Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theoretical developments and directions
Edited by Wendy L. Bowcher and Tom Bartlett
[Functions of Language 28:3] 2021
► pp. 243–259
Introduction to this special issue

Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics

Principles and parameters

ORCID logo | University of Glasgow
ORCID logo | Sun Yat-sen University
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: Context in social linguistics
  • 2.SFL and context: Underlying principles
  • 3.Parameters of context
  • 4.The paradigmatic representation of context of situation
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 7 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.20017.bar
References (46)
References
Bartlett, Tom. 2016. Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of mode. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 166–183. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 375–390.Google Scholar
. 2018. Rethinking (context of) culture in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Akila Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics, 26–46. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom & Gerard, O’Grady. (eds.). 2017. The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2007. Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(1). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, Eline Westinen & Sirpa Leppänen. 2015. Further notes on sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 12(1). 119–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L. 2013. Material action as choice in field. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 318–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Issues in developing unified systems for contextual field and mode. Functions of Language 21(2). 176–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics 5(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl. 1934. Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Butt, David G. & Rebekah Wegener. 2007. The work of concepts: Context and metafunction in the systemic functional model. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, Volume 2, 589–618. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Clarke, Benjamin. 2012. Do patterns of ellipsis in text support systemic functional linguistics’ ‘context-metafunction hook-up’ hypothesis? A corpus-based approach. Cardiff: Cardiff University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin. 1992. Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan. 1996. Context in language. In Dan Isaac Slobin, Julie Gerhadt, Amy Kiratzis & Jiansheng Guo (eds.), Social interaction, social context and language, 21–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. [1950] 1957. Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.). 2013. Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Maryland, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
1985. Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 3–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 [2007]. The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In Jonathan Webster (ed.). Language and education. Volume 9 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 269–290. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
1992. How do you mean? In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 20–35. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1985. Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1981. What’s going on: A dynamic view of context in language. In James E. Copeland & Philip W. Davis (eds.), The seventh LACUS forum, 1980, 106–121. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Part B. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 51–121.Google Scholar
. [1992] 2009. Rationality in everyday talk: From process to system. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics. Collected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2, 309–352. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
. 1995. The conception of context in text. In Peter Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic Functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 183–282. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
. 1999. Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–232. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett and Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 269–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions and semantics. Functional linguistics 1(9). 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. 2015. Language and complex systems. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay. 1984. Semiotics and education. In Monographs, working papers and prepublications of the Toronto Semiotic Circle, No.2, 23–62. Toronto: Victoria University.Google Scholar
. 1992. New challenges for Systemic-Functional Linguistics: Dialect diversity and language change. Network 181. 61–68.Google Scholar
. 2015. Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 589–616. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement to C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, The meaning of meaning, 10th edn., 1966), 296–336. New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar
. 1935. Coral gardens and their magic, Volume II. New York, NY: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Evolving systemic functional linguistics: Beyond the clause. Functional Linguistics 1(3). Available online at [URL]. DOI logo
Martin, J. R. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1991. Systemic typology and topology. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy in social processes: Papers from the inaugural Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics conference, 345–383. Darwin: Centre for Studies of Language in Education, Northern Territory University.Google Scholar
Moore, Alison Rotha. 2020. Progress and tensions in modelling register as a semantic configuration. Language, Context and Text 2(1). 22–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, Desmond. 1967. The Naked Ape. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick. 2019. Continuing issues in SFL. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), 204–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure de, Ferdinand. 1960. Cours de Linguistique Générale, 3rd edn. (eds. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam. 2019. Semantics. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), 55–91.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.). 2019. The Cambridge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Rebekah. 2011. Parameters of context: From theory to model and application. Sidney: Macquarie University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Arefeh Sadat Khoshniyat & Majid Amerian
2023. A Comparative Study of Intersemiotic Complementarity of Visual and Verbal Modes in Three English School Textbooks from Iran and Malaysia. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 6:3 ► pp. 131 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.