Book review
Ina Bornkessel-Schlesewsky & Matthias Schlesewsky. Processing syntax and morphology: a neurocognitive perspective [Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology, 6]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. xvi+360 pp. ISBN 978-0-19-920781-7
References (10)
Butler, Christopher S.
2008 Cognitive adequacy in three structural-functional theories of language.
Language Sciences 301, 1–30.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dik, Simon C.
1991 Functional Grammar. In
Flip G. Droste &
John E. Joseph (eds.),
Linguistic theory and grammatical description, 246–274. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fedorenko, Evelina, Po-Jang Hsieh, Alfonso Nieto-Castañón, Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli & Nancy Kanwisher
2010 A new method for fRMI investigations of language: Defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects.
Journal of Neurophysiology 1041. 1177–1194.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hengeveld, Kees & J. Lachlan Mackenzie
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar: A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2010 More tiles on the roof: further thoughts on incremental language production. In
Kasper Boye &
Elisabeth Engberg-Pedersen (eds.),
Language usage and language structure, 263–293. Berlin: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
Forthcoming.
Cognitive adequacy in a dialogic Functional Discourse Grammar.
Language Sciences.
Patel, Aniruddh D.
2008 Music, language, and the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poeppel, David & David Embick
2005 Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In
Anne Cutler (ed.),
Twenty-first century psycholinguistics: four cornerstones, 103–118. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumelhart, David E. & James L. McClelland
1986 On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In
James L. McClelland &
David E. Rumelhart (eds.),
Parallel distributed processing. Vol. 2: Psychological and biological models, 216–271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Jr., Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla
1997 Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by 1 other publications
Gattei, Carolina A., Yamila Sevilla, Ángel J. Tabullo, Alejandro J. Wainselboim, Luis A. París & Diego E. Shalom
2018.
Prominence in Spanish sentence comprehension: an eye-tracking study.
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33:5
► pp. 587 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.