Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse-pragmatic perspectives on interrogatives
Edited by Malte Rosemeyer
[Functions of Language 29:1] 2022
► pp. 25–57

A contrastive perspective on French and Italian wh-in situ questions

A discourse-pragmatic approach

| University of Zurich | ZHAW
This paper offers a qualitative and quantitative analysis of French and Italian wh-in situ questions based on spontaneous spoken data. A pragmatic analysis relying on two parameters, propositional activation and pragmatic functions, reveals that the licensing conditions and the use of this structure largely differ in the two languages. While French wh-in situ do not require an activated proposition and can introduce a discourse-new topic, Italian wh-in situ mostly require an activated proposition and, at least in the analyzed corpus data, do not introduce discourse-new topics. An examination of the context also reveals that the different licensing conditions influence the interactional uses of these questions. All in all, both French and Italian wh-in situ require a pragmatic condition, which is their ‘anchoring’ to given, or at least inferable, information in the linguistic context (as is typical of Italian) or to predictable situations in the extralinguistic context (such as expected discourse moves in social interactions, as is the case for French).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.French and Italian in situ
  • 3.Research questions and discourse parameters
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Activation of the proposition
    • 3.3Pragmatic functions of in situ questions
  • 4.Corpus analysis
    • 4.1The corpus
    • 4.2Quantitative analysis
      • 4.2.1The frequency of in situ questions in French and Italian
      • 4.2.2The activation of p
      • 4.2.3The pragmatic functions of in situ questions
    • 4.3A brief look at ex situ questions in French and Italian
      • 4.3.1The activation of p in ex situ questions
      • 4.3.2The pragmatic functions of ex situ questions
  • 5.Information-seeking in situ and discourse structure
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 15 February 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.00037.gar
References (50)
References
Adli, Aria. 2006. French wh-in-situ questions and syntactic optionality: Evidence from three data types. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 251. 163–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badan, Linda & Claudia Crocco. 2019. Focus in Italian echo wh-questions: An analysis at syntax-prosody interface. Probus 31(1). 29–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. Italian wh- questions and the low periphery. Linguistics 59(3). 757–784. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badan, Linda, Stella Gryllia & Gaetano Fiorin. 2017. Italian echo-questions at the interface. Studia Linguistica 71(3). 207–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Béguelin, Marie-José, Aidan Coveney & Alexander Guryev (eds.). 2018. L’interrogative en français. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biezma, Maria. 2018. Givenness and the difference between wh-fronted and wh-in-situ questions in Spanish. In Janine Berns, Heike Jacobs & Dominique Nouveau (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 13. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 29, Nijmegen, 21–39. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1978. Asking more than one thing at a time. In Herny Hiż (ed.), Questions, 107–150. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boucher, Paul. 2010. Wh-questions in French and English. Mapping syntax to information structure. In Carsten Breul & Edward Göbbel (eds.), Comparative and contrastive studies of information structure, 101–137. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2016. (Contrastive) Topics. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), 64–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: UCP.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen & Johan Rooryck. 2000. Licensing wh-in-situ . Syntax 31. 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chernova, Ekaterina. 2015. The Syntax of wh-movement in multiple (true and echo) questions: A Q-particle approach. Girona: Universitat de Girona PhD Thesis.
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard, Martin Haspelmath & Balthasar Bickel. 2015. Leipzig glossing rules. Conventions for interlinear morpheme-by-morpheme glosses. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (Last access: 05.06.2021).
Coveney, Aidan. 1996. Variability in spoken French. A sociolinguistic study of interrogation and negation. Exeter: Elm Bank Publications.Google Scholar
. 2020. L’interrogation directe. In Encyclopédie grammaticale du français. [URL] (Last access: 05.06.2021).
Cresti, Emanuela & Massimo Moneglia. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM. Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Santis, Cristiana. 2010. Aggettivi e pronomi interrogativi. In Raffaele Simone (ed.), Enciclopedia dell’italiano, vol. I (A-L), 684–686. Roma: Istituto dell’Enciclopedia Italiana G. Treccani.Google Scholar
Donzelli, Giulia & Diego Pescarini. 2019. Tre tipi di wh in situ nei dialetti lombardi. In Annamaria Chilà & Alessandro De Angelis (eds.), Bollettino del Centro di studi filologici e linguistici siciliani 211. 183–197.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 1996. Focus, pragmatic presupposition, and activated propositions. Journal of Pragmatics 26(4). 475–523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. Position of interrogative phrases in content questions. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (Last access: 05.06.2021).
Dufter, Andreas & Elisabeth Stark (eds.). 2017. Manual of Romance morphosyntax and syntax. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabeth. 2006. Information packaging in questions. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, 93–111. Paris: CSSP.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.). 2016. The Oxford handbook of information structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara. 2017. Dislocations and framings. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 472–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Georg & Stefano Quaglia. 2015. In search of wh-in-situ in Romance: An investigation in detective stories. In Ellen Brandner, Anna Czypionka, Constantin Freitag & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), Charting the landscape of linguistics, 92–103. Konstanz: Konstanzer Online-Publikations-System. [URL] (Last access: 05.06.2021).
Kellert, Olga. 2017. Interrogatives. In Andreas Dufter & Elisabeth Stark (eds.), 569–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene. 2003. Wh-questions used as challenges. Discourse Studies 5(1). 51–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Renate Musan. 2012. Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds.), The expression of information structure, 1–43. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamlaoui, Fatima. 2011. On the role of phonology and discourse in Francilian French wh-questions. Journal of Linguistics 47(1). 129–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrivée, Pierre. 2016. The pragmatics of marked configurations: Negative doubling in French. Journal of Pragmatics 951. 34–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Historical pragmatics, explicit activation and wh in situ in French. In Ingo Feldhausen, Martin Elsig, Imme Kuchenbrandt & Mareike Neuhaus (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 15. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 30, Frankfurt, 114–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefeuvre, Florence & Nathalie Rossi-Gensane. 2015. Interrogation. In Pierre Larrivée & Florence Lefeuvre (eds.), Projet Fracov. [URL] (Last access: 05.06.2021).
Levshina, Natalia. 2015. How to do linguistics with R. Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathieu, Éric. 2009. Les questions en français: Micro et macro-variation. In France Martineau, Raymond Mougeon, Terry Nadasdi & Mireille Tremblay (eds.), Le français d’ici: études linguistiques et sociolinguistiques de la variation, 37–66. Toronto: GREF.Google Scholar
Myers, Lindsy Lee. 2007. WH-interrogatives in spoken French: A corpus-based analysis of their form and function. Austin: University of Texas Austin PhD Thesis.
Oushiro, Livia. 2011. Wh-interrogatives in Brazilian Portuguese: The influence of common ground. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 17 (2). 145–154.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Heather Taylor. 2009. The syntax of wh-in-situ and common ground. CLS 43 (2). 201–215.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. A language and environment for statistical computing, v 4.1.01. Wien: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [URL] (Last access: 05.06.2021).
Riester, Arndt, Lisa Brunetti & Kordula De Kuthy. 2018. Annotation guidelines for Questions Under Discussion and information structure. In Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds.), Information structure in lesser-described languages. Studies in prosody and syntax, 403–444. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 2012 [1996]. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Semantics & Pragmatics 51. 1–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2018. The pragmatics of Spanish postposed wh-interrogatives. Folia Linguistica, 52(2). 283–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Brazilian Portuguese in-situ wh-interrogatives between rhetoric and change. Glossa 4(1). 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. This issue. Modeling the discourse pragmatics of interrogatives. Functions of Language.
Rossi-Gensane, Nathalie & Biagio Ursi. 2020. Syntaxe et genre interactionnel : le cas des interrogatives directes partielles dans les interactions commerciales. Langages 219(3). 147–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spina, Stefania. 2014. Perugia Corpus: una risorsa di riferimento per l’italiano. Composizione, annotazione e valutazione. In Roberto Basili, Alessandro Lenci & Bernardo Magnini (eds.), Proceedings of the First Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CLiC-it, vol. 11, 354–359. Pisa: Pisa University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, Leah & David Beaver. 2016. Question-based models of information structure. In Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds.), 86–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wallage, Phillip. 2015. Identifying the role of pragmatic activation in changes to the expression of English negation. In Pierre Larrivée & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Negation and polarity: Experimental perspectives, 199–227. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Michael & Katharina Kaiser. 2019. Refining current insights into the wh-in-situ interrogative construction in French: The case of Contemporary Hexagonal French. Romanistisches Jahrbuch 70(1). 123–157. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Guryev, Alexander, Laurie Dekhissi & Caterina Bonan
2024. L’interrogative in situ : aspects formels, pragmatiques et variationnels. Présentation. Journal of French Language Studies ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Guryev, Alexander & François Delafontaine
2023. L’interrogative in situ à la lumière des principes de ‘End-Weight’ et ‘End-Focus’. Journal of French Language Studies 33:3 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Rosemeyer, Malte
2023. French and Spanish wh-interrogatives with and without wh. Journal of French Language Studies 33:2 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.