Review published In:
Evidentiality in language and cognitionEdited by Lena Ekberg and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 16:1] 2009
► pp. 149–160
Edited by Lena Ekberg and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 16:1] 2009
► pp. 149–160
Book review
. Cognitive Linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005. viii + 432 pp. ISBN 978-3-11-018617-9
Reviewed by
References (33)
Baicchi, Annalisa, Cristiano Broccias & Andrea Sansò (eds.). 2005. Modelling thought and constructing meaning. Cognitive models in interaction. Milan: Franco Angeli.
Bertele, Raphael. 2004. The typology of motion and posture verbs: a variational account. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective, 93–126. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dirven, René, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (eds.). 2003. Cognitive models in language and thought. Ideology, metaphors and meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Enfield, Nick & Anna Wierzbicka. 2002. The body in description of emotion. Pragmatics and Cognition 101: 1–25.
Fauconnier, Giles & Mark Turner. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar. In Adele Goldberg (ed.) Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 113–130. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Geeraerts, Dirk. 2003. Cultural models of linguistic standardization. In René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (eds.). 2003. Cognitive models in language and thought. Ideology, metaphors and meaning, 25–68. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema. 1994. The structure of lexical variation. Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco & Christopher S. Butler. 2006. Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 41: 39–96.
Harder Peter. 2003. The status of linguistic facts. Rethinking the relation between cognition, social institution and utterance from a functional point of view. Mind and Language 181: 52–76.
Holland, Dorothy & Naomi Quinn (eds.). 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Horn, Lawrence. 1984. Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R-based implicature. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.). Meaning, from, and use in context, 11–42. Washington DC.: Georgetown University Press.
Itkonen, Esa. 2003. What is Language? A study in the philosophy of linguistics. Turku: Abo Akadeemis Tryckeri.
Jackendoff, Ray. 2000. Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kristiansen, Gitte. 2003. How to do things with allophones: linguistic stereotypes as cognitive reference points in social cognition. In René Dirven, Roslyn Frank & Martin Pütz (eds.), Cognitive models in language and thought. Ideology, metaphors and meaning, 69–120. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume I. Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II. Descriptive Applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
. 1998. Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, 1–41. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
. 2001. Discourse in Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12(2). 143–188.
Levelt, Willelm J. M. 1989. Speaking. From intention to articulation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen. 2000. Presumptive Meaning. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Panther, Klaus Uwe & Linda Thornburg. 1998. A cognitive approach to inferencing in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 301. 755–769.
. 2003. Metonymies as natural inference and activation schemas: the ease of dependent clauses as independent speech acts. In Klaus Uwe Panther & Linda Thornburg (eds.), Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing, 127–147. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José. 1996. Understanding through metonymy: The role of metonymy in communication and cognition. In Beatrice Peñas (ed.), The pragmatics of understanding and misunderstanding, 197–208. Zaragoza: University of Zaragoza.
. 1998. On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics 30(3). 259–274.
Ruiz de Mendoza, Francisco José & Olga Diez. 2002. Patterns of conceptual integration. In René Dirven & Ralph Pörings (eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast, 489–352. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sinha, Chris. 1999. Situated selves. In Joan Bliss, Roger Saljo & Paul Light (eds.), Learning sites: Social and technological resources for learning, 32–46. Oxford: Pergamon.
Speelman, Dirk, Stefan Grondalaers & Dirk Geeraerts. 2003. Profile-based linguistic uniformity as a generic method for comparing language varieties. Computers and the Humanities 371. 317–337.
Sperber, Dan & Deidre Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Towards cognitive semantics. Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press.
Zlatev, Jordan. 2001. The epigenesis of meaning in human beings, and possibly in robots. Mind and Machines 111. 155–195.