, and Indians”. American Behavioral Scientist 591: 1115–1128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, L. Quentin. 2005. “Bilingual Education Policy in Singapore: An Analysis of its Sociohistorical Roots and Current Academic Outcomes”. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 81: 25–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Anthea F. 1989. “Singapore Colloquial English and Standard English”. Singapore Journal of Education 101: 33–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992. “The Pragmatic Particles of Singapore Colloquial English”. Journal of Pragmatics 181: 31–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. The Step-Tongue: Children’s English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Greenwell, Brandon M. 2017. “pdp: An R Package for Constructing Partial Dependence Plots”. The R Journal 91: 421–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harell, Frank E. Jr. 2019. Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous . R package version 4.2.0. <[URL]>. (accessed December 13, 2020).
Haugen, Einar. 1972. The Ecology of Language. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, Charles. 1986. “The Making of Race in Colonial Malaya: Political Economy and Racial Ideology”. Sociological Forum 11: 330–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ho, Mian Lian, and John T. Platt. 1993. Dynamics of a Contact Continuum: Singaporean English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, Brian W. 1953. “Racial Groupings in Singapore”. Malayan Journal of Tropical Geography 11: 25–36.Google Scholar
Klöter, Henning, and Mårten Söderblom Saarela, eds. 2020. Language Diversity in the Sino-Phone World. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwan-Terry, Anna. 1978. “The Meaning and the Source of the ‘la’ and the ‘what’ Particles in Singapore English”. RELC Journal 91: 22–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. “The Specification of Stage by a Child Learning English and Cantonese Simultaneously: A Study of Acquisition Processes”. In Hans W. Dechert, and Manfred Raupach, eds. Interlingual Processes. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 33–48.Google Scholar
Lee, Edmond Eu Fah. 2001. “Profile of the Singapore Chinese Dialect Groups”. Department of Statisitcs, Singapore, 2001, <[URL]> (accessed December 30, 2020).
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E. 2013. Singapore English: Structure, Variation, and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016. “ Bah in Singapore English”. World Englishes 351: 78–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leimgruber, Jakob R. E., Jun Jie Lim, Wilkinson Gonzales, Daniel Wong, and Mie Hiramoto. 2020. “Ethnic and Gender Variation in the Use of Colloquial Singapore English Discourse Particles”. English Language and Linguistics: 1–20.Google Scholar
LePoer, Barbara Leitch, ed. 1991. Singapore: A Country Study (2nd ed.). Washington: Federal Research Division, Library of Congress.Google Scholar
Ler, Vivien Soon Lay. 2005. “An In-Depth Study of Discourse Particles in Singapore English”. Ph.D. Dissertation, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Ler, Soon Lay Vivien. 2006. “A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to Discourse Particles in Singapore English”. In Kerstin Fischer, ed. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 149–166.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2021. “Conditional Inference Trees and Random Forests”. In Magali Paquot, and Stefan Gries, eds. Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics. New York: Springer, 607–640.Google Scholar
Li, Lijun. 2021. “Language Contact: A Historical Sociolinguistic Reconstruction of Colloquial Singapore English in Relation to its Chinese Substrates”. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Hamburg.
Li, Lijun, and Peter Siemund. 2021. “From Phasal Polarity Expression to Aspectual Marker: Grammaticalization of ‘already’ in Asian and African Varieties of English”. In Raija Kramer, ed. The Expression of Phasal Polarity in African Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 509–537. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa, ed. 2004. Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. “Mergers and Acquisitions: On the Ages and Origins of Singapore English Particles”. World Englishes 261: 446–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Migrants and ‘Mother Tongues’: Extralinguistic Forces in the Ecology of English in Singapore”. In Lisa Lim, Anne Pakir, and Lionel Wee, eds. English in Singapore: Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 19–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Low, Ee Ling, and David Deterding. 2003. “A Corpus-Based Description of Particles in Spoken Singapore English”. In Ee Ling Low, and David Deterding, eds. English in Singapore: Research on Grammar. Singapore: McGraw Hill, 58–66.Google Scholar
Mair, Victor. H. 2013. “The Classification of Sinitic Languages: What is ‘Chinese’?”. In Guangshun Cao, Hilary Chappell, Redounane Djamouri, and Thekla Wiebusch, eds. Breaking Down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond. Taipei: Academia Sinica, 735–754.Google Scholar
Platt, John T. 1975. “The Singapore English Speech Continuum and Its Basilect ‘Singlish’ as a ‘Creoloid’”. Anthropological Linguistics 171: 363–374.Google Scholar
Platt, John T., and Mian Lian Ho. 1989. “Discourse Particles in Singaporean English: Substratum Influences and Universals”. World Englishes 81: 215–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Version 3.5.1 <[URL]>.
Richards, Jack C., and Mary Tay. 1977. “The la Particle in Singapore English”. In William J. Crewe, ed. The English Language in Singapore. Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 141–155.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter, and Lijun Li. 2017. “Towards a Diachronic Reconstruction of Colloquial Singapore English”. In Debra Ziegeler, and Zhiming Bao, eds. Negation and Contact. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 11–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter, Monika E. Schulz, and Martin Schweinberger. 2014. “Studying the Linguistic Ecology of Singapore: A Comparison of College and University Students”. World Englishes 331: 340–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter, and Jakob R. E. Leimgruber, eds. 2021. Multilingual Global Cities: Singapore, Hong Kong, Dubai. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smakman, Dick, and Stephanie Wagenaar. 2013. “Discourse Particles in Colloquial Singapore English: Discourse Particles in Colloquial Singapore English”. World Englishes 321: 308–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Anne-Laure Boulesteix, Thomas Kneib, Thomas Augustin, and Achim Zeileis. 2008. “Conditional Variable Importance for Random Forests”. BMC Bioinformatics 91: 307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., and R. Harald, Baayen. 2012. “Models, Forests, and Trees of York English: Was/Were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical Practice”. Language Variation and Change 241: 135–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tan, Charlene, and Pak Tee Ng. 2011. “Functional Differentiation: A Critique of the Bilingual Policy in Singapore”. Journal of Asian Public Policy 41: 331–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teo, Ming Chew. 2020. Crosslinguistic Influence in Singapore English: Linguistic and Social Aspects. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wee, Lionel. 2004. “Reduplication and Discourse Particles”. In Lisa Lim, ed. Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 105–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “The Particle ya in Colloquial Singapore English”. World Englishes 291: 45–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Jock. 2005. “‘Why you so Singlish one?’ A Semantic and Cultural Interpretation of the Singapore English Particle One”. Language in Society 341: 239–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wong, Wee Kim. 2021. Census of Population 2020 Statistical Release 1: Demographic Characteristics, Education, Language and Religion. Singapore: Department of Statistics Singapore.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Botha, Werner & Tobias Bernaisch
2024. Social network effects on particle variation among Singapore students. World Englishes DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.