Review published In:
Functions of LanguageVol. 22:2 (2015) ► pp.278–287
Book review
. Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2014. xi + 418 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 5647 8(hb) 978 90 272 7072 6(eb)
Reviewed by
References (23)
Argamon, Shlomo, Kenneth Bloom, Andrea Esuli & Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2009. Automatically determining attitude type and force for sentiment analysis. In Zygmunt Vetulani & Hans Uszkoreit (eds.), Human language technology. Challenges of the information society, 218–231. Berlin: Springer. 
Artstein, Ron & Massimo Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 34(4). 555–596.
Bednarek, Monika & Helen Caple. 2012. News discourse. London: Continuum.
Biber, Douglas. 2006. Stance in spoken and written university registers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5(2). 97–116.
Bondi, Marina & Anna Mauranen. 2003. Evaluation in academic discourse. Special issue of Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2(4).
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP.
Cortazzi, Martin & Lixian Jin. 2000. Evaluating evaluation in narrative. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 102–120.
Fuoli, Matteo. 2012. Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports. Discourse & Communication 6(1). 55–81.
Fuoli, Matteo & Charlotte Hommerberg. Forthcoming. Optimizing transparency, reliability and replicability: Annotation principles and inter-coder agreement in the quantification of evaluative expressions. Corpora 10(3).
Hunston, Susan. 1994. Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In Malcolm Coulthard (ed.), Advances in written text analysis, 191–218. London: Routledge.
. 2011. Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
Hunston, Susan & John Sinclair. 2000. A local grammar of evaluation. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 74–101.
Hunston, Susan & Geoff Thompson. 2000. Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford: OUP.
Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1997. Angels and devils in hell: Elements of axiology in semantics. Warsaw: Energeia.
Labov, William. 1972. The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In William Labov (ed.), Language in the inner city: Studies in the black English vernacular, 354–396. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Martin, James R. 2000. Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In Susan Hunston & Geoff Thompson (eds.), 142–175.
Martin, James R. & Peter R. R. White. 2005. The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
O’Donnell, Mick. 2008. Demonstration of the UAM CorpusTool for text and image annotation. In Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the Association for computational linguistics on human language technologies: Demo session, 13–16. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
Pang, Bo & Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval 2(1–2). 1–135.
Read, Jonathan & John Carroll. 2012. Annotating expressions of appraisal in English. Language Resources and Evaluation 46(3). 421–447 First published online, December 2010.
Taboada, Maite & Marta Carretero. 2012. Contrastive analyses of evaluation in text: Key issues in the design of an annotation system for attitude applicable to consumer reviews in English and Spanish. Linguistics and the Human Sciences 6(1–3). 275–295.
Taboada, Maite & Jack Grieve. 2004. Analyzing appraisal automatically. In Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium on exploring attitude and affect in text, 158–161. Stanford, CA: AAAI Press.
Whitelaw, Casey, Navendu Garg & Shlomo Argamon. 2005. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM International conference on information and knowledge management, 625–631. New York, NY: ACM.