Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 10:2 (2003) ► pp.253261
References (7)
References
Bach, K. (1999). The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 221: 327–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goethals, P. (2002). Las conjunciones causales explicativas españolas como, ya que, pues y porque: Un estudio semiótico-lingüistico. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1968/1989). Utterer’s meaning, sentence-meaning, and word-meaning. In Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holdcroft, D. (1992) Searle on conversation and structure. In H. Parret, and J. Verschueren (eds.) (On) Searle on Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 57–76.Google Scholar
Rieber, S. (1997). Conventional implicatures as tacit performatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 201: 50–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber. (1990). Forme linguistique et pertinence. Cahiers de Linguistique française 261: 13–35.Google Scholar