Review published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 22:2 (2015) ► pp.278287
Argamon, Shlomo, Kenneth Bloom, Andrea Esuli & Fabrizio Sebastiani
2009Automatically determining attitude type and force for sentiment analysis. In Zygmunt Vetulani & Hans Uszkoreit (eds.), Human language technology. Challenges of the information society, 218–231. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Artstein, Ron & Massimo Poesio
2008Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34(4). 555–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika & Helen Caple
2012News discourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(2). 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondi, Marina & Anna Mauranen
2003Evaluation in academic discourse. Special issue of Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4).Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1987Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortazzi, Martin & Lixian Jin
2000Evaluating evaluation in narrative. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 102–120.Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo
2012Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication 6(1). 55–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg
Forthcoming. Optimizing transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10(3). DOI logo
Hunston, Susan
1994Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & John Sinclair
2000A local grammar of evaluation. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 74–101.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson
2000Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P.
1997Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warsaw: Energeia.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In William Labov (ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular, 354–396. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James R.
2000Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 142–175.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White
2005The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, Mick
2008Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. In Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the Association for computational linguistics on human language technologies: Demo session, 13–16. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pang, Bo & Lillian Lee
2008Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1–2). 1–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, Jonathan & John Carroll
2012Annotating expressions of appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 46(3). 421–447 First published online, December 2010 doi:  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taboada, Maite & Marta Carretero
2012Contrastive analyses of evaluation in text: Key issues in the design of an annotation system for attitude applicable to consumer reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6(1–3). 275–295.Google Scholar
Taboada, Maite & Jack Grieve
2004Analyzing appraisal automatically. In Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium on exploring attitude and affect in text, 158–161. Stanford, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, Casey, Navendu Garg & Shlomo Argamon
2005Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International conference on information and knowledge management, 625–631. New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar