Article published In:
Functions of Language
Vol. 23:2 (2016) ► pp.214256
References (59)
Alexander, Dennis. 2006. Literal, figurative, metaphorical: A semantic inquiry into the semantic field of game and play in English. Armidale: University of New England PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Juri D. 2000. Systematic lexicography. (Kevin Windle, Trans.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2009. The theory of Lexical Functions: An update. In David Beck, Kim Gerdes, Jasmina Milićević & Alain Polguère (eds.), Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Meaning-Text Theory, 1–14. Montreal: OLST.Google Scholar
Barrios, Rodríguez, María Auxiliadora & Cliff Goddard. 2013. ‘Degrad verbs’ in Spanish and English: Collocations, Lexical Functions and contrastive NSM semantic analysis. Functions of Language 20(2). 219–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C. 2011. A frame-semantic approach to syntactic alternations with build-verbs. In Pilar Guerrero Medina (ed.), Morphosyntactic alternations in English, 207–234. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bowern, Claire. 2008. Linguistic fieldwork: A practical guide. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Donald E. 1991. Human universals. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Andrej Malchukov (eds.). 2015. Valency classes in the world’s languages. Vols 1 and 21. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Norval Smith. 1977. Lingua Descriptive Series: Questionnaire. Lingua 421. 1–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1991. A new approach to English grammar, on semantic principles. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 111–138. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6(2). 222–254.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Beryl T.S. Atkins. 1992. Toward a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbours. In Adrienne Lehrer & Eva Feder Kittay (eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
. 2000. Describing polysemy: The case of ‘crawl’. In Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (eds.), Polysemy: Theoretical and computational approaches, 91–110. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.). 2007. The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
Gladkova, Anna. 2010. Russkaja kul’turnaja semantika: ėmocii, cennosti, žiznennye ustanovki [Russian cultural semantics: Emotions, values, attitudes.] Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff. 1996. Pitjantjatjara/Yankunytjatjara to English Dictionary, revised 2nd edn. Alice Springs: Institute for Aboriginal Development.Google Scholar
. 2003. ‘Thinking’ across languages and cultures: Six dimensions of variation. Cognitive Linguistics 14 (2/3). 109–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. A piece of cheese, a grain of sand: The semantics of mass nouns and unitizers. In Francis Jeffry Pelletier (ed.), Kinds, things and stuff: Mass terms and generics, 132–165. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2011. Semantic analysis: A practical introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. Semantic primes, semantic molecules, semantic templates: Key concepts in the NSM approach to lexical typology. Linguistics 50(3). 711–743. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Verb classes and valency alternations (NSM approach), with special reference to English physical activity verbs. In Bernard Comrie & Andrej Malchukov (eds.), Valency classes in the world’s languages, Vol.21, 1671–1702. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2016. Semantic molecules and their role in NSM lexical definitions. Cahiers de lexicologie 2016/4 (Special issue on “Lexical definitions”, edited by Alain Polguère & Dorota Sikora).Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Andrea C. Schalley. 2010. Semantic analysis. In Nitin Indurkhya & Fred J. Damerau (eds.), Handbook of Natural Language Processing, 2nd edn., 92–120. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Goddard, Cliff & Anna Wierzbicka (eds.). 2002. Meaning and Universal Grammar: Theory and Empirical Findings, Vols. I and II1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Contrastive semantics of physical activity verbs: ‘cutting’ and ‘chopping’ in English, Polish, and Japanese. Language Sciences 311. 60–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014a. Words and meanings: Lexical semantics across domains, languages and cultures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2014b. Semantic fieldwork and lexical universals. Studies in Language 38(1). 80–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka & Jock Wong. 2016. “Walking” and “running” in English and German: The cross-linguistic semantics of verbs of human locomotion. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14(2). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Iren, Martin Haspelmath & Bradley Taylor (eds.). 2013. Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Available online at [URL].Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria, Dagmar Divjak & Ekaterina V. Rakhilina. 2010. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic and Germanic: A case study in lexical typology. In Victoria Hasko & Renee Perelmetter (eds.), New approaches to Slavic verbs of motion, 315–342. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 2005. Argument realization. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levisen, Carsten. 2012. Cultural semantics and social cognition: A case study on the Danish universe of meaning. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Masjak, Timur & Ekaterina Rakhilina (eds.). 2007. Glagoly dviženija v vode: Leksičeskaja tipologija [Aquamotion verbs: Lexical typology]. Moscow: Indrik.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor A. 2012. Semantics: From meaning to text. Vols 1 and 21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pauwels, Paul. 2000. Put, set, lay, place: A cognitive linguistic approach to verbal meaning. München: Lincom.Google Scholar
Peeters, Bert (ed.). 2006. Semantic primes and universal grammar: Evidence from the Romance languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2013. Type theory and lexical decomposition. In James Pustejovsky, Pierrette Bouillon, Hitoshi Isahara, Kyoko Kanzaki & Chungmin Lee (eds.), Advances in Generative Lexicon theory, 9–38. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Beth Levin. 2010. Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doran & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure, 21–38. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruppenhofer, Josef, Michael Ellsworth, Miriam R.L. Petruck, Christopher R. Johnson & Jan Scheffczyk. 2010. FrameNet II: Extended Theory and Practice. Available online at [URL].
Sibly, Anne. 2008. The semantics of physical contact verbs: Lexicographic sketches of caress, fondle, hit, kick, kiss, punch, slap, smack, stroke and touch. Canberra: Australian National University BA Hons thesis.Google Scholar
. 2010. Harry slapped Hugo, Tracey smacked Ritchie: The semantics of slap and smack . Australian Journal of Linguistics 30(3). 323–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1975. Why ‘kill’ does not mean ‘cause to die’: The semantics of action sentences. Foundations of Language 13(4). 491–528.Google Scholar
. 1980. Lingua mentalis: The semantics of natural language. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1985. Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. New York, NY: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2007. NSM semantics versus Conceptual Semantics: Goals and standards (a response to Jackendoff). Intercultural Pragmatics 4(4). 521–529. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. All people eat and drink: Does this mean that ‘eat’ and ‘drink’ are universal human concepts? In John Newman (ed.), The linguistics of eating and drinking, 65–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014a. Imprisoned in English: The hazards of English as a default language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2014b. “Pain” and “suffering” in cross-linguistic perspective. International Journal of Language & Culture 1(2). 149–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilks, Yorick. 1988. Reference and its role in computational models of mental representations. In Umberto Eco, Marco Santambrogio & Patrizia Violi (eds.), Meaning and mental representations, 221–237. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ye, Zhengdao. 2010. Eating and drinking in Mandarin and Shanghainese: A lexical-conceptual analysis. In Wayne Christensen, Elizabeth Schier & John Sutton (eds.), ASCS09: Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the Australasian Society for Cognitive Science , 375–383. Sydney: Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science.
(ed.). In press. The semantics of nouns. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by (16)

Cited by 16 other publications

Goddard, Cliff & David Lambert
2022. Laughter, bonding and biological evolution. The European Journal of Humour Research 10:2  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Ameka, Felix K. & Deborah Hill
2020. The comparative semantics of verbs of ‘opening’: West Africa vs Oceania. In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff & Kerry Mullan
2020. Explicating verbs for “laughing with other people” in French and English (and why it matters for humour studies). HUMOR 33:1  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Hill, Deborah
2020. From Expensive English to Minimal English. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,  pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Mosel, Ulrike
2020. CUT-verbs of the Oceanic language Teop: A critical study of collecting and analysing data in a language documentation project. In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka,  pp. 355 ff. DOI logo
Sadow, Lauren & Kerry Mullan
2020. A Brief Introduction to the Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach. In Studies in Ethnopragmatics, Cultural Semantics, and Intercultural Communication,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff, Maite Taboada & Radoslava Trnavac
2019. The semantics of evaluational adjectives. Functions of Language 26:3  pp. 308 ff. DOI logo
Ye, Zhengdao
2019. The Emergence of Expressible Agency and Irony in Today’s China: A Semantic Explanation of the NewBèi-construction. Australian Journal of Linguistics 39:1  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Wierzbicka, Anna & Cliff Goddard
2018. Talking about our Bodies and their Parts in Warlpiri. Australian Journal of Linguistics 38:1  pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Ameka, Felix K.
2017. Chapter 14. Meaning between algebra and culture. In Crossroads Semantics,  pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2017. Ethnopragmatic perspectives on conversational humour, with special reference to Australian English. Language & Communication 55  pp. 55 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2018. “Joking, kidding, teasing”: Slippery categories for cross-cultural comparison but key words for understanding Anglo conversational humor. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:4  pp. 487 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2018. Minimal English: The Science Behind It. In Minimal English for a Global World,  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff
2020. Prototypes, polysemy and constructional semantics: The lexicogrammar of the English verb climb. In Meaning, Life and Culture: In conversation with Anna Wierzbicka,  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Vicente, Agustín
2017. What words mean and express: semantics and pragmatics of kind terms and verbs. Journal of Pragmatics 117  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Goddard, Cliff, Anna Wierzbicka & Jock Wong
2016. “Walking” and “running” in English and German. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 14:2  pp. 303 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.