Review published In:
Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 132141
References (10)
References
Detges, Ulrich & Richard Waltereit. 2007. Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 61. 61–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to discourse particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2006a. Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 1–20.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Frames, constructions and invariant meanings: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), 427–447.Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 311. 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven. 2014. Oui, il y a des particules de demodulation en francais. CogniTextes 111 (= [URL]) DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2012. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), Intersections of intersubjectivity. Special issue of English Text Construction 51, 7–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Ulrich Detges. 2009. Diachronic pathways and pragmatic strategies: different types of pragmatic particles from a diachronic point of view. In Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds.), Current trends in diachronic semantics and pragmatics, 43–61. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2001. Modal particles and their functional equivalents: A speech-act theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 331. 1391–1417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Abtönung: Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar