The get-passive in Tyneside English
A highly frequent yet constrained variant
This paper provides a quantitative variationist analysis of the distribution of get- versus
be-passives in spoken Tyneside English. Taking data from the Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside
English (1960s to 2010), the paper uses mixed-effects modelling to examine a wide range of possible constraints on
the distribution of get versus be, some of which have been discussed at length in the literature
on the get-passive (e.g. subject animacy, adversative semantics) and some of which have received less attention
(e.g. grammatical person, tense, aspectuality). It demonstrates that the use of the get-passive is determined by
a complex combination of semantic and syntactic factors (subject animacy, telicity, non-neutral semantics, tense and grammatical
person). Moreover, it argues that, despite the dramatic rise in frequency of get-passives over time (with younger
speakers using them even more frequently than be-passives), most of the constraints remain in place and the
variant is pragmatically marked. This stands in sharp contrast to the findings of recent investigations into the
grammaticalization of get-passives in standard British and American English, which found that increased frequency
in those varieties was also accompanied by semantic bleaching and generalization.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The get-passive and its origins
- 3.The get-passive in Tyneside: Data collection and analysis
- 3.1Data collection: DECTE
- 3.2Contexts for the variation of get versus be
- 3.2.1Animacy of subject
- 3.2.2Semantic context
- 3.2.3Aspectuality
- 3.2.4Presence of a human by-agent
- 3.2.5Tense and grammatical person
- 3.2.6Other syntactic variables
- 3.2.7Sociolinguistic factors
- 4.Results
- 4.1Overall frequency analysis
- 4.2Multivariate analysis
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
Sources
-
References
References (36)
Sources
Corrigan, Karen P., Isabelle Buchstaller, Adam J. Mearns, and Hermann L. Moisl. 2012. The
Diachronic Electronic Corpus of Tyneside English. <[URL]>
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2017. “GET, GET-Constructions and the GET-Passive in 19th-Century English: Corpus Analysis and Prescriptive Comments”. In Sebastian Hoffmann, Andrea Sand, and Sabine Arndt-Lappe, eds. Exploring Recent Diachrony: Corpus Studies of Lexicogrammar and Language Practices in Late Modern English. Helsinki: Helsinki University.
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written
English. London: Longman.
Biggs, Alison, and David Embick. 2021. “On
the Event Structural Properties of the English Get-Passive”. Linguistic
Inquiry.
Bybee, Joan L. 2003. “Mechanisms of Change in
Grammaticalization: The Role of Frequency”. In Brian D. Joseph, and Richard D. Janda, eds. The
Handbook of Historical
Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 602–623.
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy. 1999. “The
English Get-Passive in Spoken Discourse: Description and Implications for an Interpersonal
Grammar”. English Language and
Linguistics 31: 41–58.
Chappell, Hilary. 1980. “Is
the Get-Passive Adversative?” Language and Social
Interaction 131: 411–452.
Collins, Peter C. 1996. “
Get-Passives
in English”. World
Englishes 151: 43–56.
Coto Villalibre, Eduardo. 2015. “Is
the Get-Passive Really That Adversative?” Miscelánea: A Journal of English and
American
Studies 511: 13–30.
Downing, Angela. 1996. “The
Semantics of Get-Passives”. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran, and David G. Butt, eds. Functional
Descriptions: Theory in Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179–205.
Fleisher, Nicholas. 2006. “The
Origin of Passive GET”. English Language and
Linguistics 101: 225–252.
Givón, T., and Lynne Yang. 1994. “The
Rise of the English GET-Passive”. In Barbara A. Fox, and Paul J. Hopper, eds. Voice:
Form and Function. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 119–149.
Haegeman, Liliane. 1985. “The
Get-Passive and Burzio’s
Generalization”. Lingua 661: 53–77.
Hatcher, Anna G. 1949. “To Get/Be
Invited”. Modern Language
Notes 641: 433–446.
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey Pullum. 2002. The
Cambridge Grammar of the English
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hundt, Marianne. 2007. English
Mediopassive Constructions. A Cognitive, Corpus-based Study of their Origin, Spread, and Current
Status. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic
Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Labov, William. 2001. Principles
of Linguistic Change. Volume 2: Social Factors. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell.
Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair, and Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change
in Contemporary English. A Grammatical
Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 1991. Locating Dialect in Discourse: The
Language of Honest Men and Bonnie Lassies in Ayr. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mair, Christian, and Geoffrey Leech. 2006. “Current
Changes in English Syntax”. In Bas Aarts, and April M. S. McMahon, eds. The
Handbook of English
Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 318–342.
R Core Team. 2014. R: A Language and
Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. [URL]
Rühlemann, Christoph. 2007. “Lexical
Grammar: The GET-Passive as a Case in Point”. ICAME
Journal 311: 111–127.
Sasaki, Kazutaka. 1999. “The
Semantics of Get-Passives”. Journal of the Faculty of International Studies, Utsunomiya
University 81: 117–126.
Sawasaki, Koichi. 2000. “On
Adversity in English Get-Passives”. J. Hokkaido
Linguist 11: 15–28.
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Harald C. Baayen. 2012. “Models,
Forests and Trees of York English: Was/Were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical
Practice”. Language Variation and
Change 241: 135–178.
Thompson, Dominic, S. P. Ling, Andriy Myachykov, Fernanda Ferreira, and Christoph Scheepers. 2013. “Patient-Related
Constraints on Get- and Be-Passive Uses in English: Evidence from Paraphrasing”. Frontiers in
Psychology 41: 848.
Thompson, Dominic, Fernanda Ferreira, and Christoph Scheepers. 2018. “One
Step at a Time: Representational Overlap Between Active Voice, Be-Passive, and Get-Passive Forms in
English”. Journal of
Cognition 11: 35.
Toyota, Junichi. 2008. Diachronic
Change in the English Passive. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Hundt, Marianne, Bethany Dallas & Shimon Nakanishi
2024.
The be‐ versusget‐passive alternation in world Englishes.
World Englishes 43:1
► pp. 86 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.