Cover not available
Review published In:
Sensory Perceptions in Language and Cognition
Edited by Rosario Caballero and Carita Paradis
[Functions of Language 22:1] 2015
► pp. 142–149
Book review

John A. Bateman. Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. Oxford: Routledge, 2014. xvi+276 pp. ISBN 978-0-415-84197-9(hbk) 978-0-415-84198-6(pbk) 978-1-315-77397-1(ebk)

Reviewed by
| Guangdong University of Finance
Published online: 1 May 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.22.1.07wen
References (31)
References
Barthes, Roland. 1977/1964. The rhetoric of the image. In Stephen Heath (ed.), Image-music-text, 32–51. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bateman, John. 2008. Multimodality and genre: A foundation for the systematic analysis of multimodal documents. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bateman, John & Karl-Heinrich Schmidt. 2012. Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cohn, Neil. 2013. Beyond speech balloons and thought bubbles: The integration of text and image. Semiotica 1971. 35–63.Google Scholar
Fang, Zhihui. 1996. Illustrations, text, and the child reader: What are pictures in children’s storybooks for? Reading Horizons 37(2). 130–142.Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. J. 2009. Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor as a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In Charles J. Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 19–42. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Gaede, Werner. 1981. Vom Wort zum Bild: Kreativ-Methoden der Visualisierung. Munich: Langen-Müller / Herbig.Google Scholar
Groensteen, Thierry. 2007/1999. The System of comics. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi. [Translated by Bart Beaty & Nick Nguyen from the original French Système de la bande desinée (1999)].Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqayia Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kloepfer, Rolf. 1977. Komplementarität von Sprache und Bild. Am Beispiel von Comic, Karikatur und Reklame. In Roland Posner & Hans-Peter Reinecke (eds.), Zeichenprozesse. Semiotische Forschung in den Einzelwissenschaften, 129–145. Wiesbaden: Athenaum.Google Scholar
Kress, Gunther & Theo van Leeuwen. 1996. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liu, Yu & Kay O’Halloran. 2009. Intersemiotic texture: Analyzing cohesive devices between language and images. Social Semiotics 41. 367–388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maes, Alfons A. & Joost Schilperoord. 2007. Classifying visual rhetoric: Conceptual and structural heuristics. In E. F. McQuarrie & B. J. Phillips (eds.), Go figure! New directions in advertising rhetoric, 67–78. New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe Inc.Google Scholar
McCloud, Scott. 1994. Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York, NY: HarperPerennial.Google Scholar
McQuarrie, Edward F. & David G. Mick. 1996. Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4). 424–438. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1999. Visual rhetoric in advertising: Text-interpretive, experimental, and reader-response analyses. Journal of Consumer Research 26(1). 37–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mann, William C. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8(3). 243–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Emily E. & Marylin D. White. 2003. A taxonomy of relationships between images and text. Journal of Documentation 59(6). 647–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1992. English text: Systems and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinec, Radan & Andrew Salway. 2005. A system for image-text relations in new (and old) media. Visual Communication 4(3). 337–371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolajeva, Maria & Carole Scott. 2001. How picture books work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, Kay L. 1999. Interdependence, interaction and metaphor in multisemiotic texts. Social Semiotics 9(3). 317–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Barbara J. & Edward F. McQuarrie. 2004. Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in adverting. Marketing Theory 4(1/2). 113–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Royce, Terry D. 2007. Intersemiotic complementarity: A framework for multimodal discourse analysis. In Terry D. Royce & Wendy L. Bowcher (eds.), New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse, 63–110. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schriver, Karen. 1997. Dynamics in document design: Creating texts for readers. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Scott, Linda. M. 1994. Images in advertising: The need for a theory of visual rhetoric. Journal of Consumer Research 21(2). 252–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spillner, Bernd. 1982. Stilanalyse semiotisch komplexer Texte. Zum Verhältnis von sprachlicher undbildlicher Information in Werbeanzeigen. Kodikas/Code. Ars Semiotica 4/5(1). 91–106.Google Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut. 1997. Textstil und Semiotik englischsprachiger Anzeigenwerbung. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1991. Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television. Continuum: Journal of media and cultural studies 5(1). 76–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Introducing social semiotics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
van Mulken, Margot. 2003. Analyzing rhetorical devices in print advertisements. Document Design 4(2). 114–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar