Article published In:
English World-WideVol. 35:3 (2014) ► pp.277–305
A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL
A multifactorial approach
This multifactorial corpus-based study focuses on dative alternation constructions (Mark gave his daughter a gift versus Mark gave a gift to his daughter) and contrasts 1,313 give occurrences in ditransitive and prepositional dative constructions across native, learner (EFL) and world (ESL) Englishes. Using cluster analysis and regression modeling, I analyze how grammatical contexts constrain syntactic choices in EFL and ESL and how speakers with different instructional backgrounds develop different variation patterns in their own English variety. The regression model reveals that the English variety factor accounts significantly for syntactic variation. In addition, the study identifies a prototypical prepositional dative construction in non-native English, which serves as a default construction for learners in more complex grammatical contexts. This study stresses the importance of reaching beyond structural linguistic differences by investigating processing (dis)similarities between EFL and ESL and shows the usefulness of a cognitive theoretical framework as a unified approach to cross-varietal variation.
References (44)
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries, and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2014. “The Dative Alternation in South Asian English (es): Modelling Predictors and Predicting Prototypes”. English World-Wide 351: 7–31. <[URL]> (accessed October 21, 2013) 
Biewer, Carolin. 2011. “Modal Auxiliaries in Second Language Varieties: A Learner’s Perspective”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33.
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen. 2007. “Predicting the Dative Alternation”. In Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer, and Joost Zwarts, eds. Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, 69–94.
Bresnan, Joan, and Jennifer Hay. 2008. “Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zeland and American English”. Lingua 1181: 245–259.
Collins, Peter. 1995. “The Indirect Object Construction in English: An Informational Approach”. Linguistics 331: 35–49.
Cutler, Richard. 2010. Tree-based Methods for Classification and Regression. NESCent Workshop on Tree-based methods for Classification and regression. <[URL]> (accessed June 13, 2013)
Deshors, Sandra C., and Stefan Th. Gries. 2014 “A Case for the Multifactorial Assessment of Learner Language: The Uses of ‘May’ and ‘Can’ in French-English Interlanguage”. In Dylan Glynn and Justyna Robinson, eds. Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179–204.
Divjak, Dagmar S., and Stefan Th. Gries. 2006. “Ways of Trying in Russian: Clustering Behavioral Profiles”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21: 23–60.
. 2009. “Corpus-Based Cognitive Semantics: A Contrastive Study of Phasal Verbs in English and Russian”. In Katarzyna Dziwirek and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, eds. Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 273–296.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2011. “Corpus Linguistics to Bridge the Gap between World Englishes and Learner Englishes”. In L. Ruiz Miyares and M.R. Álvarez Silva, eds. Comunicación social en el siglo XXI, Vol. II1. Santiago de Cuba: Centro de Lingüística Aplicada, 638–642.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Sylviane Granger. 2011. “From EFL to ESL: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English”
. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring second-language varieties of English and learner Englishes: Bridging the paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 55–78.
Götz, Sandra and Marco Schilk. 2011. “Formulaic Sequences in Spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and Learner English”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–100.
Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneaux, Fanny Meunier, and Magali Paquot. 2009. International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.
Green, Georgia M. 1974. Semantic and Syntactic Irregularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Greenbaum, Sidney, ed. 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gries, Stefan Th. 2003a. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum.
. 2003b. “Towards a Corpus-Based Identification of Prototypical Instances of Constructions”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11: 1–27.
. 2009. BehavioralProfiles 1.01. A program for R 2.7.1 and higher.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Allison S. Adelman. 2014. “Subject Realization in Japanese Conversation by Native and Non-Native Speakers: Exemplifying a New Paradigm for Learner Corpus Research”. Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Methodological Paradigms. Cham: Springer, 35–54.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Sandra C. Deshors. 2014. “Using Regressions to Explore Deviations between Corpus Data and a Standard/Target: Two Suggestions”. Corpora 91: 109–136.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Anatol Stefanowitsch. 2004. “Extending Collostructional Analysis: A Corpus-Based Perspective on ‘Alternations’”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 91: 97–129.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Stefanie Wulff. 2013. Differences in Prenominal Adjective Order by Native Speakers and Learners: A Two-Step Regression-Analytic Procedure. Paper presented at the 2013 conference of the American Association for Corpus Linguistics, California State University, San Diego, January 18, 2013.
. 2013. “The Genitive Alternation in Chinese and German ESL Learners: Towards a Multifactorial Notion of Context in Learner Corpus Research”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Groves, Julie. 2010. “Error or Feature? The Issue of Interlanguage Deviations in Non-Native Varieties of English”. Hong Kong Baptist University Papers in Applied Language Studies 141: 108–129.
Hundt, Marianne, and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2011a. “Discussion Forum: New Englishes and Learner Englishes – Quo Vadis?”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 209–217.
. 2011b. “Introduction: Bridging a Paradigm Gap”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–7.
Kachru, Braj B., ed. 1982. The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
. 1991. “Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern”. English Today 251: 3–13.
Laporte, Samantha. 2012. “Mind the Gap! Bridge between World Englishes and Learner Englishes in the Making”. English Text Construction 51: 265–292.
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Sebastian Hoffman. 2006. “Describing Verb-Complementational Profiles of New Englishes: A Pilot Study of Indian English”. English World-Wide 271: 147–173.
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Marianne Hundt. 2011. Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nam, Christopher, Sach Mukherjee, Marco Schilk, and Joybrato Mukherjee. 2013. “Statistical analysis of varieties of English”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1761: 777–793.
Nesselhauf, Nadja. 2009. “Co-Selection Phenomena across New Englishes: Parallels (and Differences) to Foreign Learner Varieties”. English World-Wide 301: 1–26.
R Development Core Team. 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. <[URL]> (accessed January 1, 2010)
Ransom, Elizabeth. 1979. “Definiteness and Animacy Constraints on Passives and Double Object Constructions in English”. Glossa 131: 215–240.
Rohdenburg, Günter. 1996. “Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English”. Cognitive Linguistics 71: 149–182.
Schilk, Marco, Joybrato Mukherjee, Christopher Nam, and Sach Mukherjee. 2013. “Complementation of Ditransitive Verbs in South Asian Englishes: A Multifactorial Analysis”. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 01: 1–39.
Schneider, Edgar W. 2003. “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”. Language 791: 233–281.
Sridhar, Kamal K., and S.N. Sridhar 1986. “Bridging the Paradigm Gap: Second language Acquistion Theory and Indigenized Varieties of English”. World Englishes 51: 3–14.
Suzuki, Ryota, and Hidetoshi Shimodaira. 2011. Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling. <[URL]> (accessed October 4, 2013).
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, and Bernd Kortmann. 2009. “The Morphosyntax of Varieties of English Worldwide: A Quantitative Perspective”. Lingua 1191: 1643–1663.
. 2011. “Typological Profiling: Learner Englishes versus L2 Varieties of English”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap . Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–207.
Van Rooy, B. 2011. “A Principled Distinction between Error and Conventionalized Innovation in African Englishes”. In Joybrato Mukherjee and Marianne Hundt, eds. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap.Amsterdam:John Benjamins, 189–207.
Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Gerretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor, and Tom Wasow. 2004. “Animacy encoding in English: why and how”.
Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation
. Barcelona: 118–125.
Cited by (27)
Cited by 27 other publications
Bernaisch, Tobias & Nina Funke
2024. Particle Placement in Hong Kong English: Independence from Great Britain as a Trigger of Structural Change?. Journal of English Linguistics 52:2 ► pp. 137 ff. 
Gan, Qiao
2024. Different registers, different grammars in second language production? The dative alternation in spoken and written Chinese learner English. Lingua 309 ► pp. 103790 ff.
Partridge, Maristi
2024. Chapter 4. Investigating the complementiser that in the verb complementation of Black South African English. In Constraints on Language Variation and Change in Complex Multilingual Contact Settings [Contact Language Library, 60], ► pp. 87 ff.
Dubois, Tanguy, Magali Paquot & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2023. Alternation phenomena and language proficiency: the genitive alternation in the spoken language of EFL learners. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:3 ► pp. 427 ff.
Flowerdew, John
2022. Models of English for research publication purposes. World Englishes 41:4 ► pp. 571 ff.
Gries, Stefan Th., Santa Barbara, Justus Liebig & Sandra C. Deshors
2020. There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies. ICAME Journal 44:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 281 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2018. American and/or British influence on L2 Englishes – Does context tip the scale(s)?. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 187 ff.
Kruger, Haidee & Bertus van Rooy
2018. Register variation in written contact varieties of English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 39:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
KRUGER, HAIDEE & BERTUS VAN ROOY
2017. Editorial practice and the progressive in Black South African English. World Englishes 36:1 ► pp. 20 ff.
Rautionaho, Paula, Sandra C. Deshors & Lea Meriläinen
2018. Revisiting the ENL-ESL-EFL continuum: A multifactorial approach to grammatical aspect in spoken Englishes. ICAME Journal 42:1 ► pp. 41 ff.
Hall, Christopher J., Jack Joyce & Chris Robson
2017. Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests
. Applied Linguistics Review 8:1 ► pp. 35 ff.
MERILÄINEN, LEA
2017. The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes 36:4 ► pp. 760 ff.
Meriläinen, Lea
2018. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:2 ► pp. 164 ff.
Meriläinen, Lea
2020. The progressive form and its functions in spoken learner English. In Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition and Learner Corpus Research [Benjamins Current Topics, 108], ► pp. 24 ff.
Brunner, Marie-Louise, Stefan Diemer & Selina Schmidt
2016. “It’s always different when you look something from the inside”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 323 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2016. Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 21:2 ► pp. 192 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C., Sandra Götz & Samantha Laporte
2016. Linguistic innovations in EFL and ESL. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Edwards, Alison & Rutger-Jan Lange
Horch, Stephanie
2016. Innovative conversions in South-East Asian Englishes. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 278 ff.
Koch, Christopher, Claudia Lange & Sven Leuckert
2016. “This hair-style called as ‘duck tail’”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 151 ff.
ONYSKO, ALEXANDER
2016. Modeling world Englishes from the perspective of language contact. World Englishes 35:2 ► pp. 196 ff.
Rosen, Anna
2016. The fate of linguistic innovations. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 302 ff.
Yao, Xinyue
2016. Cleft constructions in Hong Kong English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 37:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C.
2015. A multifactorial approach to gerundial and to-infinitival verb-complementation patterns in native and non-native English. English Text Construction 8:2 ► pp. 207 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C.
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 1 ff.
Gries, Stefan Th. & Sandra C. Deshors
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.