Review published in:
Evidentiality in language and cognition
Edited by Lena Ekberg and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 16:1] 2009
► pp. 149160
References
Baicchi, Annalisa, Cristiano Broccias & Andrea Sansò
(eds.) 2005Modelling thought and constructing meaning. Cognitive models in interaction. Milan: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
Bertele, Raphael
2004The typology of motion and posture verbs: a variational account. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 93–126. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using language. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz
(eds.) 2003Cognitive models in language and thought. Ideology, metaphors and meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Enfield, Nick & Anna Wierzbicka
2002The body in description of emotion. Pragmatics and Cognition 101: 1–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, Giles & Mark Turner
1996Blending as a central process of grammar. In Adele Goldberg (ed.) Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 113–130. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2003Cultural models of linguistic standardization. In René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (eds.) 2003 Cognitive models in language and thought. Ideology, metaphors and meaning, 25–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema
1994The structure of lexical variation. Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1995Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco & Christopher S. Butler
2006Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 41: 39–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harder Peter
2003The status of linguistic facts. Rethinking the relation between cognition, social institution and utterance from a functional point of view. Mind and Language 181: 52–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holland, Dorothy & Naomi Quinn
(eds.) 1987Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Horn, Lawrence
1984Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning, from, and use in context, 11–42. Washington DC.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
2003What is Language? A study in the philosophy of linguistics. Turku: Abo Akadeemis Tryckeri.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
2000Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte
2003How to do things with allophones: linguistic stereotypes as cognitive reference points in social cognition. In René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought. Ideology, metaphors and meaning, 69–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II. Descriptive Applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1998Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 1–41. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2001Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willelm J. M.
1989Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2000Presumptive Meaning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panther, Klaus Uwe & Linda Thornburg
1998A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 301. 755–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas: the ease of dependent clauses as independent speech acts. In Klaus Uwe Panther & Linda Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, 127–147. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José
1996Understanding through metonymy: The role of metonymy in communication and cognition. In Beatrice Peñas (ed.), The pragmatics of understanding and misunderstanding, 197–208. Zaragoza: University of Zaragoza.Google Scholar
1998On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics 30(3). 259–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Olga Diez
2002Patterns of conceptual integration. In René Dirven & Ralph Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 489–352. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Chris
1999Situated selves. In Joan Bliss, Roger Saljo & Paul Light (eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning, 32–46. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondalaers & Dirk Geeraerts
2003Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities 371. 317–337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deidre Wilson
1995Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Towards cognitive semantics. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
2001The epigenesis of meaning in human beings, and possibly in robots. Mind and Machines 111. 155–195. CrossrefGoogle Scholar