Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 18:2 (2011) ► pp.292304
References
Andersen, Hans C.
2005The snowman. Six different versions. The Mulinco Project: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard
1984 [1933]Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans
(ed.) 2008Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2005Compounding and derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology. In Wolfgang Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations 109–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve & Herbert. H. Clark
1979When nouns surface as verbs. Language 551. 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortés Rodriguez, Francisco José
2006Derivational morphology in Role and Reference Grammar: A new proposal. RESLA: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 191. 41–66.Google Scholar
Cortés Rodriguez, Francisco José & Eulalia Sosa Acevedo
forthc.). La morfologia derivativa en la GPR. In Ricardo Mairal Usón, Lilián Guerrero & Carlos González eds. El funcionalismo en la teoria lingüística: La Gramática del Papel y la Referenda. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones Madrid Ediciones Akal
Coseriu, Eugenio
1978Gramática, semántica, universales. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C.
1989The theory of Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela
1996The semantics of get-passives. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David G. Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory in practice, 179–205. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1991Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel
2002Towards an RRG theory of morphology. Lecture delivered at The 2002 International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar . Universidad de La Rioja.
Garcia Velasco, Daniel & Kees Hengeveld
2002Do we need predicate frames? In Ricardo Mairal Usón & María Jesüs Pérez Quintero (eds.), New perspectives on argument structure in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series 251), 95–123. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
1998Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, 203–219. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez García, Francisco & Christopher S. Butler
2006Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 51. 39–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guest, Elizabeth & Ricardo Mairal Usón
2006Lexical representation based on a universal semantic metalanguage. RAEL, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. 41. 125–173.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
1971Passive resistance. In Douglas Adams, Mary Ann Campbell, Victor Cohen, Julie Lovins, Edward Maxwell, Carolyne Nygren & John Reighard (eds.), Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 149–162. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo
2002Lexical templates and syntactic structures: the design of the Lexical Constructional Model. Unpublished manuscript. Madrid: (UNED) Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.Google Scholar
Martin Arista, Javier
2008Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface, 85–115. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rubiales, Amalia
(eds.) 1998El Modelo Lexemdtico Funcional. El legado lingüistico de Leocadio Martin Mingorance. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Martin Zorraquino, Antonia
1979Las construcciones pronominales en espanol: paradigmas y desviaciones. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor Aleksandrovič
1989Semantic primitives from the viewpoint of Meaning-Text linguistic theory. Quaderni de Semantica X1. 65–102.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A.
2003Word meaning, sentence meaning and constructional meaning. In Hubert Cuyckens, René Dirven & John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on lexical semantics, 163–210. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2004Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 151. 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1998The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Ricardo Mairal Usón
2006Levels of semantic representation: where lexicon and grammar meet . Interlingüística 171. 26–47.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan
1966On voice in the English verb. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns. Semantic structure in lexical form. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description vol. 31, 150–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy LaPolla
1997Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr.
2005Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., Jr.
in press). Lexical representation, co-composition, and linking syntax and semantics. In James Pustejovsky & P. Bullion eds. New developments in the Generative Lexicon in press Dordrecht Kluwer DOI logo