A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL
A multifactorial approach
This multifactorial corpus-based study focuses on dative alternation constructions (Mark gave his daughter a gift versus Mark gave a gift to his daughter) and contrasts 1,313 give occurrences in ditransitive and prepositional dative constructions across native, learner (EFL) and world (ESL) Englishes. Using cluster analysis and regression modeling, I analyze how grammatical contexts constrain syntactic choices in EFL and ESL and how speakers with different instructional backgrounds develop different variation patterns in their own English variety. The regression model reveals that the English variety factor accounts significantly for syntactic variation. In addition, the study identifies a prototypical prepositional dative construction in non-native English, which serves as a default construction for learners in more complex grammatical contexts. This study stresses the importance of reaching beyond structural linguistic differences by investigating processing (dis)similarities between EFL and ESL and shows the usefulness of a cognitive theoretical framework as a unified approach to cross-varietal variation.
References
Bernaisch, Tobias, Stefan Th. Gries, and Joybrato Mukherjee
Bresnan, Joan, Anna Cueni, Tatiana Nikitina, and R. Harald Baayen
2007 “Predicting the Dative Alternation”. In
Gerlof Bouma,
Irene Krämer, and
Joost Zwarts, eds.
Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science, 69–94.

Bresnan, Joan, and Jennifer Hay
2008 “Gradient Grammar: An Effect of Animacy on the Syntax of Give in New Zeland and American English”.
Lingua 1181: 245–259.


Collins, Peter
1995 “The Indirect Object Construction in English: An Informational Approach”.
Linguistics 331: 35–49.


Cutler, Richard
2010 Tree-based Methods for Classification and Regression. NESCent Workshop on Tree-based methods for Classification and regression.
[URL] (accessed June 13, 2013)
Deshors, Sandra C., and Stefan Th. Gries
2014
“A Case for the Multifactorial Assessment of Learner Language: The Uses of ‘May’ and ‘Can’ in French-English Interlanguage”. In
Dylan Glynn and
Justyna Robinson eds.
Corpus Methods for Semantics: Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy Amsterdam John Benjamins 179 204
Divjak, Dagmar S., and Stefan Th. Gries
2006 “Ways of Trying in Russian: Clustering Behavioral Profiles”.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 21: 23–60.


Divjak, Dagmar S., and Stefan Th. Gries
2009 “Corpus-Based Cognitive Semantics: A Contrastive Study of Phasal Verbs in English and Russian”. In
Katarzyna Dziwirek and
Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, eds.
Studies in Cognitive Corpus Linguistics. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 273–296.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2011 “Corpus Linguistics to Bridge the Gap between World Englishes and Learner Englishes”. In
L. Ruiz Miyares and
M.R. Álvarez Silva, eds.
Comunicación social en el siglo XXI, Vol. II1. Santiago de Cuba: Centro de Lingüística Aplicada, 638–642.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, and Sylviane Granger
Götz, Sandra and Marco Schilk
Granger, Sylviane, Estelle Dagneaux, Fanny Meunier, and Magali Paquot
2009 International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Version 2. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.

Green, Georgia M
1974 Semantic and Syntactic Irregularity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Greenbaum, Sidney
ed. 1996 Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gries, Stefan Th
2003a Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum.

Gries, Stefan Th
2009 BehavioralProfiles 1.01. A program for R 2.7.1 and higher.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Allison S. Adelman
2014.
“Subject Realization in Japanese Conversation by Native and Non-Native Speakers: Exemplifying a New Paradigm for Learner Corpus Research”.
Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Methodological Paradigms. Cham: Springer, 35–54.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Sandra C. Deshors
2014. “
Using Regressions to Explore Deviations between Corpus Data and a Standard/Target: Two Suggestions”.
Corpora 91: 109–136.

Gries, Stefan Th, and Anatol Stefanowitsch
Gries, Stefan Th, and Stefanie Wulff
2013 Differences in Prenominal Adjective Order by Native Speakers and Learners: A Two-Step Regression-Analytic Procedure. Paper presented at the 2013 conference of the American Association for Corpus Linguistics, California State University, San Diego, January 18, 2013.
Gries, Stefan Th, and Stefanie Wulff
2013. “
The Genitive Alternation in Chinese and German ESL Learners: Towards a Multifactorial Notion of Context in Learner Corpus Research”.
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.
Groves, Julie
2010 “Error or Feature? The Issue of Interlanguage Deviations in Non-Native Varieties of English”.
Hong Kong Baptist University Papers in Applied Language Studies 141: 108–129.

Hundt, Marianne, and Joybrato Mukherjee
Hundt, Marianne, and Joybrato Mukherjee
2011b “Introduction: Bridging a Paradigm Gap”. In
Joybrato Mukherjee and
Marianne Hundt, eds.
Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–7.


Kachru, Braj B
ed 1982 The Other Tongue: English across Cultures. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Kachru, Braj B
1991 “Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern”.
English Today 251: 3–13.


Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Sebastian Hoffman
Mukherjee, Joybrato, and Marianne Hundt
Nam, Christopher, Sach Mukherjee, Marco Schilk, and Joybrato Mukherjee
2013 “Statistical analysis of varieties of English”.
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1761: 777–793.


R Development Core Team
2010 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria.
[URL] (accessed January 1, 2010)

Ransom, Elizabeth
1979 “Definiteness and Animacy Constraints on Passives and Double Object Constructions in English”.
Glossa 131: 215–240.

Rohdenburg, Günter
1996 “Cognitive Complexity and Increased Grammatical Explicitness in English”.
Cognitive Linguistics 71: 149–182.


Schilk, Marco, Joybrato Mukherjee, Christopher Nam, and Sach Mukherjee
2013 “
Complementation of Ditransitive Verbs in South Asian Englishes: A Multifactorial Analysis”.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 01: 1–39.


Schneider, Edgar W
2003 “The Dynamics of New Englishes: From Identity Construction to Dialect Birth”.
Language 791: 233–281.


Sridhar, Kamal K., and S.N. Sridhar
1986 “Bridging the Paradigm Gap: Second language Acquistion Theory and Indigenized Varieties of English”.
World Englishes 51: 3–14.


Suzuki, Ryota, and Hidetoshi Shimodaira
2011 Hierarchical Clustering with P-Values via Multiscale Bootstrap Resampling.
[URL] (accessed October 4, 2013).

Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, and Bernd Kortmann
2009 “The Morphosyntax of Varieties of English Worldwide: A Quantitative Perspective”.
Lingua 1191: 1643–1663.


Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, and Bernd Kortmann
Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Gerretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor, and Tom Wasow
2004 “
Animacy encoding in English: why and how”.
Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation
. Barcelona: 118–125.
Cited by
Cited by 24 other publications
Brunner, Marie-Louise, Stefan Diemer & Selina Schmidt
Deshors, Sandra C.
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
Deshors, Sandra C., Sandra Götz & Samantha Laporte
Dubois, Tanguy, Magali Paquot & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2022.
Alternation phenomena and language proficiency: the genitive alternation in the spoken language of EFL learners.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 0:0

Edwards, Alison & Rutger-Jan Lange
Flowerdew, John
2022.
Models of English for research publication purposes.
World Englishes 41:4
► pp. 571 ff.

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
Gries, Stefan Th., Santa Barbara, Justus Liebig & Sandra C. Deshors
2020.
There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies.
ICAME Journal 44:1
► pp. 69 ff.

Gries, Stefan Th. & Sandra C. Deshors
2015.
EFL and/vs. ESL?.
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1:1
► pp. 130 ff.

Hall, Christopher J., Jack Joyce & Chris Robson
2017.
Investigating the lexico-grammatical resources of a non-native user of English: The case of can and could in email requests
.
Applied Linguistics Review 8:1
► pp. 35 ff.

Horch, Stephanie
Koch, Christopher, Claudia Lange & Sven Leuckert
Kruger, Haidee & Bertus van Rooy
2017.
Editorial practice and the progressive in Black South African English.
World Englishes 36:1
► pp. 20 ff.

MERILÄINEN, LEA
2017.
The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora.
World Englishes 36:4
► pp. 760 ff.

ONYSKO, ALEXANDER
2016.
Modeling world Englishes from the perspective of language contact.
World Englishes 35:2
► pp. 196 ff.

Rautionaho, Paula, Sandra C. Deshors & Lea Meriläinen
2018.
Revisiting the ENL-ESL-EFL continuum: A multifactorial approach to grammatical aspect in spoken Englishes.
ICAME Journal 42:1
► pp. 41 ff.

Rosen, Anna
Yao, Xinyue
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.