Cover not available
Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 17:1 (2010) ► pp.101–112
Book review

Christopher S. Butler, Raquel Hidalgo Downing & Julia Lavid (eds.). Functional Perspectives on Grammar and Discourse. In honour of Angela Downing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2007. xxx + 480 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 3095 9

Reviewed by
| University of Córdoba, Spain
Published online: 6 July 2010
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17.1.05gue
References (21)
References
Butler, Christopher S. 2003. Structure and function. A guide to three major structural-functional theories. Part 1: Approaches to the simplex clause. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Studies in Language Companion Series 631).Google Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar. Part 1: The structure of the clause. 2nd edn. Ed. Kees Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Functional Grammar Series 201).Google Scholar
Fawcett, Robin P. 2000. A theory of syntax for Systemic Functional Linguistics. Amsterdam: Benjamins. (Functional Grammar Series 2061). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk. 1990. A student’s grammar of the English language. London. Longman.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Speech acts. Syntax and semantics 31, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part I. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter. 1998. Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan. 1996. English nominalizations in the layered model of the sentence. In Betty Devriendt, Louis Goossens & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), Complex structures. A functionalist perspective, 325–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. (Functional Grammar series 171). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo & Pamela Faber. 2002. Functional Grammar and lexical templates. In Ricardo Mairal Usón & María Jesús Pérez Quintero (eds.), New perspectives on argument structure in Functional Grammar, 39–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2005. Brothers in arms? On the relations between Cognitive and Functional Linguistics? In Francisco J. Ruiz de Mendoza & M. Sandra Peña Cervel (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics. Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction, 69–100. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 321).Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1992. On verbal irony. Lingua 871. 53–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N. 1973. Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul. 1999. Text worlds. Representing conceptual space in discourse. Harlow: Longman/ Pearson Education Ltd.: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar