Review published In:
Evaluation in text types
Edited by Monika Bednarek
[Functions of Language 15:1] 2008
► pp. 152170
References (22)
References
Altenberg, Bengt, Karin Aijmer & Mikael Svensson (eds.) (2001). English-Swedish Parallel Corpus. [URL] (15 September, 2007.)
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl. (1965) [1934]. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Carretero, Marta. (2004) Explorations on English will/be going to and Spanish future /ir a . In Roberta Facchinetti & Frank Palmer (eds.) English modality in perspective: Genre analysis and contrastive studies. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang. 205–230.Google Scholar
. (2007). Subjectivity in English epistemic modality: A two-resource based approach. BELL New Series 51: 97–111.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Alan Timberlake. (1985) Tense, aspect and mood. In Timothy Shopen (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description. Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 202–258.Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Hermerén, Lars. (1978). On modality in English: The study of the semantics of the modals. Lund: C.W.K. Gleerup.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Sandra Thomspon. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoye, Leo F.. (1996). Adverbs and modality in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney and Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kärkkäinen, Elise. (2003). Epistemic stance in English conversation: A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on I think . (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 1151.) Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klinge, Alex. (1996). The impact of context on modal meaning in English and Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 191: 35–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. (1977). Semantics. Vol. 21. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R.. (1990) [1979]]. Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Papafragou, Anna. (1998) Modality and semantic indeterminacy. In Villy Rouchota and Andreas H. Jucker (eds.) Current issues in relevance theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 237–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2000). Modality: Issues in the semantics-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Perkins, Michael R.. (1983). Modal expressions in English. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E.. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Auwera, Johan & Vladimir Plungian. (1998). Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 21: 79–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L.. (1941) The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In Leslie Spier (ed.) Language, culture and personality: Essays in memory of Edward Sapir, 75–93. Menasha, WI: Sapir Memorial Publication Fund. Reprinted in John B. Carroll (ed.) (1956). Language, thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 134–159.Google Scholar