Article published in:
Discourse linguistics: Theory and practice
Edited by Karin Aijmer and Anita Fetzer
[Functions of Language 21:1] 2014
► pp. 95118
References

References

Aijmer, Karin.
1996 Conversational routines in English. Convention and creativity . London: Longman.Google Scholar
2007The interface between discourse and grammar: ‘The fact is that’. In Agnès Celle & Ruth Huart (eds.), Connectives as discourse landmarks , 31–46. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The actuality adverbs ‘in fact’, ‘actually’, ‘really’ and ‘indeed’ — establishing similarities and differences. In Martin Edwardes (ed.), Proceedings of the BAAL Annual Conference 2007 , 111–120. London: BAAL and Scitsiugnil Press.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y..
2009Semantics and grammar in clause linking. In R.M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The semantics of clause linking. A cross-linguistic typology , 380–402. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bergs, Alexander & Gabriele Diewald (
eds) 2008 Constructions and language change . Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J..
1996 Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions . Amsterdam: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English. In Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds.), The handbook of the history of English , 307–334. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott.
2005 Lexicalization and language change . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan.
2002Sequentiality as the basis of constituent structure. In Talmy Givón & Bertram F. Malle (eds.), The evolution of language out of pre-language , 109–132. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), 602–623.
2006From usage to grammar. The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott.
1994Grammaticalization and linguistic theory. In Jule Gómez de García & David Rood (eds.), Proceedings of the 1993 Mid-America Linguistics Conference and Conference on Siouan/Caddoan Languages , 1–22. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (
ed) 2006 Approaches to discourse particles . Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th.
2011Commentary: Corpus-based methods. In Kathryn Allan & Justyna A. Robinson (eds.), Current methods in historical semantics , 184–195. Berlin: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Ruqaiya Hasan.
1976 Cohesion in English . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. & Christian Matthiessen.
2004 An introduction to functional grammar , 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hovy, Eduard H. & Elisabeth Maier.
1995 Parsimonious or profligate? How many and which discourse structure relations? Technical report, University of Southern California.
Joseph, Brian D. & Richard D. Janda (
eds) 2003 The handbook of historical linguistics . Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul.
1992At least. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eve F. Kittay (eds.), Frames, fields and contrasts: New essays in semantic and lexical organization , 309–331. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja.
2010Data in historical pragmatics. In Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), Historical pragmatics , 33–68. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian.
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20. 303–318.Google Scholar
2002New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization , 1–18. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula.
2010 Argument and rhetoric. Adverbial connectors in the history of English . Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C..
2000 Presumptive meanings . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Diana M..
2006Discourse markers in English: A discourse-pragmatic view. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 43–59.
2012Late Modern English: Pragmatics and discourse. In Alexander Bergs & Brinton Laurel J. (eds.), Historical linguistics of English: An international handbook , 901–915. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson.
1986Relational propositions in discourse. Discourse Processes 9(1). 57–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987Antithesis: A study in clause combining and discourse structure. In Rosalind Steele & Terry Threadgold (eds.), Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday , 359–384. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk.
2007Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rossari, Corinne
2006Formal properties of a subset of discourse markers: Connectives. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 299–314.
Schiffrin, Deborah.
1987 Discourse markers . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwenter, Scott & Elizabeth C. Traugott.
2000Invoking scalarity. The development of ‘in fact’. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1). 7–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike.
2008 WordSmith Tools 5 , Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Karin Aijmer.
2008 The semantic field of modal certainty: A corpus-based study of English adverbs . Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril.
1988 Sentence adverbials in English. A synchronic and diachronic investigation . Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve E..
1990 From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C..
1995The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the Twelfth International Conference on Historical Linguistics (ICHL-12) , Manchester, August 1995.
1999The rhetoric of counter-expectation in semantic change: A study in subjectification. In Peter Koch & Andreas Blank (eds.), Historical semantics and cognition , 177–196. Berlin: Mouton.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), 624–647.
2011Towards an integrated account of grammatical constructionalization. Paper given at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europeae , Logroño, 8–11 September 2011.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Richard Dasher.
2002 Regularity in semantic change . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Graeme Trousdale.
2013 Constructionalization and constructional changes . Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme & Muriel Norde.
2013Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences 36. 32–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Ziegeler, Debra, Eric Mélac & Volker Gast
2019. The rise of right periphery either in English. Language Sciences 75  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 august 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.