Cover not available
Article published In:
English World-Wide
Vol. 38:2 (2017) ► pp.181–210

A big city perspective on come/came variation

Evidence from London, U.K.

| University of Ottawa
| University of Bern
| University of Ottawa
This study examines the alternation between non-standard preterite come and its standard counterpart came in London English. A major component of the investigation centers on the comparison of come/came variation in the speech of Anglo (British-heritage) and non-Anglo (migrant-heritage) youth. Rates of preterite come vary markedly across different age cohorts and minority ethnic groups, foregrounding the importance of social factors as key determinants of variant use. By contrast, the internal conditioning of variant selection is not robust, as inferred from the paucity of significant linguistic effects. Similarities in variable patterning in elderly and adolescent Anglo speaker groups nevertheless suggest that shared structural affinities may be due to historical transmission. Conversely, comparison of Anglo and non-Anglo adolescents’ use of come/came variation reveals fewer correspondences in the grammar underlying variable use. The results demonstrate that data from non-Anglo groups contribute to a fuller understanding of come/came variation in an ethnically diverse metropolis.
Keywords: come/came , variation, London English, adolescents, migrant-heritage speakers
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The history of come/came variation
  • 3. Come/came variation in modern English vernaculars
  • 4.Data and method
    • 4.1Data
    • 4.2Applying the comparative variationist framework to come/came variation
    • 4.3Coding and analysis
      • 4.3.1Grammatical person and number
      • 4.3.2Verb + preposition/particle sequences
      • 4.3.3Subject-verb adjacency
      • 4.3.4Sentential aspect
      • 4.3.5Temporal disambiguation
      • 4.3.6Statistical evaluation
  • 5.Results
    • 5.1Distributional analysis
    • 5.2Multivariate analysis
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Sources
  • References
Published online: 28 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.38.2.03lev
References (54)
Sources
A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760 (CED). 2006. Compiled under the supervision of Merja Kytö (Uppsala University) and Jonathan Culpeper (Lancaster University); <[URL]> (accessed February 20, 2017).
Kerswill, Paul, Jenny Cheshire, Sue Fox, and Eivind Torgersen. 2004–2007. Linguistic Innovators: The English of Adolescents in London. Economic and Social Research Council Project RES-00023-0680Google Scholar
References
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2009. The Morphology of English Dialects: Verb-Formation in Non-Standard English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Britain, David. 2007. “Grammatical Variation in England”. In David Britain, ed. Language in the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 75–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “One Foot in the Grave?: Dialect Death, Dialect Contact and Dialect Birth in England”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 196/1971: 121–155.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambers, Jack. 2009. Sociolinguistic Theory. Revised ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny. 1982. Variation in an English Dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, and Susan Fox. 2009. “ Was/Were Variation: A Perspective from London”. Language Variation and Change 211: 1–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, Susan Fox, and Eivind Torgersen. 2011. “Contact, the Feature Pool and the Speech Community: The Emergence of Multicultural London English”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 151: 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Paul Kerswill, and Ann Williams. 2005. “Phonology, Grammar, and Discourse in Dialect Convergence”. In Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens, and Paul Kerswill, eds. Dialect Change: Convergence and Divergence in European Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Christian, Donna, Walt Wolfram, and Nanjo Dube. 1988. Variation and Change in Geographically Isolated Communities: Appalachian English and Ozark English. Tuscaloosa: American Dialect Society.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. “Age as a Sociolinguistic Variable”. In Florian Coulmas, ed. The Handbook of Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 151–167.Google Scholar
Eisikovits, Edina. 1991. “Variation in the Lexical Verb in Inner Sydney English”. In Peter Trudgill, and Jack Chambers, eds. Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation. London: Longman, 120–142.Google Scholar
Erker, Daniel, and Gregory Guy. 2012. “The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Variability: Variable Subject Personal Pronoun Expression in Spanish”. Language 881: 526–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feagin, Crawford. 1979. Variation and Change in Alabama English: A Sociolinguistic Study of the White Community. Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fox, Susan. 2015. The New Cockney: New Ethnicities and Adolescent Speech in the Traditional East End of London. London: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson, and Henry Kučera. 1982. A Frequency Analysis of English. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1961. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Vol. VI: Morphology. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul. 1996. “Children, Adolescents, and Language Change”. Language Variation and Change 81: 177–202 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, Jenny Cheshire, Susan Fox, and Eivind Torgersen. 2013. “English as a Contact Language: The Role of Children and Adolescents”. In Daniel Schreier, and Marianne Hundt, eds. English as a Contact Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 258–282.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd. 2008. “Synopsis: Morphological and Syntactic Variation in the British Isles”. In Bernd Kortmann, and Clive Upton, eds. Varieties of English. Vol. 1: The British Isles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 478–495.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
. 2001a. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. 2: Social Factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2001b. “The Anatomy of Style Shifting”. In Penelope Eckert, and John R. Rickford, eds. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 85–108.Google Scholar
Long, Mary McDonald. 1944. The English Strong Verb from Chaucer to Caxton. Menasha: George Banta.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Angus, Michael Samuels, and Michael Benskin. 1986. A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Meissner, Fran, and Steven Vertovec. 2015. “Comparing Super-Diversity”. Ethnic and Racial Studies 381: 541–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy. 2012. Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English, 3rd ed. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitton, Lavinia, and Peter Aspinall. 2009. “Black Africans in England: A Diversity of Integration Experiences”. In John Stillwell, and Maarten van Ham, eds. Ethnicity and Integration: Understanding Population Trends and Processes. Vol. 31. London: Springer, 179–202.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 2003. Talking Proper: The Rise of Accent as a Social Symbol. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu, and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg. 2003. Historical Linguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Núñez Pertejo, Paloma. 2004. “Some Developments in the Semantics of the English Progressive from Old English to Early Modern English”. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 171: 6–39.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter. 2007. “Jamaican Patwa (Creole English)”. In John Holm, and Peter Patrick, eds. Comparative Creole Syntax. London: Battlebridge, 127–152.Google Scholar
Pegge, Samuel. 1814. Anecdotes of the English Language: Chiefly Regarding the Local Dialect of London and its Environs. London: J.B. Nichols and Son.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, and Sali Tagliamonte. 2001. African American English in the Diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana, Gerard Van Herk, and Dawn Harvie. 2002. “Deformed in the Dialects: An Alternative History of Non-Standard English”. In Richard Watts, and Peter Trudgill, eds. Alternative Histories of English. London: Routledge, 87–110.Google Scholar
Sankoff, David, Sali Tagliamonte, and Eric Smith. 2012. Golvarb Lion: A Multivariate Application for Macintosh. Department of Linguistics, Toronto, and Department of Mathematics, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik, Miriam Meyerhoff, and Lynn Clark. 2011. “Teenagers’ Acquisition of Variation: A Comparison of Locally Born and Migrant Teens’ Realisation of English (ing) in Edinburgh and London”. English World-Wide 321: 206–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schreier, Daniel. 2003. Isolation and Language Change: Contemporary and Sociohistorical Evidence from Tristan da Cunha English. Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer. 2000. “Synchrony and Diachrony in the Evolution of English: Evidence from the Far Reaches of Scotland”. Ph.D. dissertation, University of York.Google Scholar
. 2002. “Accounting for Vernacular Features in a Scottish Dialect: Relic, Innovation, Analogy and Drift”. In Christian Kay, Simon Horobin, and Jeremy Smith, eds. New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics. Vol.1: Syntax and Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 177–193.Google Scholar
Smith, Jeremy. 2012. “Middle English”. In Alexander Bergs, and Laurel Brinton, eds. English Historical Linguistics. An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 32–47.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. Grammatical Variation in British English Dialects: A Study in Corpus-Based Dialectometry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali. 2001. “ Come/Came Variation in English Dialects”. American Speech 761: 42–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Alexandra D’Arcy. 2009. “Peaks beyond Phonology: Adolescence, Incrementation and Language Change”. Language 851: 58–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali, and Shana Poplack. 1993. “The Zero-Marked Verb: Testing the Creole Hypothesis”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 81: 171–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Herk, Gerard, and Shana Poplack. 2003. “Rewriting the Past: Bare Verbs in the Ottawa Repository of Early African American Correspondence”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 181: 231–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov, and Marvin Herzog. 1968. “Empirical Foundations for a Theory of Language Change”. In Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, eds. Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–195.Google Scholar
Wełna, Jerzy. 2012. “Middle English Morphology”. In Alexander Bergs, and Laurel Brinton, eds. English Historical Linguistics. An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 415–434.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, and Natalie Schilling-Estes. 1998. American English: Dialects and Variation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Serbicki, Sofia, Ruijin Lan & Daniel Duncan
2024. Participle-for-preterite variation in Tyneside English. English World-Wide. A Journal of Varieties of English 45:1 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Levey, Stephen
2023. Book Review: Earlier North American Englishes. Varieties of English Around the World. Journal of English Linguistics 51:2 ► pp. 199 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.