I think, I mean and I believe in political discourse: Collocates, functions and distribution

Fetzer, Anita

doi:10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet

Article published In:

Discourse linguistics: Theory and practice
Edited by Karin Aijmer and Anita Fetzer
[Functions of Language 21:1] 2014
► pp. 67–94

I think, I mean and I believe in political discourse

Collocates, functions and distribution

Anita Fetzer | University of Augsburg

This article examines the distribution, collocates and function of the first-person-singular cognitive-verb-based syntagmatic configurations I think, I mean and I believe in argumentative political discourse, considering their status as parenthetical construction and pragmatic marker in two sets of spoken data: monologic speech and dialogic interview. Its goal is to identify discourse-domain-specific discourse patterns, which manifest themselves in patterned co-occurrences with other pragmatic markers, and with expressions of modality and evidentiality. The explicit accommodation of local context allows for a fine-grained analysis of the three constructions, filtering out those contextual configurations in which I think, I mean and I believe may count as a pragmatic marker.

Published online: 7 April 2014

https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.05fet

References (46)

Aijmer, Karin. 1997. I think — an English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages. Historical and comparative perspectives , 1–47. Berlin: Mouton.

2009. Seem and evidentiality. Functions of Language 161. 63–88.

Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds.). 2006. Pragmatic markers in contrast . Oxford: Elsevier.

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality . Oxford: OUP.

Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar . Cambridge: CUP.

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing . Cambridge: CUP.

Bongelli, Ramona & Andrzej Zuczkowski. 2008. Indicatori linguistici percettivi e cognitivi . Roma: Aracne.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2001. From matrix clause to pragmatic marker. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2(2). 177–199.

2008. The comment clause in English. Syntactic origins and pragmatic developments . Cambridge: CUP.

Bußmann, Hadumod. 1996. Routledgedictionary of language and linguistics. London: Routledge.

Celle, Agnes & Ruth Huart (eds.). 2007. Connectives as discourse landmarks . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Chafe, Wallace. 1996. Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds.), Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology , 261–272. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Dendale, Patrick & Liliane Tasmowski. 2001. Introduction: Evidentiality and related notions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 339–348.

Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit . Paris: Minuit.

Erman, Britt. 1987. Pragmatic expressions in English. A study of you know, you see and I mean in face-to-face conversation . Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Media discourse . London: Arnold.

Faller, Martina. 2002. Semantics and pragmatics of evidentials in Cuzco Quechua . Stanford: Stanford University PhD thesis.

Fetzer, Anita. 2007. Reformulation and common grounds. In Anita Fetzer & Kerstin Fischer (eds.), Lexical markers of common grounds , 157–179. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

2008. ‘And I think that is a very straight forward way of dealing with it.’: The communicative function of cognitive verbs in political discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 27(4). 384–396.

2011. “I think this is I mean perhaps this is too erm too tough a view of the world, but I often think...”: Cognitive verbs in political discourse. Language Sciences 33(2). 255–267.

Fetzer, Anita & Marjut Johansson. 2010. Cognitive verbs in context: A contrastive analysis of English and French argumentative discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15(2). 240–266.

Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to discourse particles . Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Fraser, Bruce. 1987. Pragmatic formatives. In Jef Verschueren & Marcella Bertuccelli-Papi (eds.), The pragmatic perspective , 179–194. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Garfinkel, Harold. 1994. Studies in ethnomethodology . Cambridge: Politi Press.

Givón, Talmy. 1993. English grammar: A function-based introduction . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Grice, Herbert P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L Morgan. (eds.), Syntax and semantics , vol. III1, 41–58. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar , 2nd edn. London: Arnold.

Hooper, Joan B. 1975. On assertive predicates. In John P. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and semantics , vol. 41, 91–124. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and relevance . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Jucker, Andreas & Yael Ziv (eds.). 1998. Discourse markers . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2009a. English comment clauses: Position, prosody, and scope. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 34(1). 49–75.

2009b. Initial I think: Main or comment clause? Discourse and Interaction 2(1). 49–70.

Kärkkäinen, Elise. 2003. Epistemic stance in English conversation. A description of its interactional functions, with a focus on ‘I think’ . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics . London: Longman.

Mushin, Ilana. 2001. Evidentiality and epistemological stance . Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Subjectivity as an evidential dimension in epistemic modal expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 383–400.

Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers . Cambridge: CUP.

Searle, John. 2010. Making the social world . Oxford: OUP.

Shinzato, Rumiko. 2004. Some observations concerning mental verbs and speech act verbs. Journal of Pragmatics 361. 861–882.

Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2000. The functions of I think in political discourse. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 10(1). 41–63.

Thompson, Sandra & Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization , 313–348. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Tottie, Gunnel. 2014. On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language 21(1). 6–29.

Traugott, Elizabeth. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation , 31–54. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Van Bogaert, Julie. 2006. I guess, I suppose and I believe as pragmatic markers: Grammaticalization and functions. Belgian Essays on Language and Literature 41. 129–149.

Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity . Oxford: OUP.

Watzlawick, Paul, Janet H. Beavin & Don D. Jackson. 1967. Pragmatics of human communication. A study of interactional patterns, pathologies and paradoxes . New York, NY: Norton.

Cited by (38)

Cited by 38 other publications

Order by:

Biri, Ylva

2024. Chapter 2. Personal conviction against general knowledge. In Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 342], ► pp. 14 ff.

Fu, Yanli, Muhammad Afzaal & Dina Abdel Salam El-Dakhs

2024. Investigating discourse markers “you know” and “I mean” in mediatized English political interviews: a corpus-based comparative study. Frontiers in Communication 9

Hiltunen, Turo & Turo Vartiainen

2024. A corpus-pragmatic analysis of linguistic democratisation in the British Hansard. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2 ► pp. 245 ff.

Klumm, Matthias

2024. Peripheries and their internal structure: an empirical analysis of left- and right-peripheral sequences across written English discourse. Linguistics

Wei, Jilan

2024. I think and I know: Authority and solidarity in UK government Covid briefings. Journal of Pragmatics 223 ► pp. 31 ff.

Cuenca, Maria-Josep

2023. Disagreement, epistemic stance and contrastive marking in Catalan parliamentary debate. Journal of Pragmatics 203 ► pp. 1 ff.

Hu, Jian

2023. The Lexical and Syntactic Properties of MM. In A Constructional Approach to Interpersonal Metaphor of Modality [Peking University Linguistics Research, 7], ► pp. 67 ff.

Hu, Jian

2023. Towards a Constructional Approach to Metaphor of Modality. In A Constructional Approach to Interpersonal Metaphor of Modality [Peking University Linguistics Research, 7], ► pp. 29 ff.

Hu, Jian

2023. The Pragmatics and Discourse Functions of MM. In A Constructional Approach to Interpersonal Metaphor of Modality [Peking University Linguistics Research, 7], ► pp. 105 ff.

Taguchi, Naoko & Marianna Gracheva

2023. Stative verbs and perceptions of intensity: The case of ‘believe’ in simple and progressive aspect. Applied Corpus Linguistics 3:3 ► pp. 100072 ff.

Westra, Evan

2023. Symbolic belief in social cognition. Philosophical Perspectives 37:1 ► pp. 388 ff.

Adams, Zoë, Agata Ludwiczak, Devyani Sharma & Magda Osman

2022. Verbal interaction in a social dilemma. Rationality and Society 34:3 ► pp. 334 ff.

Liu, Ming

2022. Stancetaking in Hong Kong political discourse. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1 ► pp. 79 ff.

Pastuch, Magdalena

2022. O rozwoju dyskursywnej funkcji form rozkazujących (na przykładzie słuchaj). LingVaria 17:2(34) ► pp. 143 ff.

Soler Bonafont, María Amparo

2022. Esto es lo que creo… El dominio de la opinión en el español hablado a través de los usos construccionales de creo. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 91 ► pp. 219 ff.

Zhou, Jiangping & Yanmei Gao

2022. A corpus-based study of grammatical post-metaphorical expressions. Journal of World Languages 7:2 ► pp. 247 ff.

Jaakola, Minna

2021. Marking one’s own viewpoint: The Finnish evidential verb+kseni‘as far as I understand’ construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 44:3 ► pp. 255 ff.

Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu

2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 13 ff.

Ruskan, Anna

2021. Visual perception-based adverbials: Cross-linguistic equivalence and differences. Journal of Pragmatics 186 ► pp. 208 ff.

Deppermann, Arnulf & Silke Reineke

2020. Practices of indexing discrepant assumptions with Germanich dachte(‘I thought’) in talk-in-interaction. Functions of Language 27:2 ► pp. 113 ff.

Furkó, Péter B.

2020. Discourse Markers from a Critical Perspective: Some Theoretical Issues. In Discourse Markers and Beyond, ► pp. 65 ff.

Hart, Christopher & Matteo Fuoli

2020. Objectification strategies outperform subjectification strategies in military interventionist discourses. Journal of Pragmatics 162 ► pp. 17 ff.

Li, Tao

2020. Representing China in Translations of Two Korean News Outlets: A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis Approach. In Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies in Chinese Contexts, ► pp. 183 ff.

Soler Bonafont, M. Amparo

2020. Usos discursivos de la forma verbal doxásticacreoen la interacción oral en español. Pragmática Sociocultural / Sociocultural Pragmatics 8:2 ► pp. 204 ff.

Fronhofer, Nina-Maria

2019. Chapter 9. My anger was justified surely?. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 213 ff.

Netz, Hadar & Ron Kuzar

2019. Discourse and metadiscourse of Hebrew SOV in the heated parliamentary arena. Journal of Pragmatics 141 ► pp. 67 ff.

Schubert, Christoph

2019. ‘OK, well, first of all, let me say …’: Discursive uses of response initiators in US presidential primary debates. Discourse Studies 21:4 ► pp. 438 ff.

Szczyrbak, Magdalena

2019. EPISTEMIC STANCE IN THE KAVANAUGH CONFIRMATION HEARING: FOCUS ON MENTAL AND COMMUNICATION VERBS. Discourse and Interaction 12:2 ► pp. 72 ff.

Szczyrbak, Magdalena

2020. VERB PATTERNS IN TRIAL DISCOURSE: THE CASE OF I THINK. Discourse and Interaction 13:2 ► pp. 119 ff.

Szczyrbak, Magdalena

2021. I’m thinkingandyou’re saying: Speaker stance and the progressive of mental verbs in courtroom interaction. Text & Talk 41:2 ► pp. 239 ff.

Hoek, Jet, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Ted J.M. Sanders

2018. Segmenting discourse: Incorporating interpretation into segmentation?. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14:2 ► pp. 357 ff.

Hoffmann, Christian R.

2018. Crooked Hillary and Dumb Trump. Internet Pragmatics 1:1 ► pp. 55 ff.

Ranger, Graham

2018. I think: Further Variations in Subjective Endorsement. In Discourse Markers, ► pp. 275 ff.

Furko, Peter

2017. Manipulative uses of pragmatic markers in political discourse. Palgrave Communications 3:1

Hofmockel, Carolin

2017. Patterns of (inter)subjectivity. Functions of Language 24:2 ► pp. 166 ff.

Polymeneas, George

2017. Chapter 3. “Today I know, we know, that these sacrifices are heavy, but necessary”. In Greece in Crisis [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 70], ► pp. 83 ff.

Chor, Winnie Oi-Wan, Foong Ha Yap & Tak-Sum Wong

2016. Chinese interrogative particles as talk coordinators at the right periphery. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17:2 ► pp. 178 ff.

Kozubíková Šandová, Jana

2015. On the use of cognitive verbs in political interviews. Brno Studies in English 41:1 ► pp. 41 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.