Negation in complement clauses of fear-verbs
Complement clauses of verbs of fear often contain expletive negation, which is negative marking without negative
meaning. Expletive negation in fear-complements regularly co-occurs with non-indicative moods, such as subjunctive, conjunctive,
or conditional. The aim of this paper is to provide a diachronic explanation for the phenomenon of expletive negation in
complement clauses of fear-verbs. Based on data from various languages, I will show that cases of expletive negation after verbs
of fear can be divided into several groups, each with a different origin. Fear complement clauses can derive from embedded polar
questions, paratactic constructions expressing a wish, or from negative purpose clauses. Complement clauses with polar questions
usually contain an indicative verb form, while clauses based on the expression of a wish often have non-indicative verb forms. The
paper also discusses cases in which expletive negation is lost.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Fear complement clauses: The main patterns
- 2.1Fear-complements without expletive negation
- 2.2Fear-complements with expletive negation and indicative
- 2.3Fear-complements with expletive negation and non-indicative mood
- 2.4Summary
- 3.Functional motivation for the usage of expletive negation
- 3.1Functional motivation for the usage of expletive negation in clauses with an embedded question
- 3.2Functional motivation for the usage of expletive negation in complement clauses with a non-indicative mood
- 3.2.1Fear-complements with volitional forms
- 3.2.2Fear-complements with the subjunctive
- 3.2.2.1Fear-complements with a subjunctive derived from a wish-construction
- 3.2.2.2Fear-complements with a subjunctive derived from negative purpose
- 3.3Summary
- 4.Loss of expletive negation: Different stages of development
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References