This paper explores the language used by critics to appraise wine, at the same time investigating the validity and usefulness of categories in the Appraisal framework, as set out by Martin & White (2005). Our analysis of a corpus of wine reviews suggests that sub-categories of Appreciation — used to evaluate products, and non-human targets by reference to aesthetics and other values — may need extending or enhancing in terms of delicacy, depending on the register of the texts under investigation. An adapted version of the Appraisal system of Attitude is used as basis for our investigation. The assessment of our adapted model was carried out in the form of a comparison between two analysts’ independent annotations which function as a basis for a critical discussion of the proposed categories. The bulk of the paper discusses the relevance of our findings for the analysis of specialised genres in general, the field of wine criticism in particular and the application of the Appraisal model for discourse analysis. We conclude that the understanding and application of analytical categories is dependent on the analyst’s previous experience with the Appraisal model as well as acquaintance with the discourse field.
2007On the evaluation of wine quality. In Barry C. Smith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 157–182. Oxford: Signal books.
2007aA framework for the investigation of interactive norms and the construction of textual identity in written discourse communities: The case of an email discussion list. Birmingham: University of Birmingham PhD thesis.
2007bAn approach to the analysis of textual identity through profiles of evaluative disposition.
ASFLA 2007 proceedings
2009Legitimating tenor relationships: Affiliation and alignment in written interaction. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 5(3). 1–23.
2013Appraisal question. Paper presented at the
20–21 February 2013, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Folkeryd, Jenny W.
2006Writing with an attitude. Appraisal and student texts in the school subject of Swedish. Uppsala: Uppsala University PhD thesis.
2012Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication 6(1). 55–80.
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg
Forthcoming. Optimizing transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10(3).
Gawel, Richard, Anita Oberholster & Leigh Francis
2000A ‘mouth-feel wheel’: Terminology for communicating the mouth-feel characteristics of red wine. Australian Journal of Grape Wine Research 6(3). 203–207. Available online at [URL]. Date of access 3 March 2011.
2003Wine language. Useful idiom or idiot-speak? In Jean Aitchison & Diana M. Lewis (eds.), New media language, 107–115. London: Routledge.
2007Wine and the brain. In Barry C. Smith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 79–98. Oxford: Signal Books.
The wineanorak’s glossary of wine terms. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
1995Glossary of wine-tasting terminology for the FOODWINE list. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
2011Persuasiveness in the discourse of wine. The rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University PhD thesis.
2015Bringing consumption reviews into relief by combining appraisal and argumentation. Text & Talk 351. 155–175.
Hommerberg, Charlotte & Carita Paradis
2014Constructing credibility in wine reviews. Evidentiality, temporality and epistemic control. In Dylan Glynn & Mette Sjölin (eds.), Subjectivity and epistemicity: Corpus, discourse, and literary approaches to stance, 211–238. Lund: Lund University Press.
2006The persuasive power of prosodies: Radiating values in academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(1). 37–49.
2008Summary writing in academic contexts: Implicating meanings in processes of change. Linguistics and Education 19(4). 351–365.
Hood, Susan & James R. Martin
2007Invoking attitude: The play of graduation in appraising discourse. In Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian Matthiessen & Jonathan J. Webster (eds.), Continuing discourse on language. A functional perspective, 739–764. London & Oakville, CT: Equinox.
Humphrey, Sally & Louise Droga
2002Getting started with functional grammar. Berry, NSW: Target Texts.
2000Evaluation and the planes of discourse. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 176–207. Oxford: OUP.
2006Culture related linguistic differences in tourist websites: The emotive and the factual. A corpus analysis within the framework of Appraisal. In Geoff Thompson & Susan Hunston (eds.), System and corpus. Exploring connections, 269–292. London: Equinox.
1975Talking about wine. Language 51(4). 901–923.
1983Wine and conversation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
2007Can wines be brawny? In Barry C. Smith (ed.), Questions of taste. The philosophy of wine, 127–140. Oxford: Signal Books.
2009Wine and conversation. 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.
2003Appraisal and the special instructiveness of narrative. Text 23(2). 285–312.
Martin, James R.
2000Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Evaluation in text. Authorial stance and the construction of discourse, 142–175. Oxford: OUP.
Martin, James R. & David Rose
2003Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R White
2005The language of evaluation. Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2007The UAM CorpusTool Version 2.8.2. Wagsoft. Available at [URL].
Paradis, Carita & Charlotte Hommerberg
Forthcoming. We drink with our eyes first — the web of sensory perceptions, aesthetic experiences and mixed imagery in wine reviews. In Raymond Gibbs (ed.) Mixing metaphors Amsterdam Benjamins
Read, Jonathan & John Carroll
2012Annotating expressions of Appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 461. 421–447.
1994Exploring literacy in school English. Write it right project. Erskineville: Disadvantaged Schools Program, Department of School Education.
2005Hedonistic fruit bombs. London Review of Books 27(3). 30–32. Available at [URL]. Date of access 21 July 2013.
2003Wet dogs and gushing oranges: Winespeak for a new millennium. Chronicle Review [Online], 491. Available at [URL]. Date of access 7 December 2013.
2003Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 231. 193–229.
Taboada, Maite & Marta Carretero
2012Contrastive analyses of evaluation in text: Key issues in the design of an annotation system for Attitude applicable to consumer reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6 (1–3). 275–295.
2010Semogenesis of a nation. An iconography of Japanese identity. Sydney: University of Sydney PhD thesis.
2002Systemic-functional linguistics and the notion of grammatical metaphor. A theoretical study and a proposal for a semiotic-functional integrative model. Ghent: Ghent University PhD thesis.
The Wine Advocate official website. The independent consumer’s guide to fine wine
2020. A Parameter-Based Approach to Evaluative Language in Customer Online Review Texts. Modern Linguistics 08:05 ► pp. 667 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.