Vol. 45:2 (2024) ► pp.–
Constrained communication in EFL and ESL
The case of embedded inversion
This study relies on the constrained communication framework to compare the use of embedded inversion in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English as a Second Language (ESL). It is based on several (sub)corpora of EFL and ESL, but also reference corpora of native English, which differ along the constraint dimensions of language activation (monolingual/bilingual), proficiency (native users/proficient L2 users/learners), and modality (speech/writing). In addition to these constraint dimensions, we also investigate the possible effect of linguistic factors that have been claimed to play a role in the use of embedded inversion. A multifactorial analysis comparing embedded inversion with standard-like indirect questions, supplemented by a close examination of the patterns of use of embedded inversion, reveals both shared and distinctive features across EFL and ESL. It also highlights the importance of linguistic factors and variety/L1, and their interaction with communicative constraints.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Embedded inversion as object of study
- 3.Constrained communication framework
- 4.Data, research questions, and methods
- 5.Results
- 5.1Multifactorial analysis
- 5.2Linguistic contexts and patterns of use of embedded inversion
- 6.Discussion and conclusion
- Acknowledgments
- Notes
-
Sources -
References
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.23001.gil