Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 25:2 (2018) ► pp. 229258


Artstein, Ron & Massimo Poesio
2008Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34(4). 555–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2008Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to Statistics using R. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartalesi Lenzi, Valentina, Giovanni Moretti & Rachele Sprugnoli
2012CAT: the CELCT Annotation Tool. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC12), Istanbul: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). Available online at: http://​www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2012​/pdf​/216​_Paper​.pdf [Accessed 22 September 2015]
Bednarek, Monika
2006Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008Emotion talk across corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Language patterns and ATTITUDE. Functions of Language 16(2). 165–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014An astonishing season of destiny! Evaluation in blurbs used for advertising TV series. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 197–220.Google Scholar
Ben-Aaron, Diana
2005Given and news: Evaluation in newspaper stories about national anniversaries. Text & Talk 25(5). 691–718. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carretero, Marta & Maite Taboada
2014Graduation within the scope of Attitude in English and Spanish consumer reviews of books and movies. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 221–239.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob
1960A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1). 37–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cozby, Paul & Scott Bates
2011Methods in behavioral research, 11th edn. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dice, Lee R.
1945Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3). 297–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Divjak, Dagmar
2006Ways of intending: Delineating and structuring near synonyms. In Stefan Th. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis, 19–56. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Don, Alexanne
2007An approach to the analysis of textual identity through profiles of evaluative disposition. In Proceedings of the Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics Association 2007 Conference. Available at: http://​www​.asfla​.org​.au​/category​/asfla2007/. [Accessed 22 September 2015]
Fuoli, Matteo
2012Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication 6(1). 55–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo & Dylan Glynn
2013Computer-assisted manual annotation of evaluative language expressions: Bridging discourse and corpus approaches. Paper presented at the Evaluative Language and Corpus Linguistics Workshop , Lancaster University, 22 July 2013.
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg
2015Optimizing transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10(3). 315–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo & Carita Paradis
2014A model of trust-repair discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 741. 52–69. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema
1994The structure of lexical variation. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Dylan
2009Polysemy, syntax, and variation: A usage-based method for Cognitive Semantics. In Vyvyan Evans & Stéphanie Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, 77–104. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th.
1999Particle movement: A cognitive and functional approach. Cognitive Linguistics 10(2). 105–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Statistics for linguistics with R: A practical introduction. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hommerberg, Charlotte & Alexanne Don
2015Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation: A critical discussion of the potential of the Appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres. Functions of Language 22(2). 161–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Susan
2004Appraising research: Taking a stance in academic writing. Sydney: University of Technology PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan
2004Counting the uncountable: Problems of identifying evaluation in a text and in a corpus. In Alan Partington, John Morley & Louann Haarman (eds.), Corpora and Discourse, 157–188. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Kirk, Jerome & Marc L. Miller
1986Reliability and validity in qualitative research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorf, Klaus
2004Content Analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lipovsky, Caroline
2008Constructing affiliation and solidarity in job interviews. Discourse & Communication 2(4). 411–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 It’s really a great presentation!: Appraising candidates in job interviews. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 4(2). 161–185. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Negotiating ones expertise through appraisal in CVs. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 8(3). 307–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, James & Jean Parkinson
2009 My very own mission impossible: An APPRAISAL analysis of student teacher reflections on a design and technology project. Text & Talk 29(6). 729–753. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Macken-Horarik, Mary & Anne Isaac
2014Appraising Appraisal. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 67–92.Google Scholar
Marshall, Christine, Ralph Adendorff & Vivian de Klerk
2010The role of APPRAISAL in the NRF Rating System: An analysis of Judgement and Appreciation in peer reviewers’ reports. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 27(4). 391–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
2000Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose
2003Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna & Marina Bondi
2003Evaluative language use in academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4). 269–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick
2008Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technologies: Demo Session. 13–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Appraisal analysis and the computer. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 651. 115–130.Google Scholar
2014Exploring identity through Appraisal Analysis: A corpus annotation methodology. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 9(1). 95–116.Google Scholar
Page, Ruth E.
2003An analysis of APPRAISAL in childbirth narratives with special consideration of gender and storytelling style. Text & Talk 23(2). 211–237.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
2001Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12(1). 47–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita, Joost van de Weijer, Caroline Willners & Magnus Lindgren
2012Evaluative polarity of antonyms. Lingue e linguaggio 11(2). 199–214.Google Scholar
Pounds, Gabrina
2010Attitude and subjectivity in Italian and British hardnews reporting: The construction of a culture-specific ‘reporter’ voice. Discourse Studies 12(1). 106–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 This property offers much character and charm: Evaluation in the discourse of online property advertising. Text & Talk 31(2). 195–220. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James & Amber Stubbs
2012Natural language annotation for machine learning. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
Read, Jonathon & John Carroll
2012Annotating expressions of Appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 46(3). 421–447. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ryshina-Pankova, Marianna
2014Exploring argumentation in course-related blogs through ENGAGEMENT. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 281–302.Google Scholar
Santamaría-García, Carmen
2014Evaluative discourse and politeness in university students’ communication through social networking sites. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 387–411.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite & Marta Carretero
2012Contrastive analyses of evaluation in text: Key issues in the design of an annotation system for ATTITUDE applicable to consumer reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6(1–3). 275–295.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite, Marta Carretero & Jennifer Hinnell
2014Loving and hating the movies in English, German and Spanish. Languages in Contrast 14(1). 127–161. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2014AFFECT and emotion, target-value mismatches, and Russian dolls: Refining the APPRAISAL model. In Geoff Thompson & Laura Alba-Juez (eds.), 47–66.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Laura Alba-Juez
(eds.) 2014Evaluation in context. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Hunston
2000Evaluation: An introduction. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 1–27. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 16 other publications

Andersson, Marta
2022. ‘So many “virologists” in this thread!’. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) Crossref logo
Bisiada, Mario
2018. A cross-linguistic analysis of the ‘homework’ metaphor in German and English political discourse. Discourse & Society 29:6  pp. 609 ff. Crossref logo
2022. Sunken ships and screaming banshees: metaphor and evaluation in film reviews. English Language and Linguistics 26:1  pp. 75 ff. Crossref logo
Fusari, Sabrina
2019.  In Specialized Discourses and Their Readerships [The M.A.K. Halliday Library Functional Linguistics Series, ],  pp. 25 ff. Crossref logo
Geng, Yifan & Sue Wharton
2019. How do thesis writers evaluate their own and others’ findings? An appraisal analysis and a pedagogical intervention. English for Specific Purposes 56  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
2021. The Language of Evaluation in the Narratives by the Magdalene Laundries Survivors: The Discourse of Female Victimhood. Applied Linguistics 42:2  pp. 315 ff. Crossref logo
Kolhatkar, Varada, Hanhan Wu, Luca Cavasso, Emilie Francis, Kavan Shukla & Maite Taboada
2020. The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments. Corpus Pragmatics 4:2  pp. 155 ff. Crossref logo
Makki, Mohammad & Andrew S. Ross
2021. “We were cocked & loaded to retaliate”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict Crossref logo
Mavis Ho, Nga-Ki
2021. Transcreation in marketing: a corpus-based study of persuasion in optional shifts from English to Chinese. Perspectives 29:3  pp. 426 ff. Crossref logo
Page, Ruth
2019. Self-denigration and the mixed messages of ‘ugly’ selfies in Instagram. Internet Pragmatics 2:2  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Paternoster, Annick
2019.  In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299],  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Ross, Andrew S. & David Caldwell
2020. ‘Going negative’: An APPRAISAL analysis of the rhetoric of Donald Trump on Twitter. Language & Communication 70  pp. 13 ff. Crossref logo
Trnavac, Radoslava & Maite Taboada
2021. Engagement and constructiveness in online news comments in English and Russian. Text & Talk 0:0 Crossref logo
van Driel, Martine
2021.  In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Van Herck, Rebecca, Sofie Decock & Bernard De Clerck
2020. “Can you send us a PM please?” Service recovery interactions on social media from the perspective of organizational legitimacy. Discourse, Context & Media 38  pp. 100445 ff. Crossref logo
Vilar Lluch, Sara
2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.