The aim of this study is to explore the relationship between the forms of clause combination and their systematic patterns of explicit inter-clausal coherence. The study is conducted within the theoretical framework of the Adaptive Approach. The Adaptive Approach conceives of combined clauses as a hierarchy of conventionalized units for discourse coherence management. The grammatical properties of the different combined clauses determine their position on the hierarchy, and these properties are claimed to correlate with whether the construction is more, or less, of a cohesive unit for packaging multiple propositions. The study pursues the hypothesis that clauses higher on the hierarchy, being the more cohesive grammatical constructions, should tend to manage coherence between the propositions they combine (i.e. the clausal constituents) through fewer explicit discourse-pragmatic ties than the clauses considered less cohesive grammatical constructions. An analysis of cohesive ties in 450 combined clauses, representing 9 different English clause types, bears out these expectations. This is a significant result indicating that an inverse relationship exists between the level of grammatical integration and the frequency of inter-clausal cohesive ties. It is argued to be a quantifiable consequence of grammatical hierarchy, reflecting a continuum of coherence management from discourse to grammar.
Dahl, Östen. 2001. Grammaticalization and the life cycles of constructions. RASK Internationalt tidsskrift for sprog og kommunikation 141. 91–134.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2008. Functional motivations in the development of nominal and verbal gerunds in Middle and Early Modern English. English Language and Linguistics 121. 55–102.
De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. English -ing clauses and their problems: The structure of grammatical categories. Linguistics 48(6). 1153–1193.
Diessel, Holger. 2005. Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 43(3). 449–470.
Disterheft, Dorothy. 1981. Remarks on the history of the Indo-European infinitive. Folia Linguistica Historica 2(1). 3–34.
Dixon, R.M.W. 2005. A semantic approach to English grammar. Oxford: OUP.
Downing, Angela & Philip Locke. 2006. English grammar: A university course. London: Routledge.
Du Bois, John W. 2003. Argument structure. In John W.Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf & William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred argument structure: Grammar as architecture for function, 11–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Duffley, Patrick. 2006. The English gerund-participle: A comparison with infinitives. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Fischer, Olga & Wim van der Wurff. 2006. Syntax. In Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds.), A history of the English language, 109–199. Cambridge: CUP.
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Givón, Talmy. 1993. English grammar: A function-based introduction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 2007. Grammar as an adaptive evolutionary product. In Christopher S. Butler, Raquel Downing & Julia Lavid (eds.), Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse: In honour of Angela Downing, 1–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Givón, Talmy. 2012a. The adaptive approach to grammar. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), 27–51.
Givón, Talmy. 2012b. Toward a diachronic typology of relative clauses. In Bernard Comrie & Zarina Fernández (eds.), Relative clauses in languages of the Americas: A typological overview, 3–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog (eds.). 2012. The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. Oxford: OUP.
Hopper, Paul & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey Pullum (eds.). 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: CUP.
Huettner, Alison, Marie Vaughan & David D. McDonald. 1987. Constraints on the generation of adjunct clauses.
Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
, 207–214.
Knoch, Ute. 2009. Diagnostic writing assessment: The development and validation of a rating scale. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Lehmann, Christian. 1988. Towards a typology of clause linkage. In John Haiman & Sandra Thompson (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse, 181–225. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. 2002. Combining clauses into clause complexes: A multi-faceted view. In Joan Bybee & Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 235–319. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Moessner, Lilo. 2003. Diachronic English linguistics: An introduction. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
Morris, Jane & Grahame Hirst. 1991. Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Computational Linguistics 17(1). 21–48.
Traugott, Elizabeth. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the
International Conference on Historical Linguistics 12
, Manchester.
Van Valin Jr., Robert. 2005. Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: CUP.
Winter, Eugene. 1977. A clause relational approach to English texts: A study of some predicative lexical items in written discourse. International Science 61. 1–92.
2017. Discourse Coherence and Clause Combination. In Patterns and Development in the English Clause System, ► pp. 149 ff.
Trnavac, Radoslava & Maite Taboada
2016. Cataphora, backgrounding and accessibility in discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 93 ► pp. 68 ff.
Ortega, Lourdes
2015. Syntactic complexity in L2 writing: Progress and expansion. Journal of Second Language Writing 29 ► pp. 82 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.