Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 12:2 (2005) ► pp.275283
References (23)
References
Baker, M. C. (1997) Thematic roles and syntactic structure. In L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 73–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, J. W. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. (Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics, 161.) Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1975). Questions of form and interpretation. Linguistic Analysis 11: 75–109.Google Scholar
(1981). Lectures on government and binding. (Studies in Generative Grammar, 91.) Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
(2005). Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 361: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, S. C. (1989). The theory of functional grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. (Functional Grammar Series, 91.) Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1997). The theory of functional grammar. 21 vols. Ed. by Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hale, K. and S. J. Keyser. (1993) On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In K. Hale and S. J. Keyser (eds.) The view from Building 20: Essays in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 53–110.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., N. Chomsky and W. T. Fitch. (2002). The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 2981: 1569–1579. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, W. B. (1997). Semiotic grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1992). Iconicity and generative grammar. Language 681: 756–796. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2005). Possible and probable languages: A generative perspective on linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997) The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.) Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 281–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1991). Autolexical syntax: A theory of parallel grammatical components. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sag, I. A., T. Wasow and E. M. Bender. (2003). Syntactic theory: A formal introduction. 2nd ed. (CSLI Lecture Notes, 1521.) Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (ed.) (1998). The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D. (1993) A synopsis of role and reference grammars. In R. D. Van Valin (ed.) Advances in role and reference grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1–164.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D. and R. J. Lapolla. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Chen, Yixiong, Csilla Weninger & Fei Victor Lim
2024. Chapter 4. Multimodality. In Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 6],  pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Yixiong
2022. Salient visual foci on human faces in viewers’ engagement with advertisements: Eye-tracking evidence and theoretical implications. Multimodality & Society 2:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Feng, Zongxin
2022. The interaction and rhetorical conflict between systemic linguistics and generative linguistics. Journal of World Languages 8:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles, Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco Gonzálvez-García & Angela Downing
2014. Introduction. Plotting functional-cognitive space. In Theory and Practice in Functional-Cognitive Space [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 68],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Golumbia, David
2010. Minimalism is functionalism. Language Sciences 32:1  pp. 28 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.