Article In:
English World-Wide: Online-First Articles

Conventionalization and variation in computer-mediated communication

New perspectives on Nigerian Pidgin spelling

ORCID logo | University of Muenster
ORCID logo | University of Muenster
ORCID logo | University of Bremen
This paper investigates spelling practices in Nigerian Pidgin (NigP) computer-mediated communication (CMC) as well as Nigerians’ perceptions of these. The first part is a corpus-based analysis. It shows that conventionalization of spelling variants is taking place in the absence of formal standardization. Furthermore we observe the application of general CMC respelling strategies, e.g. vowel reduction. The second part is a survey study where participants were asked to judge the correctness of spelling variants. When the corpus results indicated the existence of a conventionalized spelling, the participants tended to either endorse this or, when shown an alternative, suggest it as the correct form; items that are more variable in the corpus yielded more mixed results. We apply and elaborate on the notion of “standardization from below” (Elspaß 2021) and we argue that the existence of conventionalized NigP spellings makes possible deviations from these in CMC-typical fashion just as in Standard English.
Keywords: Nigerian Pidgin, spelling variation, standardization, computer-mediated communication, corpus, survey
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Corpus study
  • 4.Survey
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Author queries
  • References
This content is being prepared for publication; it may be subject to changes.
References (24)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2006. Introduction: Sociolinguistics and computer-mediated communication. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(4): 419–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar. 2005. Nigerian Pidgin in Lagos language contact, variation and change in an African urban setting. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Deuber, Dagmar & Lars Hinrichs. 2007. Dynamics of orthographic standardization in Jamaican Creole and Nigerian Pidgin. World Englishes 26(1): 22–47. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Jacob. 2015. Systematic patterning in phonologically-motivated orthographic variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2): 161–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2021. Language Standardization in a View ‘from Below.’ In Wendy Ayres-Bennett & John Bellamy, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Language Standardization (1st edn). Cambridge University Press, 93–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elugbe, Ben. 2008. Nigerian Pidgin English: phonology. In Rajend Mesthrie, Bernd Kortmann & Edgar W. Schneider, eds. Varieties of English 4 Africa, South and Southeast Asia. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, 55–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faraclas, Nicholas. 1996. Nigerian Pidgin. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heyd, Theresa. 2016. Global varieties of English gone digital: Orthographic and semantic variation in digital Nigerian Pidgin. In Lauren Squires, ed. English in Computer-Mediated Communication Variation, Representation, and Change (vol. 931). De Gruyter, 101–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars. 2004. Emerging orthographic conventions in written Creole: computer-mediated communication in Jamaica. AAA: Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik: 81–109.Google Scholar
Hinrichs, Lars & Jessica White-Sustaíta. 2011. Global Englishes and the sociolinguistics of spelling: A study of Jamaican blog and email writing. English World-Wide 32(1): 46–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holm, John A. 1988. Pidgins and Creoles Volume 1. Theory and Structure (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kassambara, Alboukadel & Fabian Mundt. 2019. factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. [URL]
Lê, Sébastien, Julie Josse & François Husson. 2008. FactoMineR: A Package for Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Statistical Software 25(1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James. 2002. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4): 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The ideology of the standard language. In Carmen Llamas, Louise Mullany & Peter Stockwell, eds. The Routledge Companion to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge, 133–139.Google Scholar
Mühleisen, Susanne. 2022. Genre in World Englishes: Case studies from the Caribbean (Varieties of English Around the World; Vol. G67). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oenbring, Raymond. 2013. Bey or bouy: Orthographic patterns in Bahamian Creole English on the web. English World-Wide 34(3): 341–364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ong, Kenneth Keng Wee. 2017. Textese and Singlish in multiparty chats. World Englishes 36(4): 611–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Bal Krishna. 2012. Beyond social networking: Performing global Englishes in Facebook by college youth in Nepal. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(4): 483–509. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shortis, Tim. 2007a. Gr8 txtpectations the creativity of text spelling. EnglishDramaMedia: 21–26.Google Scholar
. 2007b. Revoicing txt: Spelling, vernacular orthography and ‘unregimented writing.’ In Posteguillo Santiago, Esteve, María José & M. Lluïsa Gea-Valor, eds. The texture of internet: Netlinguistics in progress (Vol. 21). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press, 2–23.Google Scholar
Tagg, Caroline. 2011. Wot did he say or could u not c him 4 dust?: Written and spoken creativity in text messaging. In Anderson, C. M. L., Ho, K. T. & Leong, A. P., eds. Transforming literacies and language: multimodality and literacy in the new media age. London: Bloomsbury, 223–236.Google Scholar