Article published in:
Functions of Language
Vol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp. 143173


Barthes, Roland
1975An introduction to the structural analysis of narrative. New Literary History, 237–272. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Neil A. & Jane. B. Reece
2005Biology. San Francisco, CA: Pearson.Google Scholar
Christie, Frances & Beverly Derewianka
2008School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Coffin, Caroline
2006Historical discourse: The language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Doran, Y. J.
2017The discourse of physics: Building knowledge through language, mathematics and image. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gleason, Henry Allan Jr.
1965Linguistics and English grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1968Contrastive analysis in discourse structure. (Monograph Series on Languages and Linguistics 21). Georgetown University Institute of Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1994An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1998Things and relations. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), 185–235.Google Scholar
2007[1988]Some basic concepts of educational linguistics. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Language and education (The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday, Vol.9), 341–353. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & J. R. Martin
1993Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1999Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hao, Jing
2015Construing biology: An ideational perspective. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Hao, Jing & Sally Humphrey
2012The role of ‘coupling’ in biological experimental reports. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 5(2). 169–194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hood, Susan
2010Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Literacy in science: Learning to handle text as technology. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.), 166–202.Google Scholar
2008Incongruent and proud: De-vilifying ‘nominalization’. Discourse & Society 19(6). 801–810. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Systemic Functional Grammar: A next step into the theory: Axial relations. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
2017Revisiting field: Specialized knowledge in ancient history and biology secondary school discourse. In J. R. Martin, Karl Maton & Beatriz Quiroz (eds.), Onomázein, 111–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & David Rose
2007Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2008Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matruglio, Erika
2014Humanities’ humanity: Construing the social in HSC modern and ancient history, society and culture, and community and family studies. Sydney: University of Technology PhD Thesis.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & M. A. K. Halliday
1997/2009Systemic functional grammar: A first step into the theory. Beijing: Higher Education Press.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Kazuhiro Teruya & Marvin Lam
2010Key terms in systemic functional linguistics. Continuum.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L.
2005Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Orwell, George
1946Politics and the English Language. Horizon 13(6). 252–265.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik
1972A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sydney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ravelli, Louise
1999 [1985]Metaphor, mode and complexity: An exploration of co-varying patterns (Vol. no. 12). Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University.Google Scholar
Rothery, Joan
1994Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right: Resources for literacy and learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2014Grammatical metaphor and grammaticalisation: Fractal patterns in linguistic change. Paper presented at the 25th European Systemic Linguistic Conference, Université Paris Diderot, Paris.
Unsworth, Len
1997“Sound” explanations in school science: A functional linguistic perspective on effective apprenticing texts. Linguistics and Education 9(2). 199–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
1998Extended reality: Protonouns and the vernacular. In J. R. Martin & Robert Veel (eds.), 266–296.Google Scholar
Wignell, Peter
2007On the discourse of social science. Darwin: Charles Darwin University Press.Google Scholar
Wignell, Peter, J. R. Martin & Susan Eggins
1993The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (eds.), 151–183.Google Scholar
Yang, Y.
2011Grammatical metaphor in Chinese: A corpus based study. Functions of language 18(1). 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Dreyfus, Shoshana & Jing Hao
2020. A multi-stratal perspective on circumstantial meaning. Journal of World Languages 6:1-2  pp. 27 ff. Crossref logo
Martin, J. R.
2020. Genre and activity: a potential site for dialogue between Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) and Cultural Historical Activity Theory (CHAT). Mind, Culture, and Activity 27:3  pp. 216 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.