Cover not available
Part of
Major versus Minor? – Languages and Literatures in a Globalized World
Edited by Theo D’haen, Iannis Goerlandt and Roger D. Sell
[FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures 1] 2015
► pp. 125–140

Decolonizing World Literature

Published online: 1 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fillm.1.08you
References (40)
Ashcroft, Bill, Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin (eds). 1995. The Post-Colonial Studies Reader. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Auerbach, Erich. 1946. Mimesis: Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendländischen Literatur. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
’Awad, Lewis. 1961. “Almasrah almisri: Ma’sat al-Insan bayna al-Fan wa’l-Din” (“The Tragedy of Man between Art and Religion in the (ancient) Egyptian Theatre”). In Dirasat fi adabina al-Hadith (Studies in modern Arabic Literature), 11–71. Cairo: Dar al-Maarifa.
Curtius, Ernst Robert. 1948. Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Drioton, Étienne. 1942. Le théâtre egyptien. Paris: Editions de la Revue du Caire.Google Scholar
El-Gindi, Yusri. 1971. Baghl el-Baladiyya (The Mule of the County Council). Manuscript. In private ownership.Google Scholar
Escarpit, Roger. 1958. Sociologie de la littérature. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Espmark, Kjell. 1986. Det litterära Nobelpriset: Principer och värderingar bakom besluten. Stockholm: Norstedt.Google Scholar
. 1991. The Nobel Prize in Literature: A Study of the Criteria behind the Choices. Boston: G.K. Hall.Google Scholar
Étiemble, René. 1974. Essais de littérature (vraiment) générale. Paris: Gallimard.
. 1979. Innovation? Feu l’eurocentrisme; ou feu sur l’eurocentrisme? Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fairman, H.W (ed.). 1974. The Triumph of Horus: An Ancient Egyptian Sacred Drama. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gnisci, Armando. 2001. Una Storia Diversa. Rome: Meltemi Editore.Google Scholar
. 2003. “Letteratura globale e letteratura dei mondi.” In La letteratura europea vista dagli altri, ed. by Franca Sinopoli, 107–123. Rome: Meltemi Editore.Google Scholar
Gran, Peter. 1979. Islamic Roots of Capitalism: Egypt: 1760–1840. Austin, TX and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hilferding, Rudolf. 1910. Das Finanzkapital: Eine Studie über die jüngste Entwicklung des Kapitalismus. Vienna: Wiener Volksbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Jost, François. 1974. Introduction to Comparative Literature. Indianapolis and New York: Pegasus/Bobbs-Merril.Google Scholar
Metscher, Thomas. 2001. Moderne Weltliteratur und die Stimme Schwarzafrikas. Essen: Neue Impulse Verlag.Google Scholar
Retamar, Roberto Fernandez. 1975. “Para una theoría de la literatura hispanoamericana.” In Para una teoría de la literatura hispanoamericana e otras aproximaciones, 41–52. Havana: Casa de las Américas.Google Scholar
Riesz, Janos. 1983. “‘Weltliteratur’ zwischen ‘Erster’ und ‘Dritter’ Welt: Die Verantwortung der vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft (Komparatistik) heute.” Zeitschrift für Kulturaustausch 33: 140–148.Google Scholar
Rüdiger, Horst. 1981. “Europäische Literatur–Weltliteratur: Goethes Konzeption und die Forderungen unserer Epoche.” In Komparatistik: Theoretische Überlegungen und südosteuropäische Wechselseitigkeit, ed. by Fridrun Rinner and Klaus Zerinschek, 27–42. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Ruprecht, Hans-George. 1971. “Weltliteratur vue du Mexique en 1826.” Bulletin hispanique 73: 307–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
. 1988. “Yeats and Decolonization.” In Nationalism, Colonialism And Literature, ed. by Terry Eagleton, Fredric Jameson, and Edward Said, 69–98. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Culture and Imperialism. New York: A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Schmeling, Manfred. 1995. Weltliteratur heute: Konzepte und Perspektiven. Würzburg: Königs hausen and Neumann.Google Scholar
Sethe, Kurt Heinrich (ed.). 1928. Dramatische Texte zu altägyptischen Mysterienspielen. Leipzig: Hinrichs.Google Scholar
Sinopoli, Franca (ed.). 1999. Il mito della letteratura europea. Rome: Meltemi Editore.Google Scholar
(ed.). 2003. La letteratura europea vista dagli altri. Rome: Meltemi Editore.Google Scholar
Youssef, Magdi. 1976. Brecht in Ägypten: Versuch einer literatursoziologischen Deutung. Bochum: Brockmeyer Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Literary and Social Transformations: The Case of Modern European and Arabic Literatures.” In Proceedings of the Xth Congress of the International Comparative Literature Association, ed. by Anna Balakian, James J. Wilhelm, and Douwe W. Fokkema, et al., 51–57. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
. 1993. al-Tadakhul al-Hadari wa‘l Istiqlal al-Fikri [Socio-Cultural Interference and Intellectual Independence]. Cairo. [In Arabic.]Google Scholar
. 1994. “Brecht’s Theatre and Social Change in Egypt (1954–71).” Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts 63: 59–73. Cairo: Cairo University Press.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Towards a Multi-Centric Literary Canon: The Arab Contribution in Language and Literature Today.” In Proceedings of the 19th Triennial Congress of the International Federation for Modern Languages and Literatures , 496–498. [Abstract.]
. 1998a. The Myth of European Literature. Aachen and Rotterdam: Symposium.Google Scholar
. 1998b. “Towards a Real Decentralization of the Literary Canon: The Arab Contribution.” In Humanism and the Good Life: Proceedings of the Fifteenth Congress of the World Federation of Humanists , ed. by Peter Horwath, William L. Hendrickson, L. Teresa Valdivieso, and Eric P. Thor, 381–389. New York: Peter Lang.
. 2000. “The Problem of the Model in Contemporary Theatre.”Art in Society 0. [URL].Google Scholar
. 2001. Min al-Tadakhul ila at-Tafa’ul al-Hadari [From Socio-Cultural Interference to Cross-Cultural Interaction]. Cairo: Kitab al-Hilal’s popular book Series. [In Arabic.]Google Scholar
. 2003. “Il mito della letteratura europea.” In letteratura europea vista dagli altri, ed. by Franca Sinopoli, 65–105. Rome: Meltemi Editore.Google Scholar
. 2009. “From a Philological to a Social Scientific Approach with Regard to Comparative Literary Research.” In Beyond Binarisms: Crossings and Contaminations, ed. by Eduardo F. Coutinho and Pina Coco, 14–19. Rio de Janeiro: Aeroplano.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Fang, Weigui
2022. World Literature in China: Aspiration, Anxiety and Some Theoretical Questions. In Universal Localities [Schriften zur Weltliteratur/Studies on World Literature, 13], ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Beyond Babel [FILLM Studies in Languages and Literatures, 18], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.