Review published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 25:3 (2018) ► pp.413–422
Book review
De Knop, Sabine & Gaëtanelle Gilquin (eds.) Applied Construction Grammar
Reviewed by
References
Chang, Franklin, Gary S. Dell, Kathryn Bock & Zenzi M. Griffin
2000 Structural priming as implicit learning: A comparison of models of sentence production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29(2). 217–229. 
Collins, Laura & Nick C. Ellis
(eds.) 2009 Input and second language construction learning: Frequency, form, and function. Modern Language Journal 93(3).
Ellis, Nick C. & Teresa Cadierno
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline & Elena Tribushinina
(eds.) 2017 Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and language teaching. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Goldberg, Adele E.
2009 The nature of generalization in language. Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 93–127.
2013 Constructionist approaches. In Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford handbook of construction grammar, 15–31. Oxford: OUP.
Hare, Mary & Adele E. Goldberg
1999 Structural priming: Purely syntactic? In Martin Hahn & Scott Stones (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 208-211. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ortega, Lourdes, Andrea Tyler, Mariko Uno & Hae In Park
Savage, Ceri, Elena V. M. Lieven, Anna L. Theakston & Michael Tomasello
2006 Structural priming as implicit learning: The persistence of lexical and structural priming in 4-year-olds. Language Learning and Development 21. 27–49.
Slobin, Dan I.
2004 The many ways to search for a frog. Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating Events in Narrative Volume 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.