Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 18:2 (2011) ► pp.292304
References (36)
References
Andersen, Hans C. 2005. The snowman. Six different versions. The Mulinco Project: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1984 [1933]. Language. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boas, Hans (ed.). 2008. Contrastive studies in Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2005. Compounding and derivation: Evidence for Construction Morphology. In Wolfgang Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations 109–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve & Herbert. H. Clark. 1979. When nouns surface as verbs. Language 551. 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortés Rodriguez, Francisco José. 2006. Derivational morphology in Role and Reference Grammar: A new proposal. RESLA: Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 191. 41–66.Google Scholar
Cortés Rodriguez, Francisco José & Eulalia Sosa Acevedo (forthc.). La morfologia derivativa en la GPR. In Ricardo Mairal Usón, Lilián Guerrero & Carlos González (eds.), El funcionalismo en la teoria lingüística: La Gramática del Papel y la Referenda. Introducción, avances y aplicaciones. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1978. Gramática, semántica, universales. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dik, Simon C. 1989. The theory of Functional Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela. 1996. The semantics of get-passives. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Carmel Cloran & David G. Butt (eds.), Functional descriptions: Theory in practice, 179–205. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3). 547–619. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Everett, Daniel. 2002. Towards an RRG theory of morphology. Lecture delivered at The 2002 International Conference on Role and Reference Grammar . Universidad de La Rioja.
Garcia Velasco, Daniel & Kees Hengeveld. 2002. Do we need predicate frames? In Ricardo Mairal Usón & María Jesüs Pérez Quintero (eds.), New perspectives on argument structure in Functional Grammar (Functional Grammar Series 251), 95–123. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 1998. Patterns of experience in patterns of language. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, 203–219. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzálvez García, Francisco & Christopher S. Butler. 2006. Mapping functional-cognitive space. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 51. 39–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guest, Elizabeth & Ricardo Mairal Usón. 2006. Lexical representation based on a universal semantic metalanguage. RAEL, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada. 41. 125–173.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin. 1971. Passive resistance. In Douglas Adams, Mary Ann Campbell, Victor Cohen, Julie Lovins, Edward Maxwell, Carolyne Nygren & John Reighard (eds.), Papers from the Seventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 149–162. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. A preliminary investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mairal Usón, Ricardo. 2002. Lexical templates and syntactic structures: the design of the Lexical Constructional Model. Unpublished manuscript. Madrid: (UNED) Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia.Google Scholar
Martin Arista, Javier. 2008. Unification and separation in a functional theory of morphology. In Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface, 85–115. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martín Rubiales, Amalia (eds.). 1998. El Modelo Lexemdtico Funcional. El legado lingüistico de Leocadio Martin Mingorance. Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Martin Zorraquino, Antonia. 1979. Las construcciones pronominales en espanol: paradigmas y desviaciones. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor Aleksandrovič. 1989. Semantic primitives from the viewpoint of Meaning-Text linguistic theory. Quaderni de Semantica X1. 65–102.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2003. Word meaning, sentence meaning and constructional meaning. In Hubert Cuyckens, René Dirven & John R. Taylor (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on lexical semantics, 163–210. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
2004. Type shifting in Construction Grammar: An integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics 151. 1–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1998. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José & Ricardo Mairal Usón. 2006. Levels of semantic representation: where lexicon and grammar meet . Interlingüística 171. 26–47.Google Scholar
Svartvik, Jan. 1966. On voice in the English verb. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns. Semantic structure in lexical form. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description vol. 31, 150–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. & Randy LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D., Jr. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(ed.). 2008. Investigations of the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., Jr. (in press). Lexical representation, co-composition, and linking syntax and semantics. In James Pustejovsky & P. Bullion (eds.), New developments in the Generative Lexicon (in press). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logo