Review published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 26:3 (2019) ► pp. 372380


Athanasiadou, Angeliki & Herbert L. Colston
(eds.) 2017Irony in language use and communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Lawrence N.
2007Cooperative conflict and evasive language: The case of the 9/11 commission hearings.” In Anita Fetzer (ed.), Context and appropriateness: Micro meets macro, 176–215. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Fighting words: Hybrid discourse and discourse processes. In Anita Fetzer & Etsuko Oishi (eds.), Context and contexts, 41–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brendel, Elke, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach
(eds.) 2011Understanding quotation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2018Irony, deception and humour: Seeking the truth about overt and covert untruthfulness. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gu, Yueguo
2010The activity type as interface between language and parole, and between individual and society: An argument for trichotomy in pragmatics. Pragmatics and Society 1(1). 74–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 380 ]
Harré, Rom & Luk Van Langenhove
1999Positioning theory: Moral contexts of intentional action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Katriel, Tamar
1986Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra culture. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nuolijärvi, Pirkko & Liisa Tiittulab
2011Irony in political television debates. Journal of Pragmatics 43(2). 572–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor & Maria Belén Alvarado Ortega
(eds.) 2013Irony and humor: From pragmatics to discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saka, Paul & Michael Johnson
(eds.) 2017The semantics and pragmatics of quotation. Cham: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1992Conversation revisited. In John R. Searle, Hermann Parret & Jef Verschueren (eds.), (On) Searle on conversation, 137–147. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yus, Francisco
2016Propositional attitude, affective attitude and irony comprehension. Pragmatics & Cognition 23(1). 92–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar