Article published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 22:2 (2015) ► pp.161–191
Appraisal and the language of wine appreciation
A critical discussion of the potential of the Appraisal framework as a tool to analyse specialised genres
This paper explores the language used by critics to appraise wine, at the same time investigating the validity and usefulness of categories in the Appraisal framework, as set out by Martin & White (2005). Our analysis of a corpus of wine reviews suggests that sub-categories of Appreciation — used to evaluate products, and non-human targets by reference to aesthetics and other values — may need extending or enhancing in terms of delicacy, depending on the register of the texts under investigation. An adapted version of the Appraisal system of Attitude is used as basis for our investigation. The assessment of our adapted model was carried out in the form of a comparison between two analysts’ independent annotations which function as a basis for a critical discussion of the proposed categories. The bulk of the paper discusses the relevance of our findings for the analysis of specialised genres in general, the field of wine criticism in particular and the application of the Appraisal model for discourse analysis. We conclude that the understanding and application of analytical categories is dependent on the analyst’s previous experience with the Appraisal model as well as acquaintance with the discourse field.
References (56)
Adendorff, Ralph & Vivian de Klerk. 2006. The role of appraisal resources in discussing aids. In Vivian de Klerk (ed.), Corpus linguistics and world Englishes. An analysis of Xhosa English, 70–88. London: Continuum.
ben-Aaron, Diana. 2005a. Given and news: Media discourse and the construction of community on national days. Helsinki: University of Helsinki PhD thesis.
. 2005b. Given and news: Evaluation in newspaper stories about national anniversaries. Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 25(5). 691–718. 
Beardsley, Monroe C. 1981. Aesthetics. Problems in the philosophy of criticism. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.
Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion talk across corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
. 2009. Language patterns and attitude. Functions of Language 16(2). 165–192.
Caballero, Rosario. 2007. Manner-of-motion verbs in wine description. Journal of Pragmatics 391. 2095–2114.
. 2009. Cutting across the senses. Imagery in winespeak and audiovisual promotion. In Charles Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphors, 73–94. Berlin: Mouton.
Caballero, Rosario & Ernesto Suárez Toste. 2010. A genre approach to imagery in winespeak. In Graham Low, Alice Deignan, Zazie Todd & Lynne Cameron (eds.), Researching and applying metaphor in the real world, 265–287. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Charters, Stephen. 2007. On the evaluation of wine quality. In Barry C. Smith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 157–182. Oxford: Signal books.
Don, A. 2007a. A framework for the investigation of interactive norms and the construction of textual identity in written discourse communities: The case of an email discussion list. Birmingham: University of Birmingham PhD thesis.
Don, Alexanne. 2007b. An approach to the analysis of textual identity through profiles of evaluative disposition.
ASFLA 2007 proceedings
.
. 2009. Legitimating tenor relationships: Affiliation and alignment in written interaction. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 5(3). 1–23.
Dreyfus, Shoshana, Namali Tilakaratna & Tobin Bales. 2013. Appraisal question. Paper presented at the
Appraisal Symposium
20–21 February 2013, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Folkeryd, Jenny W. 2006. Writing with an attitude. Appraisal and student texts in the school subject of Swedish. Uppsala: Uppsala University PhD thesis.
Fuoli, Matteo. 2012. Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication 6(1). 55–80.
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg. Forthcoming. Optimizing transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10(3).
Gawel, Richard, Anita Oberholster & Leigh Francis. 2000. A ‘mouth-feel wheel’: Terminology for communicating the mouth-feel characteristics of red wine. Australian Journal of Grape Wine Research 6(3). 203–207. Available online at [URL]. Date of access 3 March 2011.
Gluck, Malcolm. 2003. Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak? In Jean Aitchison & Diana M. Lewis (eds.), New media language, 107–115. London: Routledge.
Goode, Jamie. 2007. Wine and the brain. In Barry C. Smith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 79–98. Oxford: Signal Books.
. The wineanorak’s glossary of wine terms. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
Grapestomper glossary of wine terms. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
Hawkins, Anthony. 1995. Glossary of wine-tasting terminology for the FOODWINE list. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
Hommerberg, Charlotte. 2011. Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine. The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University PhD thesis.
. 2015. Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining appraisal and argumentation. Text & Talk 351. 155–175.
Hommerberg, Charlotte & Carita Paradis. 2014. Constructing credibility in wine reviews. Evidentiality, temporality and epistemic control. In Dylan Glynn & Mette Sjölin (eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity: Corpus, discourse, and literary approaches to stance, 211–238. Lund: Lund University Press.
Hood, Susan. 2006. The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(1). 37–49.
. 2008. Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meanings in processes of change. Linguistics and Education 19(4). 351–365.
Hood, Susan & James R. Martin. 2007. Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language. A functional perspective, 739–764. London & Oakville, CT: Equinox.
Humphrey, Sally & Louise Droga. 2002. Getting started with functional grammar. Berry, NSW: Target Texts.
Hunston, Susan. 2000. Evaluation and the planes of discourse. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 176–207. Oxford: OUP.
Kaltenbacher, Martin. 2006. Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive and the factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of Appraisal. In Geoff Thompson & Susan Hunston (eds.), System and corpus. Exploring connections, 269–292. London: Equinox.
Lehrer, Adrienne. 1975. Talking about wine. Language 51(4). 901–923.
. 1983. Wine and conversation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
. 2007. Can wines be brawny? In Barry C. Smith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 127–140. Oxford: Signal Books.
. 2009. Wine and conversation. 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.
MacKen-Horarik, Mary. 2003. Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text 23(2). 285–312.
Martin, James R. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: OUP.
Martin, James R. & David Rose. 2003. Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R White. 2005. The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
O’Donnell, Mick. 2007. The UAM CorpusTool Version 2.8.2. Wagsoft. Available at [URL].
Paradis, Carita & Charlotte Hommerberg. Forthcoming. We drink with our eyes first — the web of sensory perceptions, aesthetic experiences and mixed imagery in wine reviews. In Raymond Gibbs (ed.), Mixing metaphors. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Read, Jonathan & John Carroll. 2012. Annotating expressions of Appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 461. 421–447.
Rothery, Joan. 1994. Exploring literacy in school English. Write it right project. Erskineville: Disadvantaged Schools Program, Department of School Education.
Shapin, Steven. 2005. Hedonistic fruit bombs. London Review of Books 27(3). 30–32. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
Shesgreen, Sean. 2003. Wet dogs and gushing oranges: Winespeak for a new millennium. Chronicle Review [Online], 491. Available at [URL]. Date of access 7 December 2013.
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 231. 193–229.
Taboada, Maite & Marta Carretero. 2012. Contrastive analyses of evaluation in text: Key issues in the design of an annotation system for Attitude applicable to consumer reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6 (1–3). 275–295.
Tann, Ken. 2010. Semogenesis of a nation. An iconography of Japanese identity. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.
Taverniers, Miriam. 2002. Systemic-functional linguistics and the notion of grammatical metaphor. A theoretical study and a proposal for a semiotic-functional integrative model. Ghent: Ghent University PhD thesis.
The Wine Advocate official website. The independent consumer’s guide to fine wine. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
Robert Parker’s rating system. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
A glossary of wine terms. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
White, Peter R.R. 1998. Telling media tales. The news story as rhetoric. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.
. 2001. The Appraisal website. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
. 2002. Appraisal — the language of evaluation and stance. In Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 1–27. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Cited by (26)
Cited by 26 other publications
Allami, Hamid, Monica Karlsson & Hamid Reza Shahroosvand
2024. Functions of idioms in English as lingua franca: An appraisal system account. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel, Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio, Katie Jane Patterson, Manuel Moyano & Irene González
2024. They were not radical, even when they committed that. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict 12:2 ► pp. 139 ff.
Cheng, Shi
2023. A review of interpersonal metafunction studies in systemic functional linguistics (2012–2022). Journal of World Languages
Hommerberg, Charlotte & Maria Lindgren
2023. Our Study. In Depicting the Consumer of Experiential Luxury, ► pp. 33 ff.
Hommerberg, Charlotte & Maria Lindgren
2023. Field-Specific Competencies. In Depicting the Consumer of Experiential Luxury, ► pp. 19 ff.
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
Qiao, Fang & Kexin Jiang
2022. Attitudes Towards Global Warming on Twitter. Journal of Global Information Management 30:7 ► pp. 1 ff.
Smirnova, Elizaveta
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
2021. Introduction. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 1 ff.
Li, Tao & Kaibao Hu
2021. Corpus-Based Translation Studies and Political Discourse Analysis. In Reappraising Self and Others [Corpora and Intercultural Studies, 6], ► pp. 13 ff.
Mavis Ho, Nga-Ki
2021. Transcreation in marketing: a corpus-based study of persuasion in optional shifts from English to Chinese. Perspectives 29:3 ► pp. 426 ff.
Pounds, Gabrina
2021. Presupposed evaluation in environmental argumentative discourse. Functions of Language 28:1 ► pp. 27 ff.
van Driel, Martine
2021. Chapter 8. Evaluating news events. In Style and Reader Response [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 36], ► pp. 143 ff.
Bell, David Michael & Theresa Moran
2020. Comparing the wine tasting notes of Jancis Robinson and Terry Theise: A stylistic analysis. Text & Talk 40:2 ► pp. 125 ff.
Kolhatkar, Varada, Hanhan Wu, Luca Cavasso, Emilie Francis, Kavan Shukla & Maite Taboada
2020. The SFU Opinion and Comments Corpus: A Corpus for the Analysis of Online News Comments. Corpus Pragmatics 4:2 ► pp. 155 ff.
Li, Tao & Yifan Zhu
2020. How does China appraise self and others? A corpus-based analysis of Chinese political discourse. Discourse & Society 31:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
胡, 奕阳
2020. A Parameter-Based Approach to Evaluative Language in Customer Online Review Texts. Modern Linguistics 08:05 ► pp. 667 ff.
Goddard, Cliff, Maite Taboada & Radoslava Trnavac
Paternoster, Annick
2019. Chapter 3. Politeness and evaluative adjectives in Italian turn-of-the-century etiquette books (1877–1914). In Politeness in Nineteenth-Century Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 299], ► pp. 107 ff.
Su, Hang & Susan Hunston
2019. Adjective complementation patterns and judgement: Aligning lexical-grammatical and discourse-semantic approaches in appraisal research. Text & Talk 39:3 ► pp. 415 ff.
Fuoli, Matteo
Don, Alexanne
2016. “It is hard to mesh all this”: Invoking attitude, persona and argument organisation. Functional Linguistics 3:1
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Su, Hang
2016. How products are evaluated? Evaluation in customer review texts. Language Resources and Evaluation 50:3 ► pp. 475 ff.
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg
2015. Optimising transparency, reliability and replicability: annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Hommerberg, Charlotte
2015. Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining Appraisal and argumentation analysis. Text & Talk 35:2
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.