Review published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 10:2 (2003) ► pp. 253261
References
Bach, K.
(1999) The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 221: 327–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D.
(1987) Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goethals, P.
(2002) Las conjunciones causales explicativas españolas como, ya que, pues y porque: Un estudio semiótico-lingüistico. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P.
(1968/1989) Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. In Grice, H. P. 1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holdcroft, D.
(1992) Searle on conversation and structure. In H. Parret, and J. Verschueren (eds.) (On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 57–76.Google Scholar
Rieber, S.
(1997) Conventional implicatures as tacit performatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 201: 50–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber
(1990) Forme linguistique et pertinence. Cahiers de Linguistique française 261: 13–35.Google Scholar