Clause relationships in spoken and written English
Sidney Greenbaum | University College London
Gerald Nelson | University College London
There are opposing views on whether speech or writing is more complex syntactically. We investigated the complexity of clause relationships in a range of spoken and written text categories: spontaneous conversations, broadcast discussions, unscripted monologues, personal handwritten letters, academic writing, and non-academic writing. Conversations proved to be the most distinctive category. It had the highest percentage of simple clauses and the lowest percentage of both subordination and coordination. For all the other categories there is not a sharp distinction between speech and writing in any of the measures that were applied.
Published online: 01 January 1995
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.02gre
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.2.1.02gre
Cited by
Cited by 20 other publications
No author info given
2008.
In Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology [Applications of Cognitive Linguistics [ACL], ],
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey N. Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
2021.
In Grammar of Spoken and Written English,
Cantos, Pascual
2012.
In The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics,
► pp. 99 ff.
Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy
2017. Spoken Grammar: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?.
Applied Linguistics 38:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Engel, Dulcie M. & Marie-Eve A. Ritz
2000. The Use of the Present Perfect in Australian English.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 119 ff.
GONG, SHU-PING & PEI-YAN WU
2012. Collocation, Semantic Prosody, and Near-synonymy: The HELP Verbs in Mandarin Chinese.
International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages 24:01 ► pp. 3 ff.
Green, Clarence
2017.
In Patterns and Development in the English Clause System,
► pp. 169 ff.
Green, Clarence
2017. Introducing the Corpus of the Canon of Western Literature: A corpus for culturomics and stylistics.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 26:4 ► pp. 282 ff.
GREENBAUM, SIDNEY & GERALD NELSON
1996. Positions of adverbial clauses in British English.
World Englishes 15:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
GREENBAUM, SIDNEY & GERALD NELSON
1996. The International Corpus of English (ICE) Project.
World Englishes 15:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Huang, Qunying, Lixin Xia & Yun Xia
2018.
In Database Systems for Advanced Applications [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 10829],
► pp. 203 ff.
Hudson-Ettle, Diana
2002. Nominal that Clauses in Three Regional Varieties of English.
Journal of English Linguistics 30:3 ► pp. 258 ff.
Iyeiri, Y., M. Yaguchi & Y. Baba
2011. Principal component analysis of turn-initial words in spoken interactions.
Literary and Linguistic Computing 26:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Kirk, John M.
1997. Subordinate Clauses in English.
Journal of English Linguistics 25:4 ► pp. 349 ff.
Lastres-López, Cristina
2018. If -insubordination in spoken British English: Syntactic and pragmatic properties.
Language Sciences 66 ► pp. 42 ff.
Leong, Ping Alvin
2021. Writing in the Sciences and Humanities: A Clause-Complex Perspective.
<i>WORD</i> 67:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Leong Ping, Alvin & Geok Wee Bee
2005. Investigating the clause complex.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 149-150 ► pp. 47 ff.
Miller, Jim & Andreea S. Calude
2020.
In The Handbook of English Linguistics,
► pp. 547 ff.
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2001. Principles of Pattern Selection.
Journal of English Linguistics 29:4 ► pp. 295 ff.
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2019. Beyond Length: Investigating Dependency Distance Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels.
Open Linguistics 5:1 ► pp. 601 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 03 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.