Introduction published In:
Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics: Theoretical developments and directions
Edited by Wendy L. Bowcher and Tom Bartlett
[Functions of Language 28:3] 2021
► pp. 243259
Bartlett, Tom
2016Multiscalar modelling of context: Some questions raised by the category of mode. In Wendy L. Bowcher & Jennifer Y. Liang (eds.), Society in language, language in society: Essays in honour of Ruqaiya Hasan, 166–183. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Context in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 375–390.Google Scholar
2018Rethinking (context of) culture in Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Akila Baklouti & Lise Fontaine (eds.), Perspectives from Systemic Functional Linguistics, 26–46. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom & Gerard, O’Grady
(eds.) 2017The Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2007Sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(1). 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, Eline Westinen & Sirpa Leppänen
2015Further notes on sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 12(1). 119–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowcher, Wendy L.
2013Material action as choice in field. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 318–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Issues in developing unified systems for contextual field and mode. Functions of Language 21(2). 176–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018The semiotic sense of context vs the material sense of context. Functional Linguistics 5(5). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Butt, David G. & Rebekah Wegener
2007The work of concepts: Context and metafunction in the systemic functional model. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective, Volume 2, 589–618. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Clarke, Benjamin
2012Do patterns of ellipsis in text support systemic functional linguistics’ ‘context-metafunction hook-up’ hypothesis? A corpus-based approach. Cardiff: Cardiff University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro & Charles Goodwin
1992Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1996Context in language. In Dan Isaac Slobin, Julie Gerhadt, Amy Kiratzis & Jiansheng Guo (eds.), Social interaction, social context and language, 21–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R.
[1950] 1957Papers in Linguistics, 1934–1951. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fontaine, Lise, Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady
(eds.) 2013Systemic Functional Linguistics: Exploring choice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
1967Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 1. Journal of Linguistics 3(1). 37–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Maryland, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
1985Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 3–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 [2007]The notion of ‘context’ in language education. In Jonathan Webster (ed.). Language and education. Volume 9 in the collected works of M. A. K. Halliday, 269–290. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
1992How do you mean? In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent theory and practice, 20–35. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan
1985Language, context and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Geelong, Vic.: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya
1981What’s going on: A dynamic view of context in language. In James E. Copeland & Philip W. Davis (eds.), The seventh LACUS forum 1980, 106–121. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
1985Part B. In M. A. K. Halliday & Ruqaiya Hasan, 51–121.Google Scholar
[1992] 2009Rationality in everyday talk: From process to system. In Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), Semantic variation: Meaning in society and in sociolinguistics. Collected papers of Ruqaiya Hasan, Volume 2, 309–352. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
1995The conception of context in text. In Peter Fries & Michael Gregory (eds.), Discourse in society: Systemic Functional perspectives: Meaning and choice in language: Studies for Michael Halliday, 183–282. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
1999Speaking with reference to context. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Text and context in functional linguistics, 219–232. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Choice, system, realisation: Describing language as meaning potential. In Lise Fontaine, Tom Bartlett and Gerard O’Grady (eds.), 269–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Towards a paradigmatic description of context: Systems, metafunctions and semantics. Functional linguistics 1(9). 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A.
2015Language and complex systems. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemke, Jay
1984Semiotics and education. In Monographs, working papers and prepublications of the Toronto Semiotic Circle, No.2, 23–62. Toronto: Victoria University.Google Scholar
1992New challenges for Systemic-Functional Linguistics: Dialect diversity and language change. Network 181. 61–68.Google Scholar
2015Feeling and meaning: A unitary bio-semiotic account. In Peter Pericles Trifonas (ed.), International handbook of semiotics, 589–616. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw
1923The problem of meaning in primitive languages. Supplement to C. K. Ogden & I. A. Richards, The meaning of meaning, 10th edn. 1966), 296–336. New York, NY: Harcourt.Google Scholar
1935Coral gardens and their magic, Volume II. New York, NY: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R.
1992English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Evolving systemic functional linguistics: Beyond the clause. Functional Linguistics 1(3). Available online at [URL]. DOI logo
Martin, J. R. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
1991Systemic typology and topology. In Frances Christie (ed.), Literacy in social processes: Papers from the inaugural Australian Systemic Functional Linguistics conference, 345–383. Darwin: Centre for Studies of Language in Education, Northern Territory University.Google Scholar
Moore, Alison Rotha
2020Progress and tensions in modelling register as a semantic configuration. Language, Context and Text 2(1). 22–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morris, Desmond
1967The Naked Ape. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick
2019Continuing issues in SFL. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), 204–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saussure de, Ferdinand
1960Cours de Linguistique Générale, 3rd edn. (eds. Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Taverniers, Miriam
2019Semantics. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), 55–91.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal
(eds.) 2019The Cambridge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegener, Rebekah
2011Parameters of context: From theory to model and application. Sidney: Macquarie University PhD thesis.Google Scholar